In taking the landscape-scale view increasingly demanded of natural resource management, scientific assessments make considerable use of geographic information systems (GIS) maps to convey the research findings they develop. Public interaction with scientists over natural resource management issues is therefore frequently mediated by such maps, which can directly influence how the landscape is viewed, and how science findings are communicated and understood. Analysis of the Coastal Landscape Analysis and Modeling Study (CLAMS) project in western Oregon reveals that GIS maps play a significant role in how we frame and address natural resource management issues. They can support the role of privileged knowledge as held by the map makers, typically scientists, and may reinforce it by the de facto “map tyranny” that gives primacy to scientific worldviews. But they can also enable broader kinds of inquiry through multiple frames of reference, enhancing story-making opportunities for stakeholders. Which of these trajectories is followed is affected by resource availability and new perceptions of responsibility, each of which reflects social power structures. The CLAMS case study suggests that map user/non-scientists appear less likely to be victims of “map tyranny” the more familiar they are with the technology. Accordingly, they become more likely to push for usable results from it, and more confident about engaging their own knowledge with that of the map maker/scientists.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aberley, D. (1993) Boundaries of Home: Mapping for Local Empowerment. Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Society Publishers .
2.
Barrett, M. , Sahay, S. and Walsham, G. (2001) “Information Technology and Social Transformation: GIS for Forestry Management in India,”The Information Society17: 5-20 .
3.
Beard, J. W. (2002) “Management of Technology: A Three-Dimensional Framework with Propositions for Future Research,”Knowledge, Technology, and Policy15(3): 45-57 .
4.
Benda, L. , Poff, N. L. , Tague, C. , Palmer, M. A. , Pizzuto, J. , Cooper, S. , Stanley, E. and Moglen, G. (2002) “How to Avoid Train Wrecks When Using Science in Environmental Problem Solving,”BioScience52(12): 1127-1137 .
5.
Berkes, F. , Colding, J. and Folke, C. (2000) “Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management,”Ecological Applications10(5): 1251-1262 .
6.
Bojorquez-Tapia, L. A. , Diaz-Mondragon, S. and Ezcurra, E. (2001) “GIS-based Approach for Participatory Decision Making and Land Suitability Assessment,”International Journal of Geographical Information Science15(2): 129-151 .
7.
Bouwen, R. and Taillieu, T. (2004) “Multi-party Collaboration as Social Learning for Interdependence: Developing Relational Knowing for Sustainable Natural Resource Management,”Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology14: 137-153 .
8.
Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1996) “Stolen Knowledge,” in H. McLellan (ed.) Situated Learning Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications .
9.
Brunn, S. D. , Dahlman, C. T. and Taylor, J. S. (1998) “GIS Uses and Constraints on Diffusion in Eastern Europe and the Former USSR,”Post-Soviet Geography and Economics39(10): 566-587 .
10.
Ceccato, V. A. and Snickars, F. (2000) “Adapting GIS Technology to the Needs of Local Planning,”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design27: 923-937 .
11.
Cosio, R. Gomez Gonzalez (1998) “Social Constructivism and Capacity Building for Environmental Governance,”International Planning Studies3(3): 367-390 .
12.
Curry, M. R. (1998) Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information Technologies. New York: Routledge .
13.
Duncan, S.L. (2004) “Technology and Meaning in Natural Resource Management: The Story-making Potential of GIS in the CLAMS Project,” Ph.D. thesis, Environmental Sciences, Oregon State University.
14.
Dunn, C. E. , Atkins, P. J. , Blakemore, M. J. and Townsend, J. G. (1999) “Teaching Geographical Information Handling Skills for Lower-income Countries,”Transactions in GIS3(4): 319-333 .
15.
Elwood, S. and Ghose, R. (2004) “PPGIS in Community Development Planning: Framing the Organizational Context,”Cartographica38(3&4): 19-33 .
16.
Elwood, S. and Leitner, J. (2003) “GIS and Spatial Knowledge Production for Neighborhood Revitalization: Negotiating State Priorities and Neighborhood Visions,”Journal of Urban Affairs25(2): 139-157 .
17.
Fall, A. , Morgan, D. G. and Daust, D. (2001) “A Framework and Software Tool to Support Collaborative Landscape Analysis: Fitting Square Pegs into Square Holes,”Transactions in GIS5(1): 67-86 .
18.
Fischer, F. (2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
19.
Fischer, G. and Ostwald, J. (2001) “Knowledge Management: Problems, Promises, Realities, and Challenges,”IEEE Intelligent SystemsJanuary/February: 60-72 .
20.
Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. (2001) “Post-Normal Science: Science and Governance under Conditions of Complexity,” in M. Decker (ed.) Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment: Implementation and its Chances and Limits, pp. 15-24. Berlin: Springer .
21.
Geertz, C. (1976) “Art as a Cultural System,”MLN91: 1473-1499 .
22.
Gergen, K. (1983) Towards Transformation in Social Knowledge. London: SAGE .
23.
Gethman, C. F. (2001) “Participatory Technology Assessment: Some Critical Questions,” in M. Decker (ed.) Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment: Implementation and its Chances and Limits, pp. 3-13. Berlin: Springer .
24.
Ghose, R. (2005) “The Complexities of Citizen Participation through Collaborative Governance,”Space and Polity9(1): 61-75 .
25.
Gillespie, S. R. (2000) “An Empirical Approach to Estimating GIS Benefits,”URISA Journal12(1): 7-13 .
26.
Hendriks, P. H. (2000) “An Organizational Learning Perspective on GIS,”International Journal of Geographical Information Science14(4): 373-396 .
27.
Hillier, J. (2003) “Fighting over the Forests: Environmental Conflict and Decision-making Capacity in Forest Planning Processes,”Australian Geographical Studies41(3): 251-269 .
28.
Jankowski, P. and Nyerges, T. (2001) “GIS-Supported Collaborative Decision Making: Results of an Experiment,”Annals of the Association of American Geographers91(1): 48-71 .
29.
Jankowski, P. , Andrienko, N. and Andrienko, G. (2001) “Map-centred Exploratory Approach to Multiple Criteria Spatial Decision Making,”International Journal of Geographical Information Science15(2): 101-127 .
30.
Johnson, K. N. , Swanson, F. J. , Herring, M. and Greene, S. , eds (1999) Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy. Washington, DC: Island Press .
31.
Kasemir, B. , Schibli, D. , Stoll, S. and Jaeger, C. C. (2000) “Involving the Public in Climate and Energy Decisions,”Environment42(3): 32-43 .
32.
Kyem, P. A. Kwaku (2004) “Power, Participation, and Inflexible Institutions: An Examination of the Challenges to Community Empowerment in Participatory GIS Applications,”Cartographica38(3&4): 5-17 .
33.
Lach, D. , List, P. , Steel, B. and Shindler, B. (2003) “Advocacy and Credibility of Ecological Scientists in Resource Decisionmaking: A Regional Study,”BioScience53(2): 170-179 .
34.
Mark, D. M. (2000) “Geographic Information Science: Critical Issues in an Emerging Cross-Disciplinary Research Domain,”URISA Journal12(1): 45-54 .
35.
Masser, I. (1996) “GIS Diffusion,” in I. Masser , H. Campbell and M. Craglia (eds) The Adoption and Use of Geographical Information Systems in Local Government in Europe, pp. 211-235. Bristol, PA and London: Taylor & Francis .
36.
McLuhan, M. (1964) Understanding Media. New York: McGraw-Hill .
37.
Norheim, R. (2004) “How Institutional Cultures Affect Results: Comparing Two Old-growth Forest Mapping Projects,”Cartographica38(3&4): 35-52 .
38.
Norton, B. G. (1998) “Improving Ecological Communication: The Role of Ecologists in Environmental Policy Formulation,”Ecological Applications8(2): 350-364 .
39.
Nyerges, T. , Jankowski, P. and Drew, C. (2002) “Data-gathering Strategies for Social-behavioral Research about Participatory Geographical Information System Use,”International Journal of Geographical Information Science16(1): 1-22 .
40.
Pickles, J. (1995) “Representations in an Electronic Age: Geography, GIS, and Democracy,” in J. Pickles (ed.) Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems, pp. 1-31. New York: Guilford Press .
41.
Pickles, J. (2004) A History of Spaces: Cartographic Reason, Mapping and the Geo-coded World. London: Routledge .
42.
Postman, N. (1992) Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage Press .
43.
Priest, S. Hornig (1995) “Information Equity, Public Understanding of Science, and the Biotechnology Debate,”Journal of Communication45(1): 39-54 .
44.
Puri, S. K. and Sahay, S. (2003) “Participation through Communicative Action: A Case Study of GIS for Addressing Land/Water Development in India,”Information Technology for Development10: 179-199 .
45.
Rappert, B. (2001) “The Distribution and Resolution of the Ambiguities of Technology, or Why Bobby Can’t Spray,”Social Studies of Science31(4): 557-591 .
46.
Robinson, A. H. and Petchenik, B. B. (1976) The Nature of Maps. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
47.
Rogers, E. M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn.New York: Free Press .
48.
Rohracher, H. (2003) “The Role of Users in the Social Shaping of Environmental Technologies,”Innovation16(2): 177-192 .
49.
Rundstrom, R. A. (1990) “A Cultural Interpretation of Inuit Map Accuracy,”Geographical Review80(2): 154-168 .
50.
Sandercock, L. (2004) “Towards a Planning Imagination for the 21st Century,”Journal of the American Planning Association70(2): 133-141 .
51.
Schuurman, N. (1999) “Critical GIS: Theorizing an Emerging Science,”Cartographica36(4): 1-101 .
52.
Shotter, J. (1993) Conversational Realities: Constructing Life through Language. London: SAGE .
53.
Sieber, R. E. (2000a) “Conforming (to) the Opposition: the Social Construction of Geographical Information Systems in Social Movements,”International Journal of Geographical Information Science14(8): 775-793 .
54.
Sieber, R. E. (2000b) “GIS Implementation in the Grassroots,”URISA Journal12(1): 15-29 .
55.
Sismondo, S. and Chrisman, N. (2001) “Deflationary Metaphysics and the Natures of Maps,”Philosophy of Science68 (Proceedings): S38-S49 .
56.
Strauss, A. L. (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
57.
Taylor, P. J. and Johnston, R. J. (1995) “Geographic Information Systems and Geography,” in J. Pickles (ed.) Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems, pp. 51-68. New York: Guilford Press .
58.
Tufte, E. R. (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press .
59.
Weber, J. R. and Word, C. S. (2001) “The Communication Process as Evaluative Context: What do Non-scientists Hear When Scientists Speak?,”BioScience51(6): 487-496 .
60.
Wejnert, B. (2002) “Integrating Models of Diffusion of Innovations: A Conceptual Framework,”Annual Review of Sociology28: 297-326 .
