COVID scientists as rhetorical citizens: Persuasive op-eds and public debate over science policy

Abstract

To discover the means of persuasion available to experts who embrace the responsibility of public communication in times of crisis, this study uses a text/countertext method of rhetorical analysis on U.S. newspaper editorials by scientists writing about COVID-19 policy. Model arguments to opposition audiences on pandemic restrictions and vaccine policy were selected for close reading. We examined how writers in a pro-con debate in a centrist newspaper appealed mainly to like-minded readers, failing to make arguments designed to change the opinions of those who did not already agree with them. The lack of rhetorical sensitivity in these editorials suggests a need for scientists to better utilize existing resources of language and argument when addressing opposition audiences. Exemplary editorials to opposition audiences in right-leaning and left-leaning newspapers were then examined to illustrate more promising strategies of public persuasion in highly partisan times.

Keywords

COVID-19 newspaper op-eds opposition audiences persuasion rhetorical analysis scientist-citizens

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abaluck

Kwong

Luby

(2021) We did the research: Masks work, and you should choose a high quality mask if possible. The New York Times, 26 September. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/26/opinion/do-masks-work-for-covid-prevention.html

Aristotle (2004) Rhetoric (Trans. Rhys Roberts

). Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.

Besley

(2016) What’s at risk if scientists don’t think strategically before talking politics. The Conversation, 25 October. Available at: https://theconversation.com/whats-at-risk-if-scientists-dont-think-strategically-before-talking-politics-63797

Bloomfield

(2019) Communication Strategies for Engaging Climate Skeptics: Religion and the Environment. New York, NY: Routledge.

Bloomfield

Van Swol

Chang

Willes

Ahn

(2020) The effects of establishing intimacy and consubstantiality on group discussions about climate change solutions. Science Communication 42(3): 369–394.

Calvillo

Ross

Garcia

RJB

Smelter

Rutchick

(2020) Political ideology predicts perceptions of the threat of COVID-19 (and susceptibility to fake news about it). Social Psychological and Personality Science 11(8): 1119–1128.

Carroll

(2021) Vaccine mandates are coming. Good. The New York Times, 28 June. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/28/opinion/covid-vaccine-mandate.html

Ceccarelli

(2025) ‘We feel that it is no longer possible to remain uninvolved’: A rhetorical history of the Union of Concerned Scientists. In: Pietrucci

Ceccarelli

(eds) Scientists, Politics, and Public Controversy. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Ceccarelli

Syfert

(2023) Climate scientists as rhetorical citizens: Public argumentation in persuasive op-eds. In: Boogaart

Garssen

Jansen

Van Leeuwen

Pilgram

Reuneker

(eds) Proceedings of the Tenth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Leiden: Sic Sat, pp. 196–204.

10.

Coleman

(2023) The U.S. vaccine tracker. Morning Consult, 16 March. Available at: https://pro.morningconsult.com/trackers/covid-19-vaccine-adoption-tracker

11.

Coleman

(2017) Rhetorical logic bombs and the fragmented online publics of vaccine science. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric 7(4): 203–216.

12.

Coleman

(2018) The role of patience in arguments about vaccine science. Western Journal of Communication 82(4): 513–528.

13.

Condit

Lynch

Winderman

(2012) Recent rhetorical studies in public understanding of science: Multiple purposes and strengths. Public Understanding of Science 21(4): 386–400.

14.

Curran

(2020) Opinion: This is not the time for a chicken pox party. The Cincinnati Enquirer, 29 April. Available at: https://www.cincinnati.com/story/opinion/2020/04/28/opinion-not-time-chicken-pox-party/3022129001/

15.

Danisch

(2011) Risk assessment as rhetorical practice: The ironic mathematics behind terrorism, banking, and public policy. Public Understanding of Science 22(2): 236–251.

16.

Dominguez

Lafita

Matea

(2017) Taking climate change seriously: An analysis of op-ed articles in Spanish press. Public Understanding of Science 26(7): 861–871.

17.

Douglas

(2009) Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

18.

Fahnestock

(2020) Rhetorical citizenship and the science of science communication. Argumentation 34(3): 371–387.

19.

Faust

Mayes

Gounder

(2021) Covid is a greater risk to young people than the vaccines. The New York Times, 4 July. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/04/opinion/covid-vaccine-kids-risks.html

20.

Frickel

Tormos-Aponte

(2023) Science activism is surging—Which marks a culture shift among scientists. The Conversation, 6 July. Available at: https://theconversation.com/science-activism-is-surging-which-marks-a-culture-shift-among-scientists-207454

21.

Gandhi

Noble

(2021) The pandemic’s toll on teen mental health. The Wall Street Journal, 10 June. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-pandemics-toll-on-teen-mental-health-11623344542

22.

Goodwin

(2015) Climate scientist Stephen Schneider versus the sceptics: A case study of argumentation in deep disagreement. In: van Eemeren

, et al (eds) Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat, pp. 489–497.

23.

Gottlieb

(2021) The case for vaccine “passports.” The Wall Street Journal, 11 April. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-case-for-vaccine-passports-11618174364

24.

Gross

(1994) The role of rhetoric in the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science 3(1): 3–23.

25.

Habel

(2012) Following the opinion leaders? The dynamics of influence among media opinion, the public, and politicians. Political Communication 29(3): 257–277.

26.

Huff

Frost

Stein

(2020) Pediatrics experts: Intentionally exposing kids to coronavirus “dangerous.” The Cincinnati Enquirer, 29 April. Available at: https://www.cincinnati.com/story/opinion/2020/04/29/opinion-virus-not-severe-young-people-but-no-means-benign/3051815001/

27.

Jasinski

(2001) Sourcebook on Rhetoric: Key Concepts in Contemporary Rhetorical Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

28.

Johnson

(2016) ‘A man’s mouth is his castle’: The midcentury fluoridation controversy and the visceral public. Quarterly Journal of Speech 102(1): 1–20.

29.

Johnson

Xenos

(2019) Building better bridges: Toward a transdisciplinary science communication. Technical Communication Quarterly 28(2): 112–123.

30.

Jones

(2021) Democratic, republican confidence in science diverges. Gallup, 16 July. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/352397/democratic-republican-confidence-science-diverges.aspx

31.

Kahan

(2015) Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Advances in Political Psychology 36(1): 1–43.

32.

Kowalchuk

McLaughlin

(2009) Mapping the social space of opinion: Public Sociology and the op-ed in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology 34(3): 697–728.

33.

Ladapo

(2021) An American epidemic of “Covid mania.” The Wall Street Journal, 19 April. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/an-american-epidemic-of-covid-mania-11618871457

34.

Leff

(1986) Textual criticism: The legacy of G. P. Mohrmann. Quarterly Journal of Speech 72(4): 377–389.

35.

Leff

(1992) Things made by words: Reflections on textual criticism. Quarterly Journal of Speech 78(2): 223–231.

36.

Linskey

Diamond

Pager

(2021) Republicans seek to make vaccine passports the next battle in the pandemic culture wars. The Washington Post, 30 March. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-vaccine-passports-desantis/2021/03/30/eeb41124-9171-11eb-9668-89be11273c09_story.html

37.

Lynch

Zoller

(2015) Recognizing differences and commonalities: The rhetoric of health and medicine and critical-interpretive health communication. Communication Quarterly 63(5): 498–503.

38.

Lysaght

Kerridge

(2012) Rhetoric, power and legitimacy: A critical analysis of the public policy disputes surrounding stem cell research in Australia (2005-6). Public Understanding of Science 21(2): 195–210.

39.

Makary

(2021) The power of natural immunity. The Wall Street Journal, 8 June. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-power-of-natural-immunity-11623171303

40.

Mando

(2022) Scientist citizens: Nontraditional and alternative approaches to scientific communication. In: Hanganu-Bresch

Zerbe

Cutrufello

Maci

(eds) The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 235–244.

41.

Mann

Schleifer

(2019) Love the science, hate the scientists: Conservative identity protects belief in science and undermines trust in scientists. Social Forces 99(1): 305–332.

42.

Moore

(2009) Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945-1975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

43.

Motta

Stecula

Farhart

(2020) How right-leaning media coverage of COVID-19 facilitated the spread of misinformation in the early stages of the pandemic in the U.S. Canadian Journal of Political Science 53(2): 335–342.

44.

Murphy

(2022) Reconsidering the role of scientific research in anti-toxics rhetoric through perspective by incongruity. Western Journal of Communication 87(3): 489–507.

45.

National Academy of Sciences (2017) Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

46.

Neville-Shepard

(2019) Post-presumption argumentation and the post-truth world: On the conspiracy rhetoric of Donald Trump. Argumentation and Advocacy 55(3): 175–193.

47.

Pielke RA Jr (2007) The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

48.

Pietrucci

Ceccarelli

(2019) Scientist citizens: Rhetoric and responsibility in L’Aquila. Rhetoric and Public Affairs 22(1): 95–128.

49.

Rubinstein

(2020) Opinion: I want my kids to get coronavirus—And you should too. The Cincinnati Enquirer, 16 April. Available at: https://www.cincinnati.com/story/opinion/2020/04/16/opinion-want-my-kids-get-coronavirus-and-you-should-too/5137706002/

50.

Saphier

(2021) Dr. Fauci, tear off these masks. The Wall Street Journal, 2 April. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/dr-fauci-tear-off-these-masks-11617387381

51.

Thålin

(2021) Vaccine policy should consider the power of “hybrid immunity.” The New York Times, 28 October. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/28/opinion/covid-vaccine-hybrid-natural-immunity.html

52.

Vosoughi

Roy

Aral

(2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380): 1146–1151.

53.

Walsh

(2013) Scientists as Prophets: A Rhetorical Genealogy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

54.

Walsh

(2017) Understanding the rhetoric of climate science debates. WIREs Climate Change 8: 1–7.

55.

Zerbe

(2019) Paging Paul Krugman: Toward a topoi of an exemplar public intellectual in natural and physical sciences. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 49(1): 70–104.