This paper addresses the dilemmas of participant sampling and recruitment for deliberative science policy projects. Results are drawn from a deliberative public event that was held in April and May, 2007. The research objective of The BC Biobank Deliberation was to assess deliberative democracy as an approach to legitimate policy advice from a subset of British Columbians concerning the secondary use of human tissues for prospective genomic and genetic research. The overall goal was to have participants identify key values that should guide a biobank in British Columbia. This paper assesses our team’s group decision-making processes concerning participant sampling for the 2007 event. Results presented here should allow the reader to critically examine our team’s choices and could also be used to assist advocates of deliberative democracy and others who may wish to propose similar events in the future.
Abelson, J., Forest, P.-G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E. and Gauvin, F.-P. ( 2001) "Deliberations about Deliberation: Issues in the Design and Evaluation of Public Consultation Processes," Research Working Paper 01-04, McMaster University Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis.
2.
Avard, D., Bucci, L., Burgess, M.M., Kaye, J., Heeney, C. and Cambon-Thomsen, A. (under review) "Public Health Genomics (PHG) and Public Participation: Points to Consider,"Journal of Public Health Policy.
3.
Baird, L. and Henderson, H. ( 2001) "Nuu-Chah-Nulth Case History," in K.C. Glass and J.M. Kaufert (eds) Continuing the Dialogue: Genetic Research with Aboriginal Individuals and Communities, pp. 30-43. Proceedings of a workshop sponsored by the Canadian Commission for the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Health Canada, and the National Council on Ethics in Human Research, 26-7 January, Vancouver BC .
4.
Bohman, J.F. ( 1998) "The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy," Journal of Political Philosophy6(4): 399-423.
5.
Burgess, M. and O’Doherty, K. ( 2007) "Deliberative Public Engagement Related to Governing Biobanks: Final Report," Electronic Working Papers Series, W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia. URL: http://gels.ethics.ubc.ca:8213/ge3ls-arch/face-to-face/working-papers
6.
Burgess, M. and Tansey, J. (forthcoming) "Democratic Deficit and the Politics of ‘Informed and Inclusive’ Consultation," in E. Einseidel and R. Parker (eds) Hindsight and Foresight on Emerging Technologies. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
7.
Burgess, M., O’Doherty, K. and Secko, D. ( 2008) "Biobanking in British Columbia: Discussions of the Future of Personalized Medicine through Deliberative Public Engagement," Personalized Medicine5(3): 285-96.
8.
Canadian Evaluation Society (2006) " Guidelines for Ethical Conduct" URL: http://www.evaluationcanada.ca/site.cgi?s=5&ss=4&_lang=an (accessed 23 November 2006).
9.
Chambers, S. ( 2003) "Deliberative Democratic Theory," Annual Review of Political Science6: 307-26.
10.
Dietrich, H. and Schibeci, R. ( 2003) "Beyond Public Perceptions of Gene Technology: Community Participation in Public Policy in Australia," Public Understanding of Science12: 381-401.
11.
Dryzek, J. ( 1990) Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Einsiedel, E.F. ( 2002) "Assessing a Controversial Medical Technology: Canadian Public Consultations on Xenotransplantation," Public Understanding of Science11: 315-31.
13.
Fishkin, J. and Laslett, P. ( 2003) Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford : Blackwell.
14.
Fukuyama, F. and Furger, F. ( 2007) Beyond Bioethics: A Proposal for Modernizing the Regulation of Human Biotechnologies. Washington, DC: Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies.
15.
Fung, A. ( 2006) personal communication. Workshop on "Deliberative Democracy and Biobanks," Vancouver, BC, 9-11 November.
16.
Gastil, J. and Levine, P. ( 2005) The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
17.
Gregory, R., McDaniels, T. and Fields, D. ( 2001) "Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: A New Perspective for Environmental Negotiation," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management20(3): 415-32.
18.
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. ( 1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
19.
House of Lords (2000) Science and Technology-Third Report. Science and Technology Select Committee. London: HMSO.
20.
Keeney, R.L. ( 1992) Value Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making , pp. 16-22. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Keeney, R. ( 1994) "Creativity in Decision Making with Value Focused Thinking ," Sloan Management Review Summer: 33-41.
22.
Keeney, R. and McDaniels, T. ( 1999) "Identifying and Structuring Values to Guide Integrated Resource Planning at BC Gas," Operations Research47(5): 651-62.
23.
Longstaff, H., Burgess, M. and Lewis, P. ( 2006) "Comparing Methods of Ethical Consultation for Biotechnology Related Issues", Health Law Review15(1): 37-38.
24.
Longstaff, H. and Secko, D. (under review) "Media Influence on Biobank Deliberations," Journal of Public Deliberation.
25.
Luskin, R.C., Fishkin, J.S. and Iyengar, S. ( 2006) "Considered Opinions on U.S. Foreign Policy: Face-to-Face versus Online Deliberative Polling," Centre for Deliberative Democracy working paper series, Stanford University . URL: http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/
26.
McDaniels, T. ( 2000) "Creating and Using Objectives for Ecological Risk Assessment and Management," Environmental Science and Policy3: 299-304.
27.
McDaniels, T. and Gregory, R. ( 2004) "Learning as an Objective within Structured Decision Processes for Managing Environmental Risks," Environmental Science and Technology38(7): 1921-6.
28.
McDonald, M. ( 2001) "Framework for Ethical Decision-Making," The W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics Website. URL: http://www.ethics.ubc.ca/people/mcdonald/decisions.htm (accessed 22 January 2007).
29.
MacLean, S. and Burgess, M. (under review) "In the Public Interest: Assessing Expert and Stakeholder Influence in Public Deliberation about Biobanks."
30.
Niemeyer, S. ( 2004) "Deliberation in the Wilderness: Displacing Symbolic Politics ," Environmental Politics13(2): 347-72.
31.
O’Doherty, K. and Davidson, H. ( 2008) "Subject Positions and Self-Warranting in a Deliberative Democracy Event on Biobanking," Electronic Working Papers Series, W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia. http://gels.ethics.ubc.ca.8213/ge31s-arch-working-papers
32.
Office of Science and Technology and the Wellcome Trust ( 2001) "Science and the Public: A Review of Science Communication and Public Attitudes toward Science in Britain," Public Understanding of Science10: 315-30.
33.
Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J. ( 2005) "A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms," Science, Technology, and Human Values30(2): 251-90.
34.
Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J. and Pidgeon, N. ( 2005) "Difficulties in Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives: Reflections on an Evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public Debate about Transgenic Crops," Public Understanding of Science14: 331-52.
35.
Sunstein, C. ( 2002) "The Law of Group Polarization," Journal of Political Philosophy10(2): 175-95.
36.
Tansey, J. and Burgess, M. ( 2004) "The Foundations, Applications and Ethical Dimensions of Biobanks," Electronic Working Papers Series, W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia. URL: www.ethics.ubc.ca
37.
Tymchuk, M. ( 2000) "Bad Blood: Management and Function," Canadian Broadcasting Company, National Radio.
38.
Walmsley, H. (under review) "Mad Scientists Bend the ‘Frame’ of Biobanking Governance in BC: How Ethnographic Attention to Stories can help Deliberative Events ‘Listen’," Journal of Public Deliberation .
