Developing and employing a ‘responsive manualization’ in the ‘Acupuncture Approaches to Decrease Disparities in Outcomes of Pain Treatment’ comparative effectiveness study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2019
Developing and employing a ‘responsive manualization’ in the ‘Acupuncture Approaches to Decrease Disparities in Outcomes of Pain Treatment’ comparative effectiveness study
The aim of this article is to describe the process used to develop an acupuncture therapy manual for a large effectiveness trial comparing individual care against group care for chronic pain in an underserved population. The design needed to not only ensure research consistency and replicability but also be ‘responsive’ to real world heterogeneous and evolving presentations in challenging physical settings.
Background:
Chronic pain is prevalent in the United States. While acupuncture is effective for chronic pain, minority, ethnically diverse and lower socioeconomic populations have limited access. Group acupuncture is proposed as a lower cost option to facilitate access in safety net settings, but research on the effectiveness of group versus individual acupuncture is lacking.
Methods:
We engaged a modified Delphi process with expert practitioners from diverse backgrounds who were experienced in individual and group practice. All contributions were recorded and collated for second- and third-round consensus discussions that included contributions by the trial’s research acupuncturists.
Results:
A ‘responsive manual’ flow chart was created with suggested sequencing that included interviews concurrent with palpation, Tui na, Gua sha, acupuncture needling, ear treatment, basic recommendations and options for departure with rationale. The manual was implemented by six research acupuncturists in five primary care settings in the Bronx, New York, with weekly team meetings to discuss manual use. There were no serious adverse events (AE) and few minor AE reported in this trial.
Conclusion:
A ‘responsive manual’ can be structured and implemented that is not only consistent and replicable but also flexible to accommodate the real-world clinical needs of practitioners and patients in challenging physical settings.
TickHNielsenAPelletierKR, et al. Evidence-based nonpharmacologic strategies for comprehensive pain care: the Consortium Pain Task Force white paper. Explore2018; 14(3): 177–211.
2.
Institute of Medicine and Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care and Education. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011.
3.
GaskinDJRichardP. The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain2012; 13(8): 715–724.
4.
GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet2016; 388(10053): 1545–1602.
5.
BlackwellDLLucasJWClarkeTC. Summary health statistics for adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2012. Vital Health Statistics Series 10, No. 260. National Center for Health Statistics, 2014. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_260.pdf (accessed 14 January 2017).
6.
Grol-ProkopczykH. Sociodemographic disparities in chronic pain, based on 12-year longitudinal data. Pain2017; 158(2): 313–322.
7.
TaitRCChibnallJT. Racial/ethnic disparities in the assessment and treatment of pain: psychosocial perspectives. Am Psychol2014; 69(2): 131–141.
8.
AndersonKOGreenCRPayneR. Racial and ethnic disparities in pain: causes and consequences of unequal care. J Pain2009; 10(12): 1187–1204.
9.
VickersAJLindeK. Acupuncture for chronic pain. JAMA2014; 311(9): 955–956.
10.
YuanQLWangPLiuL, et al. Acupuncture for musculoskeletal pain: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of sham-controlled randomized clinical trials. Sci Rep2016; 6: 30675.
11.
MacPhersonHVickersABlandM, et al. Acupuncture for chronic pain and depression in primary care: a programme of research. Programme Grants for Appl Res2017; 5(3), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28121095
12.
VickersAJVertosickEALewithG, et al. Acupuncture for chronic pain: update of an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Pain2018; 19(5): 455–474.
13.
LathiaATJungSMChenLX. Efficacy of acupuncture as a treatment for chronic shoulder pain. J Altern Complement Med2009; 15(6): 613–618.
14.
YuanQLGuoTMLiuL, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine for neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE2015; 10(2): e0117146.
15.
TangSMoZZhangR. Acupuncture for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acupunct Med2018; 36(2): 62–70.
16.
ChouRDeyoRFriedlyJ, et al. Nonpharmacologic therapies for low back pain: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med2017; 166(7): 493–505.
17.
WillichSNReinholdTSelimD, et al. Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture treatment in patients with chronic neck pain. Pain2006; 125(1–2): 107–113.
18.
LinXHuangKZhuG, et al. The effects of acupuncture on chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am2016; 98(18): 1578–1585.
19.
ManyangaTFroeseMZarychanskiR, et al. Pain management with acupuncture in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med2014; 14: 312.
20.
LindeKAllaisGBrinkhausB, et al. Acupuncture for the prevention of tension-type headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2016; 4: CD007587.
21.
JiangYBaiPChenH, et al. The effect of acupuncture on the quality of life in patients with migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol2018; 9: 1190.
22.
WuJYZhangCXuYP, et al. Acupuncture therapy in the management of the clinical outcomes for temporomandibular disorders: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine2017; 96(9): e6064.
23.
QaseemAWiltTJMcLeanRM, et al. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med2017; 166(7): 514–530.
24.
NahinRLBoineauRKhalsaPS, et al. Evidence-based evaluation of complementary health approaches for pain management in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc2016; 91(9): 1292–1306.
25.
McKeeMDKliglerBFletcherJ, et al. Outcomes of acupuncture for chronic pain in urban primary care. J Am Board Fam Med2013; 26(6): 692–700.
26.
BeckerWCDorflingerLEdmondSN, et al. Barriers and facilitators to use of non-pharmacological treatments in chronic pain. BMC Fam Pract2017; 18(1): 41.
27.
KliglerBNielsenAKohrrerC, et al. Acupuncture therapy in a group setting for chronic pain. Pain Med2018; 19: 393–403.
28.
TofthagenCBosesSHealyG, et al. Evaluation of group acupuncture for cancer-related symptoms: a retrospective analysis. J Palliat Med2015; 18(10): 878–880.
29.
WhiteARichardsonMRichmondP, et al. Group acupuncture for knee pain: evaluation of a cost-saving initiative in the health service. Acupunct Med2012; 30(3): 170–175.
30.
AspreyAPatersonCWhiteA. ‘All in the same boat’: a qualitative study of patients’ attitudes and experiences in group acupuncture clinics. Acupunct Med2012; 30(3): 163–169.
31.
KliglerBBuonoraMGabisonJ, et al. ‘I felt like it was God’s hands putting the needles in’: a qualitative analysis of the experience of acupuncture for chronic pain in a low-income, ethnically diverse, and medically underserved patient population. J Altern Complement Med2015; 21(11): 713–719.
32.
ChuangEMcKeeMDAndersonB, et al. Predictors of acupuncture treatment initiation and retention in a medically underserved population. In: Paper presented at 2017 North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG) annual meeting, Montreal, QC, Canada, 17–21 November 2017.
33.
ChuangEHashaiNBuonoraM, et al. ‘It’s better in a group anyway’: patient experiences of group and individual acupuncture. J Altern Complement Med2018; 24(4): 336–342.
34.
McKeeMDNielsenAAndersonB, et al. Comparison of individual to group delivery of acupuncture therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain in urban primary care. 2019; manuscript submitted for publication.
35.
CraigPDieppePMacintyreS, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ2008; 337: a1655.
36.
SchnyerRNAllenJJ. Bridging the gap in complementary and alternative medicine research: manualization as a means of promoting standardization and flexibility of treatment in clinical trials of acupuncture. J Altern Complement Med2002; 8(5): 623–634.
37.
MacPhersonHSchroerS. Acupuncture as a complex intervention for depression: a consensus method to develop a standardised treatment protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Complement Ther Med2007; 15(2): 92–100.
38.
CitkovitzC. Acupuncture during stroke rehabilitation: development of a manual for researching a complex intervention. PhD Dissertation, University of Westminster, London, 2015.
39.
SchnyerRNIulianoDKayJ, et al. Development of protocols for randomized sham-controlled trials of complex treatment interventions: Japanese acupuncture for endometriosis-related pelvic pain. J Altern Complement Med2008; 14(5): 515–522.
40.
HsuCCSandfordBA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval2007; 12(10): 1–8.
41.
NielsenACitkovitzCAndersonB, et al. Poster abstract: ‘responsive manualization’ of acupuncture therapy for chronic pain in urban primary care settings. In:
Society for Acupuncture Research conference 2015, Boston, MA, 12–14 November 2015.
42.
WittCMHuangWJLaoL, et al. Which research is needed to support clinical decision-making on integrative medicine? Can comparative effectiveness research close the gap?Chin J Integr Med2012; 18(10): 723–729.
43.
MacPhersonHShermanKHammerschlagR, et al. The clinical evaluation of traditional East Asian systems of medicine. Clin Acup Orient Med2002; 3(1): 16–19.
44.
NielsenA. Gua sha, a traditional technique for modern practice. 2nd ed.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, 2013.
45.
FinandoDFinandoS. Informed touch: a clinician’s guide to the evaluation and treatment of myofascial disorders. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions/Bear. 1999.
46.
LangevinHMChurchillDLWuJ, et al. Evidence of connective tissue involvement in acupuncture. FASEB J2002; 16(8): 872–874.
47.
KwonSLeeYParkHJ, et al. Coarse needle surface potentiates analgesic effect elicited by acupuncture with twirling manipulation in rats with nociceptive pain. BMC Complement Altern Med2017; 17(1): 1.
48.
PritchardS. Tui na: the Chinese massage manual. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2009.
49.
KwongKKKloetzerLWongKK, et al. Bioluminescence imaging of heme oxygenase-1 upregulation in the Gua Sha procedure. J Vis Exp2009; 30: pii: 1385.
50.
de LorentLAgorastosAYassouridisA, et al. Auricular acupuncture versus progressive muscle relaxation in patient with anxiety disorders or major depressive disorder: a prospective parallel group clinical trial. J Acupunct Meridian Stud2016; 9(4): 191–199.
51.
YehCHChiangYCHoffmanSL, et al. Efficacy of auricular therapy for pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2014; 2014: 934670.
52.
WittCMPachDBrinkhausB, et al. Safety of acupuncture: results of a prospective observational study with 229,230 patients and introduction of a medical information and consent form. Forsch Komplementmed2009; 16(2): 91–97.
53.
MacPhersonHThomasKWaltersS, et al. A prospective survey of adverse events and treatment reactions following 34,000 consultations with professional acupuncturists. Acupunct Med2001; 19(2): 93–102.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
