Recent years have witnessed a ‘democratic turn’ towards active citizen participation in science and technology. The emerging participatory approach has been framed as a critique of a reductionist, outdated ‘deficit model’ of citizen competence, literacy or understanding. Participatory modes of citizen involvement with science are presented as competing rather than complementary in offering a strategy for making science and technology accountable and open to society. We use latent class models to develop cross-national measures of competence and participation, and explore the relation between the two. We argue that the question of how to analyze and assess the role of citizens in knowledge societies should not be an either/or — participation or competence — but a matter of understanding the balance and interconnected-ness of both. We suggest that the idea of a ‘scientific citizenship’ could be a useful integrative notion to bridge the divide between concerns about public participation and public competence.
Almond, G.A. and Verba, S. ( 1963) The Civic Culture-Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
Banthien, H., Jaspers, M. and Renner, A. ( 2003) Governance of the European Research Area: The Role of Civil Society. Brussels: European Commission.
3.
Barber, B. ( 1984) Strong Democracy-Participatory Politics for a New Age . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
4.
Bartholomew, D.J. and Knott, M. ( 1999) Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis. London: Arnold.
5.
Bartholomew, D.J., Steele, F., Moustaki, I. and Galbraith, J.I. ( 2002) The Analysis and Interpretation of Multivariate Data for Social Scientists. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
6.
Bauer, M.W. ( 2004) "The Vicissitudes of ‘Public Understanding of Science’: From ‘Literacy’ to ’Science in Society’, in J. Caraça, A. Firmino da Costa, R. Gerold, M.W. Bauer, P. Caro , M.E. Gonçalves, R. Vargas, C. Barata, T. Duffy and M. Mosley , Science meets Society, pp. 39-65. Lisbon: Fundacâo Calouste Gulbenkian.
7.
Bauer, M., Allum, N. and Miller, S. ( 2007) "What Can We Learn from 25 Years of PUS Survey Research? Liberating and Expanding the Agenda," Public Understanding of Science16(1): 79-95.
8.
Durant, J.R. ( 1999) "Participatory Technology Assessment and the Democratic Model of the Public Understanding of Science," Science and Public Policy26(5): 313-19.
9.
Durant, J.R., Evans, G.A. and Thomas, G.P. ( 1989) "The Public Understanding of Science," Nature340: 11-14.
10.
Elam, M. and Bertilsson, M. ( 2003) "Consuming, Engaging and Confronting Science-The Emerging Dimensions of Scientific Citizenship," European Journal of Social Theory6(2): 233-51.
11.
Evans, G. and Durant, J. ( 1995) "The Relationship between Knowledge and Attitudes in the Public Understanding of Science in Britain," Public Understanding of Science4: 57-74.
12.
Gaskell, G., Stares, S., Allansdottir, A., Allum, N., Corchero, C., Fischler, C., Hampel, J., Jackson, J., Kronberger, N., Mejlgaard, N., Revuelta, G., Schreiner, C., Torgersen, H. and Wagner, W. ( 2006) Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and Trends (Final Report on Eurobarometer 64.3): A Report to the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research. Brussels: Directorate General for Research, European Commission.
13.
Gibbons, M. ( 1999) "Science’s New Social Contract with Society," Nature402(6761): C81-C84.
14.
Goul Andersen, J. ( 2004) Et ganske levende demokrati (A democracy rather alive) . Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag .
15.
Hagendijk, R.P. ( 2004) "The Public Understanding of Science and Public Participation in Regulated Worlds," Minerva42(1): 41-59.
16.
Healey, P. ( 1999) "Popularising Science for the Sake of the Economy: The UK Experience," in R. Miettinen (ed.) Biotechnology and Public Understanding of Science-Proceedings of the UK-Nordic Co-operative Seminar, Helsinki October 25-27, 1998. Helsinki: Academy of Finland.
17.
Horst, M. ( 2007) "Public Expectations of Gene Therapy: Scientific Futures and their Performative Effects on Scientific Citizenship," Science, Technology and Human Values32(2): 150-71.
18.
Irwin, A. ( 2001) "Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences," Public Understanding of Science10(1): 1-18.
19.
Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. New York: Routledge.
20.
Joss, S. and Durant, J. (eds) (1995) Public Participation in Science-The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum.
21.
Jöreskog, K.G. and Moustaki, I. ( 2001) "Factor analysis of ordinal variables: a comparison of three approaches." Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36: 347-387.
22.
Kuha, J. ( 2004) "AIC and BIC-Comparisons of Assumptions and Performance ," Sociological Methods and Research33(2): 188-229.
23.
Lazarsfeld, P.F. and Henry, N.W. ( 1968) Latent Structure Analysis. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
24.
McKennell, A.C. ( 1977) "Attitude Scale Construction," in C.A. O’Muircheartaigh and C. Payne (eds) The Analysis of Survey Data, pp. 183-220. Chichester : John Wiley.
25.
Michael, M. and Brown, N. ( 2005) "Scientific Citizenships: Self-representations of Xenotransplantation’s Publics," Science as Culture14(1): 39-57.
26.
Miller, J.D. ( 1983) The American People and Science Policy: The Role of Public Attitudes in the Policy Process. NewYork: Pergamon Press.
27.
Miller, J.D. ( 1998) "The Measurement of Civic Scientific Literacy," Public Understanding of Science7: 203-23
28.
Miller, J.D. and Kimmel, L.G. ( 2001) Biomedical Communications-Purposes, Audiences and Strategies . San Diego, CA: Academic Press .
29.
Miller, J.D. and Pardo, R. ( 2000) "Civic Scientific Literacy and Attitude to Science and Technology: A Comparative Analysis of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada," in M. Dierkes and C. von Grote (eds) Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology, pp. 81-129. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
30.
Miller, S. ( 2001) "Public Understanding of Science at the Crossroads," Public Understanding of Science10(1): 115-20.
31.
Pardo, R. and Calvo, F. ( 2004) "The Cognitive Dimension of Public Perceptions of Science: Methodological Issues," Public Understanding of Science13: 203-27
32.
Pardo, R., Midden, C. and Miller, J.D. ( 2002) "Attitudes towards Biotechnology in the European Union ," Journal of Biotechnology, 98: 9-24.
33.
Parry, G., Moyser, G. and Day, N. ( 1992) Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Peters, H.P. ( 2000) "From Information to Attitudes? Thoughts on the Relationship between Knowledge about Science and Technology and Attitudes toward Technologies ," in M. Dierkes and C. von Grote (eds) Between Understanding and Trust-the Public, Science and Technology, pp. 265-86. Amseterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
35.
Putnam, R.D. ( 1995) "Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital-an interview with Robert Putnam," Journal of Democracy6(1): 65-78.
36.
Royal Society of London (1985) The Public Understanding of Science. London: Royal Society.
37.
Sandel, M.J. ( 1996) Democracy’s Discontent-America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
TNS Opinion & Social (2005) " Special Eurobarometer 224/Wave 63.1. Europeans, Science and Technology," survey requested by Directorate General Research and coordinated by the Directorate General Press and Communication (European Commission), Brussels, June.
39.
Vermunt, J.K., and Magidson, J. ( 2005) Technical Guide for Latent GOLD 4.0: Basic and Advanced . Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations .
