This study examines how scientific literacy dimensions—nature of science understanding, scientific reasoning, positive beliefs about science, and interest in science—are related to willingness to participate in medical research, mediated by conspiracy beliefs about and trust in medical researchers. Survey data were collected from a sample of 600 Slovaks recruited via an online panel. Regression-based mediation analysis revealed that positive beliefs about science and interest in science exhibited total and indirect associations with willingness to participate in medical research. By contrast, nature of science understanding and scientific reasoning were related to willingness to participate in medical research only indirectly. The indirect pathways of all scientific literacy dimensions operated through conspiracy beliefs about and trust in medical researchers, with trust showing the strongest positive association with willingness to participate in medical research. These findings highlight that the association between scientific literacy and willingness to participate in medical research is rather complex, mediated by beliefs about medical researchers. Addressing these beliefs alongside scientific literacy promotion may enhance public willingness to participate in medical research.
AbadieRHeaneyK (2015) “We can wipe an entire culture”: Fears and promises of DNA biobanking among Native Americans. Dialectical Anthropology39: 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-015-9391-4
2.
Abd-El-KhalickFLedermanNG (2023) Research on teaching, learning, and assessment of nature of science. In: LedermanNGZeidlerDLLedermanJS (eds) Handbook of Research on Science Education: Volume III. Routledge, pp.850–898. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855758-32
3.
AbdelhafizASAbd ElHafeezSKhalilMA, et al. (2021) Factors influencing participation in COVID-19 clinical trials: A multi-national study. Frontiers in Medicine8: 608959. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.608959
4.
AbelesATHariKManentoC, et al. (2023) Public engagement with biomedical science: An analysis of Black, Hispanic, and general Population adults in the United States. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.15.530692
5.
ArmstrongTDCrumLDRiegerRH, et al. (1999) Attitudes of African Americans toward participation in medical research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology29(3): 552–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01401.x
6.
BašnákováJČavojováVŠrolJ (2021) Does concrete content help people to reason scientifically? Adaptation of Scientific Reasoning Scale. Science & Education30(4): 809–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00207-0
7.
BassSBD’AvanzoPAlhajjiM, et al. (2020) Exploring the engagement of racial and ethnic minorities in HIV treatment and vaccine clinical trials: A scoping review of literature and implications for future research. AIDS Patient Care and Stds34(9): 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2020.0008
8.
BeniermannAMecklenburgLUpmeierzuBelzenA (2021) Reasoning on controversial science issues in science education and science communication. Education Sciences11(9): 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090522
9.
BlankenshipBTDavisTAreguinMA, et al. (2021) Trust and tribulation: Racial identity centrality, institutional trust, and support for candidates in the 2020 US presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy21(1): 64–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12256
10.
BleakleyAMaloneyEKYoungDG, et al. (2023) Spillover effects of COVID-19 news coverage on willingness to participate in medical research in a diverse sample of US older adults. Communication Research. Epub ahead of print 19 November. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231210416
11.
BordignonF (2023) Alternative science, alternative experts, alternative politics. The roots of pseudoscientific beliefs in Western Europe. Journal of Contemporary European Studies31(4): 1469–1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2023.2177838
BrallCBerlinCZwahlenM, et al. (2021) Public willingness to participate in personalized health research and biobanking: A large-scale Swiss survey. PLoS One16(4): e0249141. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249141
14.
BrewerLCHayesSNParkerMW, et al. (2014) African American women’s perceptions and attitudes regarding participation in medical research: The Mayo Clinic/The Links, Incorporated partnership. Journal of Women’s Health23(8): 681–687. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2014.4751
15.
BrothertonRFrenchCCPickeringAD (2013) Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. Frontiers in Psychology4: 279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
16.
ČavojováVŠrolJBallová MikuškováE (2024) Scientific reasoning is associated with rejection of unfounded health beliefs and adherence to evidence-based regulations during the Covid-19 pandemic. Current Psychology43: 8288–8302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04284-y
17.
CobbEMSingerDCDavisMM (2014) Public interest in medical research participation: Differences by volunteer status and study type. Clinical and Translational Science7(2): 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12142
18.
CobernWWAdamsBAPleasantsBA, et al. (2022) Do we have a trust problem? Exploring undergraduate student views on the tentativeness and trustworthiness of science. Science & Education31: 1209–1238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00292-1
19.
CostaAMFerreiraMEDa Silva LoureiroMJ (2021) Scientific literacy: The conceptual framework prevailing over the first decade of the twenty-first century. Revista Colombiana de Educación81: 195–228. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num81-10293
20.
CottlerLBStrileyCWO’LearyCC, et al. (2013) Engaging the community in research with the HealthStreet model: National and international perspectives. In:AlvingBDaiKChanSHH (eds) Translational Medicine–What, Why, and How: An International Perspective. Karger, pp. 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1159/000343144
21.
DouglasKMSuttonRM (2023) What are conspiracy theories? A definitional approach to their correlates, consequences, and communication. Annual Review of Psychology74: 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329
22.
DrummondCFischhoffB (2015) Development and validation of the scientific reasoning scale. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making30(1): 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1906
23.
DykemaJJonesCPGarbarskiD, et al. (2022) Exploring the relationship between medical research literacy and respondents’ expressed likelihood to participate in a clinical trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(22): 15168. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215168
24.
ErcegNRužojčićMGalićZ (2022) Misbehaving in the corona crisis: The role of anxiety and unfounded beliefs. Current Psychology41(8): 5621–5630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01040-4
25.
EvansGDurantJ (1995) The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science4(1): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004
26.
FariasMNewheiserAKKahaneG, et al. (2013) Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology49(6): 1210–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.008
27.
FasceAPicóA (2019) Science as a vaccine: The relation between scientific literacy and unwarranted beliefs. Science & Education28: 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-00022-0
Fernández-CarroRVílchezJEVílchez-GonzálezJM, et al. (2023) Multivariate analysis of beliefs in pseudoscience and superstitions among pre-service teachers in Spain. Science & Education32(4): 909–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00354-y
FüchslinTSchäferMSMetagJ (2019) Who wants to be a citizen scientist? Identifying the potential of citizen science and target segments in Switzerland. Public Understanding of Science28(6): 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519852020
32.
GeorgiouNDelfabbroPBalzanR (2021) Conspiracy theory beliefs, scientific reasoning and the analytical thinking paradox. Applied Cognitive Psychology35(6): 1523–1534. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3885
33.
GrasoMHenwoodAAquinoK, et al. (2022) The dark side of belief in COVID-19 scientists and scientific evidence. Personality and Individual Differences193: 111594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111594
HartmanRODieckmannNFSprengerAM, et al. (2017) Modeling attitudes toward science: Development and validation of the Credibility of Science Scale. Basic and Applied Social Psychology39(6): 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1372284
36.
HayesAF (2022) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. 3rd ed.Guilford Press.
37.
JaffeKNosovaEDeBeckK, et al. (2021) Trust in research physicians as a key dimension of randomized controlled trial participation in clinical addictions research. Substance Abuse42(4): 927–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1900987
38.
JenkinsMMReed-GrossERasmussenSA, et al. (2009) Maternal attitudes toward DNA collection for gene–environment studies: A qualitative research study. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A149(11): 2378–2386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33043
39.
JinHCuiMLiuJ (2020) Factor affecting people’s attitude toward participation in medical research: A systematic review. Current Medical Research and Opinion36(7): 1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2020.1760807
KoetkeJSchumannKBowesSM, et al. (2025) The effect of seeing scientists as intellectually humble on trust in scientists and their research. Nature Human Behaviour9: 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02060-x
42.
KrappAPrenzelM (2011) Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education33(1): 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
43.
KripalaniSGogginsKCoueyC, et al. (2021) Disparities in research participation by level of health literacy. Mayo Clinic Proceedings96(2): 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.06.058
44.
LeeCJScheufeleDALewensteinBV (2005) Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science Communication27(2): 240–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005281474
45.
LeeSKimSH (2018) Scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science in South Korea: Does knowledge lead to favorable attitudes?Science Communication40(2): 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017753189
46.
LiuHPriestS (2009) Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science18(6): 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625
47.
LiuHELiMC (2018) Factors influencing the willingness to participate in medical research: A nationwide survey in Taiwan. PeerJ6: e4874. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4874
48.
LombrozoTThanukosAWeisbergM (2008) The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach1: 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0061-8
49.
LosiL (2023) Who engages with science, and how? An empirical typology of Europeans’ science engagement. Public Understanding of Science32(6): 798–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231164340
50.
MarquesMDKerrJRStukasAA, et al. (2024) The effect of scientific conspiracy theories on scepticism towards biotechnologies. Public Understanding of Science34(5): 646–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241300896
MoffatKRShiWCannonP, et al. (2023) Factors associated with recruitment to randomised controlled trials in general practice: A systematic mixed studies review. Trials24(1): 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06865-x
53.
MottaM (2018) The enduring effect of scientific interest on trust in climate scientists in the United States. Nature Climate Change8(6): 485–488. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0126-9
54.
NatoliEEMarquesMD (2021) The antidepressant hoax: Conspiracy theories decrease health-seeking intentions. British Journal of Social Psychology60(3): 902–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12426
55.
O’BrienTCPalmerRAlbarracinD (2021) Misplaced trust: When trust in science fosters belief in pseudoscience and the benefits of critical evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology96: 104184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104184
56.
OECD (2018) PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework: Reading, Mathematics and Science: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305274-en (accessed 19 May 2024).
57.
PilchITurska-KawaAWardawyP, et al. (2023) Contemporary trends in psychological research on conspiracy beliefs. A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology14: 1075779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1075779
58.
Rodríguez-TorresEGonzález-PérezMMDíaz-PérezC (2021) Barriers and facilitators to the participation of subjects in clinical trials: An overview of reviews. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications23: 100829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100829
59.
RussellSLKatzRVWangMQ, et al. (2011) Belief in AIDS origin conspiracy theory and willingness to participate in biomedical research studies: Findings in Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics in seven cities across two surveys. HIV Clinical Trials12(1): 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1310/hct1201-37
RutjensBTSuttonRMVan der LeeR (2018) Not all skepticism is equal: Exploring the ideological antecedents of science acceptance and rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin44(3): 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217741314
SedlárMGrežoM (2022) Willingness to participate in biobanking: The roles of Big Five personality traits and interpersonal trusting beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences197: 111770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111770
64.
SheridanRMartin-KerryJHudsonJ, et al. (2020) Why do patients take part in research? An overview of systematic reviews of psychosocial barriers and facilitators. Trials21: 259. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4197-3
65.
Skolnick WeisbergDSLandrumARHamiltonJ, et al. (2021) Knowledge about the nature of science increases public acceptance of science regardless of identity factors. Public Understanding of Science30(2): 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520977700
66.
SunyíkVČavojováV (2023) Alternative medicine, COVID-19 conspiracies, and other health-related unfounded beliefs: The role of scientific literacy, analytical thinking, and importance of epistemic rationality. Studia Psychologica65(3): 246–261. https://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2023.03.878
67.
SynakNŠabíkováNMasarykR (2024) Correlations among high school students’ beliefs about conspiracy, authoritarianism, and scientific literacy. Science & Education33(1): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00380-w
68.
TrauthJMMusaDSiminoffL, et al. (2000) Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies. Journal of Health & Social Policy12(2): 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1300/J045v12n02_02
69.
Van MulukomVPummererLJAlperS, et al. (2022) Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine301: 114912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114912
70.
VećkalovBZarzecznaNMcPhetresJ, et al. (2024) Psychological distance to science as a predictor of science skepticism across domains. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin50(1): 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221118184
ZhangDCHighhouseSNyeCD (2019) Development and validation of the General Risk Propensity Scale (GRiPS). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making32(2): 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2102
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
