By exploring the relationship between the scientific community and the entertainment industry in the construction of fictional films, this paper investigates the impact that fictional representations, created with the assistance of scientists, have on the construction of scientific knowledge and the public understanding of science. I discuss the nature of science consulting on fictional films, including compensation, consultants’ role in the filmmaking process, and the scientific elements consultants can impact in the films. By questioning the nature of fictional “accuracy, ” I demonstrate that the scientific community’s focus on “scientific accuracy” in fiction is flawed. Fictional film naturalizes both “accurate” and “inaccurate” science by presenting both as “natural” via a perceptually realistic framework.
Andreadis, A. (1998) To Seek Out New Life: The Biology of Star Trek. New York: Crown .
3.
Barley, S.R. and Bechky, B. (1994) ‘In the Backrooms of Science: Notes on the Work of Science Technicians’ , Work and Occupations21: 85-126 .
4.
Borucki, M. (1996) ‘For City, State Coffers: An Economic ‘Chain Reaction” , Chicago Tribune6 April: 12 .
5.
Bradley D. (2001) ‘“It’s the Dilithium Crystals, Captain!”; Science on the Screen’, HMS Beagle, The BioMednet Magazine 110, URL (consulted October 2003): news.bmn.com/hmsbeagle/110/notes/adapt.
6.
Bryant, J. and Zillmann, D. (eds) (1994) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum .
Hofstadter, D.R. (1998) ‘Popular Culture and the Threat to Rational Inquiry’ , Science281: 512-513 .
34.
Hoppenstand, G. (1998) ‘The Relationship Between Film Content and Economic Factors’, in B.R. Litman (ed.) The Motion Picture Mega-Industry. Boston: Allyn and Bacon .
35.
Jenkins, R. and Jenkins, S.C. (1998) Life Signs: The Biology of Star Trek. New York: HarperCollins .
36.
Jerome, R. and Duffy, T. (1998) ‘The X-Pert’ , People23 February: 67-68 .
37.
Kirby, D.A. (2003) ‘Science Consultants, Fictional Films, and Scientific Practice’ , Social Studies of Science33(2): in press.
38.
Krauss, L.M. (1996) The Physics of Star Trek. New York: Basic Books .
39.
Leslie, M. (2002) ‘Hollywood Howlers’ , Science297: 19 .
40.
Lewenstein, B.V. (1994) ‘A Survey of Activities in Public Communication of Science and Technology in the United States’ in B. Schiele (ed.) When Science Becomes Culture: World Survey of Scientific Culture. Boucherville, Quebec: University of Ottawa Press .
41.
Ley, W. (1968) Rockets, Missiles, and Men in Space. New York: Viking Press .
42.
Livingston, P. (1997) ‘Cinematic Authorship’, in R. Allen and M. Smith (eds) Film, Theory and Philosophy. New York: Clarendon Press .
43.
McQuail, D. (2000) McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage Publications .
44.
Mestel, R. (1995) ‘Lab Coats in Tinseltown’ , New Scientist148: 28-32 .
45.
Mitman, G. (1999) Reel Nature: America’s Romance with Wildlife on Film. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press .
46.
Naremore, J. (1999) ‘Authorship’, in T. Miller and R. Stam (eds) A Companion to Film Theory. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell .
47.
National Science Foundation (2000) Science & Engineering Indicators—2000. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation .
48.
Nelkin, D. (1987) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
49.
New York Times (1930) “Moon Rocket’ Stays Down’ , 9 February: 3-2 .
50.
Nicholls, P. (1983) The Science in Science Fiction. New York: Alfred A. Knopf .
51.
Nightingale, V. (1996) Studying Audiences: The Shock of the Real. London: Routledge .
52.
Pernick, M. (1996) The Black Stork: Eugenics and the Death of “Defective” Babies in American Medicine and Motion Pictures Since 1915. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
53.
Pickering, A. (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
54.
Reese, K.M. (1997) ‘Illinois Chemist Snagged Briefly by Movie Industry’ , Chemical & Engineering News7 April: 80 .
55.
Reingold, N. (1985) ‘Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Meets the Atom Bomb’, in T. Shinn and R. Whitley (eds) Expository Science. Dordecht: D. Reidel .
56.
Riley, P.J. (1988) A Blind Bargain: A Reconstruction of the Film. Galloway, New Jersey: Magicimage Film Books .
57.
Roach, M. (1995) ‘Virus the Movie’ , Health, May/June: 78-84 .
58.
Sagan, C. (1995) The Demon-Haunted World. New York: Random House .
Shanahan, J. and Morgan, M. (1999) Television and its Viewers: Cultivation Theory and Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
61.
Shapin, S. (1989) ‘The Invisible Technician’ , American Scientist77: 554-563 .
62.
Shay, D. and Duncan, J. (1993) The Making of Jurassic Park. London: Boxtree .
63.
Simon, A.E. (1999) The Real Science Behind the X Files. New York: Simon & Schuster .
64.
Sobchack, V. (1997) Screening Space: The American Science Fiction Film. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press .
65.
Sparks, G. (1998) ‘Paranormal Depictions in the Media: How Do they Affect What People Believe?’ , Skeptical Inquirer22: 35-39 .
66.
Sparks, G., Hansen, T. and Shah, R. (1994) ‘Do Televised Depictions of Paranormal Events Influence Viewers’ Beliefs?’ , Skeptical Inquirer18: 386-395 .
67.
Sparks, G., Nelson, T. and Campbell, R. (1997) ‘The Relationship between Exposure to Televised Messages about Paranormal Phenomena and Paranormal Beliefs’ , Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media41: 345-359 .
68.
Stocker, J.H. (ed.) (1998) Chemistry and Science Fiction. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society .
69.
Toumey, C. (1996) Conjuring Science: Scientific Symbols and Cultural Meanings in American Life. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press .
70.
Tudor, A. (1989) Monsters and Mad Scientists: A Cultural History of the Horror Movie. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
71.
Turow, J. (1989) Playing Doctor: Television, Storytelling, and Medical Power. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press .
