To determine the changes produced by trigger point dry needling (TrP-DN) of sternocleidomastoid in patients with neck pain, and to observe how it might modify cervical motor control (CMC).
Participants were recruited through advertising. The duration of the study was 6 months.
Subjects:
Thirty-four subjects with non-specific neck pain, aged over 18 years with an active myofascial trigger point in sternocleidomastoid, participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to treatment or control groups.
Methods:
TrP-DN inside or (1.5 cm) outside of the active myofascial trigger point of sternocleidomastoid.
Main outcome measures:
CMC, visual analogue scale and cervical range of motion were assessed before treatment, immediately post treatment, and 24 h, 1 week and 1 month after the intervention; the neck disability index was evaluated before treatment and 1 month later.
Results:
With a confidence interval of 99%, TrP-DN of sternocleidomastoid was associated with a decrease in pain after 1 week and CMC improved 1 month after the intervention (p < 0.001), when compared with baseline measurements, within the experimental group; there were no statistically significant differences between experimental and control groups.
Conclusion:
The effects of TrP-DN inside and outside of active myofascial trigger points did not differ in this study. Both interventions were associated with a similar temporal effect, specifically a reduction in neck pain at 1 week and an increase CMC at 1 month. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the lack of a contemporaneous untreated control group.
ChildsJDClelandJAElliottJM, et al. Neck pain. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther2008; 38: A1–A34.
2.
Cerezo-TéllezELacombaMTFuentes-GallardoI, et al. Dry needling of the trapezius muscle in office workers with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther2016; 24: 223–232.
3.
Cerezo-TéllezETorres-LacombaMMayoral-del MoralO, et al. Prevalence of myofascial pain syndrome in chronic non-specific neck pain: a population-based cross-sectional descriptive study. Pain Med2016; 17: 2369–2377.
4.
Llamas-RamosRPecos-MartínDGallego-IzquierdoT, et al. Comparison of the short-term outcomes between trigger point dry needling and trigger point manual therapy for the management of chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther2014; 44: 852–861.
5.
Pecos-MartínDMontañez-AguileraFJGallego-IzquierdoT, et al. Effectiveness of dry needling on the lower trapezius in patients with mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015; 96: 775–781.
6.
JullGFallaD.Does increased superficial neck flexor activity in the craniocervical flexion test reflect reduced deep flexor activity in people with neck pain. Man Ther2016; 25: 43–47.
7.
MeisingsetIStensdotterAKWoodhouseA, et al. Neck motion, motor control, pain and disability: a longitudinal study of associations in neck pain patients in physiotherapy treatment. Man Ther2016; 22: 94–100.
8.
MeisingsetIWoodhouseAStensdotterAK, et al. Evidence for a general stiffening motor control pattern in neck pain: a cross sectional study Pathophysiology of musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2015; 16: 1–14.
9.
ChristensenSWHirataRPGraven-NielsenT.The effect of experimental neck pain on pressure pain sensitivity and axioscapular motor control. J Pain2015; 16(4): 367–379.
10.
De MeulemeesterKECasteleinBCoppietersI, et al. Comparing trigger point dry needling and manual pressure technique for the management of myofascial neck/shoulder pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2017; 40: 11–20.
11.
ZiaeifarMArabAMKarimiN, et al. The effect of dry needling on pain, pressure pain threshold and disability in patients with a myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle. J Bodyw Mov Ther2014; 18: 298–305.
12.
BobosPBillisEPapanikolaouD-T, et al. Does deep cervical flexor muscle training affect pain pressure thresholds of myofascial trigger points in patients with chronic neck pain? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Rehabil Res Pract2016; 2016: 6480826.
13.
SchulzKFAltmanDGMoherD.CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med2010; 152: 726–732.
14.
MyburghCLauridsenHHLarsenAH, et al. Standardized manual palpation of myofascial trigger points in relation to neck/shoulder pain; the influence of clinical experience on inter-examiner reproducibility. Man Ther2011; 16: 136–140.
15.
SimonsDG.Review of enigmatic MTrPs as a common cause of enigmatic musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2004; 14(1): 95–107.
16.
SimonsDTravellJSimonsSL, et al. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual. Philadelphia, PA: LWW, 1999.
17.
Calvo-LoboCPacheco-da-CostaSMartínez-MartínezJ, et al. Dry needling on the infraspinatus latent and active myofascial trigger points in older adults with nonspecific shoulder pain. J Geriatr Phys Ther2018; 41: 1–13.
HongCZ.Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1994; 73(4): 256–263.
20.
HsiehYLKaoMJKuanTS, et al. Dry needling to a key myofascial trigger point may reduce the irritability of satellite MTrPs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2007; 86: 397–403.
21.
Martín-Pintado-ZugastiAPecos-MartinDRodríguez-FernándezÁL, et al. Ischemic compression after dry needling of a latent myofascial trigger point reduces postneedling soreness intensity and duration. PM R2015; 7: 1026–1034.
22.
RevelMAndre-DeshaysCMinguetM.Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with cervical pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1991; 72: 288–291.
23.
JørgensenRRisIFallaD, et al. Reliability, construct and discriminative validity of clinical testing in subjects with and without chronic neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2014; 15: 408.
24.
ScottJHuskissonEC.Graphic representation of pain. Pain1976; 2(2): 175–184.
25.
LaucheRLanghorstJDobosGJ, et al. Clinically meaningful differences in pain, disability and quality of life for chronic nonspecific neck pain – a reanalysis of 4 randomized controlled trials of cupping therapy. Complement Ther Med2013; 21: 342–347.
26.
MacDermidJCWaltonDMAveryS, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther2009; 39: 400–417.
27.
FletcherJPBandyWD.Intrarater reliability of CROM measurement of cervical spine active range of motion in persons with and without neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2008; 38(10): 640–645.
28.
CohenJ.A power primer. Psychol Bull1992; 112: 155–159.
29.
Bodes-PardoGPecos-MartínDGallego-IzquierdoT, et al. Manual treatment for cervicogenic headache and active trigger point in the sternocleidomastoid muscle: a pilot randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2013; 36: 403–411.
30.
Sarig BahatHWeissPLTSprecherE, et al. Do neck kinematics correlate with pain intensity, neck disability or with fear of motion?Man Ther2014; 19: 252–258.
31.
Mejuto-VázquezMJSalom-MorenoJOrtega-SantiagoR, et al. Short-term changes in neck pain, widespread pressure pain sensitivity, and cervical range of motion after the application of trigger point dry needling in patients with acute mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther2014; 44: 252–260.
32.
SterlingMJullGWrightA.Cervical mobilisation: concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity. Man Ther2001; 6(2): 72–81.
33.
FallaDLindstrømRRechterL, et al. Effectiveness of an 8-week exercise programme on pain and specificity of neck muscle activity in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Pain2013; 17: 1517–1528.
34.
PalmgrenPJSandströmPJLundqvistFJ, et al. Improvement after chiropractic care in cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and subjective pain intensity in patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2006; 29: 100–106.
35.
HalleJSHalleRJ.Pertinent dry needling considerations for minimizing adverse effects – part two. Int J Sports Phys Ther2016; 11(5): 810–819.
36.
HalleJSHalleRJ.Pertinent dry needling considerations for minimizing adverse effects – part one. Int J Sports Phys Ther2016; 11(4): 651–662.
