Reading nano: the public interest in nanotechnology as reflected in purchase patterns of books

Abstract

Owing to a rapidly growing public interest in nanotechnology, people are increasingly buying various books to inform themselves about nanotechnology. This paper tries to measure the public interest in nanotechnology and its relation to the public interest in other fields of knowledge by applying a new method. I combine formal network analysis of co-purchase book data with traditional content analysis. The method is successful in identifying the books that the public reads to be informed about nanotechnology, and in distinguishing between different kinds and classes of books and thereby between different interest foci and readerships and their relations. The results suggest that nanotechnology is for many their first intense contact with science and technology and that they read a great variety of different kinds of books. Rather than choose general introductions to current research written by scientists or science journalists, readers focus on forecasting and visionary literature including business guides, written by software entrepreneurs and business consultants. Unlike expert readers, who connect nanotechnology to other fields of science and engineering, the broader public connects it to visions about dissolving the human/machine distinction. Although the distinction between non-fiction and science fiction is still important for readers, border-crossing authors increasingly blur it.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, A. , Allan, S. and Petersen, A. (2004) “Pictorial and Textual Representations of Nanotechnology in the UK Press. Media images of nanotechnology,” Paper presented at the conference Imaging and Imagining NanoScience and Engineering, Columbia, SC, 3-7 March.

Anonymous (2003) “Amazon.com and the Librarian: Amazon.com Can Be a useful Citation Verification Tool for Reference and Collection Development,” MLA News—Medical Library Association no. 352: 11.

Borgman, C.L. (ed.) (1990) Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. Newbury Park: SAGE .

Crichton, M. (2002) Prey. New York: Harper Collins .

Cronin, B. and Atkins, H.B. (eds.) (2000) The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford, NJ: Information Today .

Dann, J. and Dozois, G. (eds.) (1998) Nanotech. New York: Ace Books .

Drexler, K.E. , Petersen, C. and Pergamit, G. (1991) Unbounding the Future: The Nanotechnology Revolution. New York: Morrow .

Eades, P. (1984) “A Heuristic for Graph Drawing,” Congressus Numerantium 42: 149-160 .

Eakin, E. (2004) “Study Finds a Nation of Polarized Readers,” New York Times 13 March.

10.

Felt, U. (2002) “Conceptualising the Relationships between Sciences and Publics,” in U. Felt (ed.) Optimising Public Understanding of Science and Technology: Final Report, Chapter 1. Vienna: University of Vienna . URL: http://www.univie.ac.at/virusss/OPUSReport/index.html

11.

Flynn, M. (1991) The Nanotech Chronicles. Riverdale, NJ: Baen Books .

12.

Krebs, V. (1999) “The Social Life of Books: Visualizing Communities of Interest via Purchase Patterns on the WWW.” URL: http://www.orgnet.com/booknet.html

13.

Krebs, V. (2003) “Divided We Stand???” URL: http://www.orgnet.com/leftright.html

14.

Krebs, V. (2004) “Divided We Stand... Still.” URL: http://www.orgnet.com/divided.html

15.

Lewenstein, B.V. and Radin, J. (2004) “Media Images of Nanotechnology,” Paper presented at the conference Imaging and Imagining NanoScience and Engineering, Columbia, SC, 3-7 March.

16.

Marlow, J.R. (2004) Nano. New York: Forge .

17.

Milburn, C. (2002) “Nanotechnology in the Age of Post-human Engineering: Science Fiction as Science,” Configurations 10: 261-295 .

18.

Miller, P. and Macnaghten, P. (2004) “Small Stories: Developing a Framework for the Public Imagination of Nanotechnology. Media Images of Nanotechnology,” Paper presented at the conference Imaging and Imagining NanoScience and Engineering, Columbia, SC, 3-7 March.

19.

Napier, A.S. (2003) “Nanotechnology in Science Fiction.” URL: http://www.geocities.com/asnapier/nano/n-sf/

20.

NSET (US Committee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology) (2000) “Nantoechnology Definition.” URL: http://www.nsf.gov/home/crssprgm/nano/omb_nifty50.htm

21.

NSTC (National Science and Technology Council) (2000) National Nanotechnology Initiative: The Initiative and its Implementation Plan. Washington, DC , p. 13. URL: http://www.nano.gov/html/res/nni2.pdf

22.

Pardo, R. and Calvo, F. (2002) “Attitudes toward Science among the European Public: a Methodological Analysis,” Public Understanding of Science 11: 155-195 .

23.

Schummer, J. (2004a) “Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, and Patterns of Research Collaboration in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology,” Scientometrics 59: 425-465 .

24.

Schummer, J. (2004b) “Interdisciplinary Issues of Nanoscale Research,” in D. Baird , A. Nordmann and J. Schummer (eds.) Discovering the Nanoscale, pp. 9-20. Amsterdam: IOS Press .

25.

Scott, J. (1994) Social Network Analysis: a Handbook. London: SAGE .

26.

Seidman, S. (1983) “Network Structure and Minimum Degree,” Social Networks 5: 269-287 .

27.

Stephens, L.F. (2004) “News Narratives about Nano: How Journalists and the News Media Are Framing Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Initiatives and Issues. Media Images of Nanotechnology,” Paper presented at the conference Imaging and Imagining NanoScience and Engineering, Columbia, SC, 3-7 March.

28.

Stephenson, N. (1995) The Diamond Age, or, Young Lady’s Illustrated Primer. New York: Bantam Books .

29.

Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .