Comparison of dry needling and ischaemic compression techniques on pain and function in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a randomised clinical trial

Abstract

Background:

To compare the effectiveness of ischaemic compression (IC) applied directly to the knee versus dry needling (DN) with respect to pain, functional status and sensitivity to mechanical stimulation of vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS).

Methods:

A total of 54 patients with unilateral PFPS aged 20–30 years were selected randomly from patients referred to physical therapy clinics of Babol University of Medical Sciences in Iran. Twenty-seven patients were allocated to either IC or DN groups. Three sessions of treatment were applied over 1 week with follow-up at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. Primary outcome measures comprised the Kujala questionnaire score for functional status, numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) for pain intensity and pressure pain threshold (PPT) for sensitivity to mechanical stimulation; these were measured and recorded before treatment and 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after the last treatment session.

Results:

There were no statistically significant differences in the between-group comparisons of any variables at the various follow-up points. Both groups (n = 27 participants each) had significant improvements (p < 0.05) in pain, functional status and PPT values at follow-up.

Conclusions:

There were no differences in markers of pain, function or pressure sensitivity over a 3-month follow-up period between patients with PFPS treated with DN and IC. Temporal improvements in both groups suggested that the two techniques may be similarly effective for the treatment of PFPS.

Keywords

dry needling ischaemic compression myofascial trigger point patellofemoral pain syndrome rehabilitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rothermich

Glaviano

, et al. Patellofemoral pain: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment options. Clin Sports Med 2015; 34(2): 313–327.

Witvrouw

Lysens

Bellemans

, et al. Open versus closed kinetic chain exercises for patellofemoral pain. A prospective, randomized study. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28: 687–694.

Chaitow

LDJ

. Clinical application of neuromuscular techniques: the lower body, vol. 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston, 2002, p. 610.

Powers

Landel

Perry

Timing and intensity of vastus muscle activity during functional activities in subjects with and without patellofemoral pain. Phys Ther 1996; 76(9): 946–955; discussion 956–967.

Crossley

Bennell

Green

, et al. Physical therapy for patellofemoral pain: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30(6): 857–865.

Crossley

Bennell

Cowan

, et al. Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85(5): 815–822.

Miao

Pan

, et al. Vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis activity during a double-leg semisquat with or without hip adduction in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 289.

Behrangrad

Kamali

Comparison of ischemic compression and lumbopelvic manipulation as trigger point therapy for patellofemoral pain syndrome in young adults: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2017; 21(3): 554–564.

Pattyn

Verdonk

Steyaert

, et al. Vastus medialis obliquus atrophy: does it exist in patellofemoral pain syndrome? Am J Sports Med 2011; 39(7): 1450–1455.

10.

Cowan

Bennell

Hodges

, et al. Delayed onset of electromyographic activity of vastus medialis obliquus relative to vastus lateralis in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 183–189.

11.

Nguyen

BM.

Myofascial trigger point, falls in the elderly, idiopathic knee pain and osteoarthritis: an alternative concept. Med Hypotheses 2013; 80(6): 806–809.

12.

Kalichman

Vulfsons

Dry needling in the management of musculoskeletal pain. J Am Board Fam Med 2010; 23: 640–646.

13.

Kietrys

Palombaro

Azzaretto

, et al. Effectiveness of dry needling for upper-quarter myofascial pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013; 43(9): 620–634.

14.

Llamas-Ramos

Pecos-Martin

Gallego-Izquierdo

, et al. Comparison of the short-term outcomes between trigger point dry needling and trigger point manual therapy for the management of chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44(11): 852–861.

15.

Zuil-Escobar

Martínez-Cepa

Martín-Urrialde

, et al. The prevalence of latent myofascial trigger points in lower limb muscles in asymptomatic subjects. PMRJ 2016; 8: 1055–1064.

16.

Hoyle

Marras

Sheedy

, et al. Effects of postural and visual stressors on myofascial trigger point development and motor unit rotation during computer work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2011; 21(1): 41–48.

17.

Dommerholt

Dry needling – peripheral and central considerations. J Man Manip Ther 2011; 19(4): 223–227.

18.

Dippenaar

. The association between myofascial trigger points of the quadriceps femoris muscle and the clinical presentation of patellofemoral pain syndrome using a piloted patellofemoral pain severity scale. Master’s Degree in Technology dissertation, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2003.

19.

Lucas

KR.

The impact of latent trigger points on regional muscle function. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2008; 12(5): 344–349.

20.

Smith

KLF

. The role of and relationship between hamstring and quadriceps muscle myofascial trigger points in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Master’s Degree in Technology dissertation, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2012.

21.

Simons

DG.

Understanding effective treatments of myofascial trigger points. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2002; 6: 81–88.

22.

Peters

Tyson

NL.

Proximal exercises are effective in treating patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2013; 8(5): 689–700.

23.

Earl

Hoch

AZ.

A proximal strengthening program improves pain, function, and biomechanics in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39(1): 154–163.

24.

Garcia

Azevedo

Alves

, et al. Effects of electrical stimulation of vastus medialis obliquus muscle in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: an electromyographic analysis. Rev Bras Fisioter 2010; 14(6): 477–482.

25.

Hillermann

Gomes

Korporaal

, et al. A pilot study comparing the effects of spinal manipulative therapy with those of extra-spinal manipulative therapy on quadriceps muscle strength. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006; 29(2): 145–149.

26.

De Meulemeester

Castelein

Coppieters

, et al. Comparing trigger point dry needling and manual pressure technique for the management of myofascial neck/shoulder pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2017; 40(1): 11–20.

27.

De-la-Llave-Rincon

Loa-Barbero

Palacios-Cena

, et al. Manual therapy combined with dry needling for the management of patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Man Ther 2016; 25: 157–169.

28.

Ricards

LD.

The effectiveness of non-invasive treatments for active myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Osteopath Med 2006; 9: 120–136.

29.

Gotlin

RS.

Effective rehabilitation for anterior knee pain. J Musculoskel Med 2000; 17: 421–432.

30.

Espi-Lopez

Serra-Ano

Vicent-Ferrando

, et al. Effectiveness of inclusion of dry needling in a multimodal therapy program for patellofemoral pain: a randomized parallel-group trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017; 47(6): 392–401.

31.

Velazquez-Saornil

Ruiz-Ruiz

Rodriguez-Sanz

, et al. Efficacy of quadriceps vastus medialis dry needling in a rehabilitation protocol after surgical reconstruction of complete anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Medicine 2017; 96(17): e6726.

32.

Cagnie

Castelein

Pollie

, et al. Evidence for the use of ischemic compression and dry needling in the management of trigger points of the upper trapezius in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 94(7): 573–583.

33.

Negahban

Pouretezad

Yazdi

, et al. Persian translation and validation of the Kujala patellofemoral scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Disabil Rehabil 2012; 34(26): 2259–2263.

34.

Lee

Kim

, et al. Pain relief scale is more highly correlated with numerical rating scale than with visual analogue scale in chronic pain patients. Pain Physician 2015; 18(2): E195–E200.

35.

Pelfort

Torres-Claramunt

Sanchez-Soler

, et al. Pressure algometry is a useful tool to quantify pain in the medial part of the knee: an intra- and inter-reliability study in healthy subjects. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2015; 101(5): 559–563.

36.

Gerwin

Shannon

Hong

, et al. Interrater reliability in myofascial trigger point examination. Pain 1997; 69(1–2): 65–73.

37.

Myburgh

Lauridsen

Larsen

, et al. Standardized manual palpation of myofascial trigger points in relation to neck/shoulder pain; the influence of clinical experience on inter-examiner reproducibility. Man Ther 2011; 16(2): 136–140.

38.

Sanz

Lobo

Lopez

, et al. Interrater reliability in the clinical evaluation of myofascial trigger points in three ankle muscles. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2016; 39(9): 623–634.

39.

Hains

Patellofemoral pain syndrome managed by ischemic compression to the trigger points located in the peri-patellar and retro-patellar areas: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Chiropr 2010; 13: 201–209.

40.

Weyer-Henderson

An investigation into the effectiveness of dry needling of myofascial trigger points on total work and other recorded measurements of the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles in patellofemoral pain syndrome in long distance runners. Master’s Degree in Technology dissertation, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2005.