Perceptions,Knowledge and ethical concerns with GM foods and the GM process

Abstract

Compared to their European counterparts, the American public has been characterized as relatively unknowledgeable and indifferent about genetically modified foods. To evaluate these claims, six focus groups were held in three Arkansas cities to: (1) determine the extent of knowledge the public possesses about genetically modified foods; (2) detail perceived benefits and risks associated with agricultural biotechnology applications; and (3) explore lay perceptions about the genetic modification process itself. Participants demonstrated partial knowledge, and tended to overestimate the number of genetically modified foods. However, participants tended to be familiar with debates surrounding benefits, risks and moral issues associated with agricultural biotechnology applications. Findings also showed that while participants were not overly concerned about combining genes between plants, they were concerned about inserting animal genes into plants. If these results are any indication, moral and ethical issues will dominate any discussion of foods derived from a mixture of animal and plant genes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bauer, M.W. and Gaskell, G. (2002) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biel, A. and Nilsson, A. (2005) "Religious Values and Environmental Concern: Harmony and Detachment," Social Science Quarterly 86(1): 178-91.

Evensen, C. , Hoban, T. and Woodrum, E. (2000) "Technology and Morality: Influences on Public Attitudes toward Biotechnology," Knowledge, Technology, and Policy 13(1): 43-57.

Fischoff, B. and Fischoff, I. (2001) "Publics' Opinion about Biotechnologies," AgBioForum 4(3&4): 155-62. URL: http://www.agbioforum.org

Frewer, L.J. , Howard, C. and Shepherd, R. (1997) "Public Concerns in the United Kingdom about General and Specific Applications of Genetic Engineering: Risk, Benefit, and Ethics ," Science, Technology, and Human Values 22(1): 98-124.

Gaskell, G. , Allum, N. , Wagner, W. , Kronberger, N. , Torgensen, H. , Hampel, J. and Bardes, J. (2004) "GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception ," Risk Analysis 24(1): 185-94.

Hallman, W. , Adelaja, A. and Schilling, B. (2002) Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnology in the United States in 2001. New Brunswick, NJ: Food Policy Institute.

House, L. , Lusk, J. , Jaeger, S. , Traill, W.B. , Moore, M. , Valli, C. , Morrow, B. and Yee, W.M.S. (2004) "Objective and Subjective Knowledge: Impacts on Consumer Demand for Genetically Modified Foods in the United States and the European Union," AgBioForum 7(3): 113-23. URL: http://www.agbioforum.org

Jasanoff, S. (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

10.

Kitzinger, J. (1994) "The Methodology of Focus Groups: The Importance of Interaction between Research Participants," Sociology of Health and Illness 16(1): 103-21.

11.

Knight, A. (2005) "Differences between Perceived Knowledge and Objective Knowledge Measures in Perceptions of Biotechnology Applications," AgBioForum 8(4): 221-7. URL: http://www.agbioforum.org

12.

Knight, A. (2007) "Biotechnology, Industrial Agriculture and the Risk Society," Society and Natural Resources 20(1): 21-36.

13.

Margolis, H. (1997) Dealing with Risk: Why the Public and the Experts Disagree on Environmental Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

14.

Nelson, C.H. (2001) "Risk Perception, Behavior, and Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Organisms: Toward Understanding American and European Public Reaction," American Behavioral Scientist 44(8): 1371-88.

15.

Pascalev, A. (2003) "You Are What You Eat: Genetically Modified Foods, Integrity, and Society," Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16: 583-94.

16.

Shaw, A. (2002) "`It Just Goes against the Grain': Public Understandings of Genetically Modified (GM) Food in the UK," Public Understanding of Science 11: 273-91.

17.

Sheehy, H. , Legault, M. and Ireland, D. (1998) "Consumers and Biotechnology: A Synopsis of Survey and Focus Group Research," Journal of Consumer Policy 21: 359-86.

18.

Sonka, S.T. (2001) "Framing within a Knowledge Creating System: Biotechnology and Tomorrow's Agriculture," American Behavioral Scientist 44(8): 1327-49.

19.

Traill, W.B. , Jaeger, S.R. , Yee, W. , Valli, C. , House, L.O. , Lusk, J.L. , Moore, M. and Morrow, J.L., Jr. (2004) "Categories of GM Risk-Benefit Perceptions and their Antecedents," AgBioForum 7(4): 176-86. URL: http://agbioforum.org

20.

Victor, D.G. and Runge, C.F. (2002) "Farming the Genetic Frontier," Foreign Affairs 81(3): 107-13.

21.

Wagner, W. , Kronberger, N. , Gaskell, G. , Allansdottir, A. , Allum, N. , de Chevegné, S. , Dahinden, U. , Diego, C. , Montali, L. , Mortensen, A.T. , Pfenning, U. , Rusanen, T. and Seger, N. (2001) "Nature in Disorder: The Troubled Public of Biotechnology ," in G. Gaskell and M.W. Bauer (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, pp. 80-96. London: Science Museum.