1997: “Your genes,your choices” and public education about the ethical,legal and social issues of the Human Genome Project

Baker A (1997) Your Genes, Your Choices: Exploring the Issues Raised by Genetic Research. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Baker A (1999) Your Genes, Your Choices: Exploring the Issues Raised by Genetic Research [Digital version]. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Available at: https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/yourgenes.pdf

Bandelli A Konijn EA (2013) Science centers and public participation: Methods, strategies, and barriers. Science Communication 35(4): 419–448.

Blanchard J Hiratsuka V (2021) Being in good community: Engagement in support of indigenous sovereignty. The American Journal of Bioethics 21(10): 54–56.

Cortassa C (2016) In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? The eternal recurrence of the public deficit. Public Understanding of Science 25(4): 447–449.

García-Sancho M Leng R Viry G Wong M Vermeulen N Lowe J (2022) The Human Genome Project as a singular episode in the history of genomics. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 52(3): 320–360.

Garver KL Garver B (1991) Eugenics: Past, present, and the future. The American Journal of Human Genetics 59(5): 1109–1118.

Greely H (1998) Legal, ethical, and social issues in human genome research. The Annual Review of Anthropology 27: 473–502.

Huijer M (2003) Reconsidering democracy: History of the Human Genome Project. Science Communication 24(4): 479–502.

Human Genome Program, U.S. Department of Energy (1990) NIH-DOE joint working group on ethical, legal, and social issues established. Human Genome News 2(1): 5.

Human Genome Program, U.S. Department of Energy (1997) Booklet on genetics. Human Genome News 8(3–4): 11.

Kappel K Holmen SJ (2019) Why science communication, and does it work? A taxonomy of science communication aims and a survey of the empirical evidence. Frontiers in Communication 4(55): 1–12.

Kuna J (2001) The Human Genome Project and eugenics: Identifying the impact on individuals with mental retardation. Mental Retardation 39(2): 158–160.

McCain L (2002) Informing technology policy decisions: The US Human Genome Project’s ethical, legal, and social implications programs as a critical case. Technology and Society 24(1–2): 111–132.

McEwen JE Boyer JT Sun KY , et al. (2014) The ethical, legal, and social implications program of the National Human Genome Research Institute: Reflections on an ongoing experiment. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 15(1): 481–505.

Simis MJ Madden H Cacciatore MA Yeo SK (2016) The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science 25(4): 400–414.

Tsosie KS (2021) Inclusion without equity: The need to empower Indigenous genomic data sovereignty in precision health. In: Ludovica L Grønfeldt Winther R (eds) Remapping Race in a Global Context. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 148–154.

Tutt A Ashworth A (2002) The relationship between the roles of BRCA genes in DNA repair and cancer predisposition. Trends in Molecular Science 8: 571–576.

Vanchieri C (1991) Genome project puts ethics first; Moves to set guidelines. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 83(7): 464–465.

Wolfe AJ (2013) Competing with the Soviets: Science, technology, and the state in Cold War America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.