Technology for everyone: representations of technology in popular Italian scientific magazines

Abstract

Over the last few years, several popular techno-scientific magazines have been published which provide a number of visions with regards to technology. This paper aims to analyze the manner in which some of these popular Italian scientific magazines represent technology. The methodology utilized in this analysis is based on a frame analysis of a sampling of five Italian popular scientific magazines ( Focus, Quark, T3, Jack, Explora), covering a period extending from July 2004 to January 2006. Results of this analysis show that two of the most frequent frames are the “vaporware” frame, relating to technologies not yet ready for the market, however presented as though they were, and the “relationships between technologies” frame, which emphasizes the relationship certain technologies have with other technologies. Technology is represented in negative as well as positive terms, often on the same topic and in the same magazine. This paper refers to this type of representation as “technological Orientalism,” quoting Said, meaning that technology is always seen as something which can be both terrifying and dangerous as well as wondrous and fabulous.

Keywords

frame analysis magazines media and technology popular visions of technology representations of technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altheide, D.L. and Snow, R.P. ( 1979) Media Logic. London: SAGE.

Barkun, M. ( 2003) A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bijker, W. E. and Law, J. , eds (1992) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.

Bijker, W. E., Hughes, Th. P. and Pinch, T. J., eds (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brown, N. , Rappert, B. and Webster, A. ( 2000) Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno Science . Aldershot: Ashgate.

Bucchi, M. ( 2004) Science in Society. London and New York: Routledge.

Bucchi, M. and Mazzolini, R. ( 2003) "Big Science, Little News: Science Coverage in the Italian Daily Press, 1946-1997," Public Understanding of Science 12: 7-24.

Christidou, V. , Dimopoulos, K. and Koulaidis, V. ( 2004) "Constructing Social Representations of Science and Technology: The Role of Metaphors in the Press and Popular Scientific Magazines," Public Understanding of Science 13: 347-62.

Corn, J. ( 1999) Imagining Tomorrow: History, Technology, and the American Future. Boston: MIT Press.

10.

De Laat, B. and Larèdo, P. ( 1998) "Foresight for Research and Technology Policies: From Innovations Studies to Scenario Confrontation," in R. Coombs , K. Green , A. Richards and V. Walsh (eds) Technological Change and Organization, pp. 150-79. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.

11.

Dery, M. ( 1996) Escape Velocity. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

12.

Dimopoulos, K. and Koulaidis, V. ( 2002) "The Socio-epistemic Constitution of Science and Technology in the Greek Press: An Analysis of its Presentation," Public Understanding of Science 11: 225-41.

13.

Driedgera, M. and Eyles, E. ( 2003) "Different Frames, Different Fears: Communicating about Chlorinated Drinking Water and Cancer in the Canadian Media," Social Science and Medicine 56: 1279-93.

14.

Einsiedel, E. ( 1992) "Framing Science and Technology in the Canadian Press ," Public Understanding of Science 1: 89-101.

15.

Entman, R. ( 1993) "Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm ," Journal of Communication 43: 51-8.

16.

Fenster, M. ( 1999) Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

17.

Goodman, R. and Goodman, B. ( 2006) "Beneficial or Biohazard? How the Media Frame Biosolids ," Public Understanding of Science 15: 359-75.

18.

Hellstein, I. ( 2002) "Selling the Life Sciences: Promises of a Better Future in Biotechnology Advertisements," Science as Culture 11(4): 459-79.

19.

Hilgartner, S. ( 1990) "The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses," Social Studies of Science 20: 519-39.

20.

Kohring, M. and Matthes, J. ( 2002) "The Face(t)s of Biotech in the Nineties: How the German Press Framed Modern Biotechnology," Public Understanding of Science 11: 143-54.

21.

Martin, R. ( 1995) "Foresight in Science and Technology," Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 7(2): 139-68.

22.

O’Mahony, P. and Schäfer, M. ( 2005) "The ‘Book of Life’ in the Press," Social Studies of Science 35: 99-130.

23.

Ortoleva, P. ( 1994) "Introduzione all’edizione italiana," pp. XI-XXXIII in C. Marvin Quando le vecchie tecnologie erano nuove. Torino : UTET.

24.

Rappert, B. ( 1999) "Rationalising the Future," Futures 31: 527-45.

25.

Rappert, B. and Brown, N. ( 2000) "Putting the Future in its Place: Comparing Innovation Moments in Genetic Diagnostics and Telemedicine," New Genetics and Society 19(1): 49-74.

26.

Rössler, P. ( 2001) "Between Online Heaven and Cyberhell: The Framing of ‘the Internet’ by Traditional Media Coverage in Germany," New Media and Society 3(1): 49-66.

27.

Sagan, C. ( 1996) The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark . London: Random House.

28.

Said, E. ( 1978) Orientalism. London: Penguin.

29.

Scheufele, D. ( 1999) "Framing as a Theory of Media Effects," Journal of Communication 49: 103-22.

30.

Väliverronen, E. ( 2004) "Stories of the ‘Medicine Cow’: Representations of Future Promises in Media Discourse," Public Understanding of Science 13: 363-77.

31.

Zimmerman, C. , Bisanz, G. , Bisanz, J. , Klein, K. and Klein, P. ( 2001) "Science at the Supermarket: A Comparison of What Appears in the Popular Press, Experts’ Advice to Readers, and What Students Want to Know," Public Understanding of Science 10: 37-58.