Non-specific effects of acupuncture and sham acupuncture in clinical trials from the patient’s perspective: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2021
Non-specific effects of acupuncture and sham acupuncture in clinical trials from the patient’s perspective: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
Previous clinical trials have demonstrated that both acupuncture and sham acupuncture exert significant, non-specific effects on treatment outcomes when compared to no-treatment controls. A recently developed framework (mechanisms in orthodox and complementary and alternative medicine—MOCAM) suggests that the non-specific effects of acupuncture originate from multiple domains (e.g. patient characteristics, acupuncturist skill/technique, the patient–acupuncturist relationship, and the acupuncture environment). However, it remains to be determined precisely how these domains influence the non-specific effects of treatment among patients receiving acupuncture and sham acupuncture in clinical trials. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to synthesize existing qualitative evidence on how trial participants randomized to acupuncture and sham acupuncture groups experience non-specific effects, regardless of the types of medical condition investigated.
Methods
This systematic review included primary qualitative studies embedded in randomized controlled trials designed to investigate acupuncture or sham acupuncture interventions. Eligible studies published in English were derived from a search of five international databases. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool. Using a framework synthesis approach, the identified MOCAM framework was adapted based on the synthesis of the available qualitative evidence.
Results
A total of 20 studies of high methodological quality were included. Our proposed model indicated that the effects of acupuncture may be increased by maintaining a professional status, applying a holistic treatment approach, practicing empathy, and providing patients with an appropriate explanation of the theory behind acupuncture and sham acupuncture. From the patient’s perspective, the efficacy of treatment can be increased by following the lifestyle modification advice provided by acupuncturists, maintaining a positive attitude toward treatment efficacy, actively engaging with acupuncturists during consultation, and making behavioral changes based on experience gained during the trial.
Conclusion
The results of this study may provide a basis for improving and standardizing key components of non-specific effects in acupuncture treatment, and for improving the isolation of specific effects in future clinical trials involving acupuncture and sham acupuncture.
GrünbaumA.Explication and implications of the placebo concept. In: Andersson G (ed.) Rationality in science and politics.
Dordrecht:
Springer, 1984, pp. 131–158.
2.
PatersonCDieppeP.Characteristic and incidental (placebo) effects in complex interventions such as acupuncture.BMJ2005;
330(7501): 1202–1205.
3.
BradburyKAl-AbbadeyMCarnesD, et al.
Non-specific mechanisms in orthodox and CAM management of low back pain (MOCAM): theoretical framework and protocol for a prospective cohort study.BMJ Open2016;
6(5): e012209.
4.
ZhuDGaoYChangJ, et al.
Placebo acupuncture devices: considerations for acupuncture research.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2013;
2013: 628907.
5.
ZhangCSTanHYZhangGS, et al.
Placebo devices as effective control methods in acupuncture clinical trials: a systematic review.PLoS ONE2015;
10(11): e0140825.
6.
CherkinDCShermanKJAvinsAL, et al.
A randomized trial comparing acupuncture, simulated acupuncture, and usual care for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med2009;
169(9): 858–866.
7.
HaakeMMullerHHSchade-BrittingerC, et al.
German Acupuncture Trials (GERAC) for chronic low back pain: randomized, multicenter, blinded, parallel-group trial with 3 groups. Arch Intern Med2007;
167(17): 1892–1898.
8.
ScharfHPMansmannUStreitbergerK, et al.
Acupuncture and knee osteoarthritis: a three-armed randomized trial.Ann Intern Med2006;
145(1): 12–20.
9.
KaptchukTJKelleyJMConboyLA, et al.
Components of placebo effect: randomised controlled trial in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. BMJ2008;
336(7651): 999–1003.
10.
FosterNEThomasEBarlasP, et al.
Acupuncture as an adjunct to exercise based physiotherapy for osteoarthritis of the knee: randomised controlled trial.BMJ2007;
335(7617): 436.
11.
TongAFlemmingKMcInnesE, et al.
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ.BMC Med Res Methodol2012;
12: 181.
12.
NoyesJLewinS.Chapter 5: extracting qualitative evidence. In: NoyesJBoothAHannesK, et al. (eds) Supplementary guidance for inclusion of qualitative research in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions (Version 1).
London:
Cochrane, 2011, pp. 1–24.
13.
BoothA.Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review.Syst Rev2016;
5: 74.
14.
WongSSWilczynskiNLHaynesRB.Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically relevant qualitative studies in MEDLINE. Stud Health Technol Inform2004;
107(Pt 1): 311–316.
15.
HaynesRBKastnerMWilczynskiNL.Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound and relevant causation studies in EMBASE.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2005;
5: 8.
BoothA.“Brimful of STARLITE”: toward standards for reporting literature searches. J Med Libr Assoc2006;
94(4): 421–429, e205.
18.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.PLoS Med2009;
6(7): e1000097.
19.
ThomasJHardenA.Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.BMC Med Res Methodol2008;
8: 45.
Dixon-WoodsM.Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies.BMC Med2011;
9: 39.
22.
AlraekTMalterudK.Acupuncture for menopausal hot flashes: a qualitative study about patient experiences.J Altern Complement Med2009;
15(2): 153–158.
23.
ArmourMDahlenHGSmithCA.More than needles: the importance of explanations and self-care advice in treating primary dysmenorrhea with acupuncture. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2016;
2016: 3467067.
24.
ArvidsdotterTMarklundBTaftC, et al.
Quality of life, sense of coherence and experiences with three different treatments in patients with psychological distress in primary care: a mixed-methods study.BMC Complement Altern Med2015;
15: 132.
25.
BarlowFScottCCoghlanB, et al.
How the psychosocial context of clinical trials differs from usual care: a qualitative study of acupuncture patients.BMC Med Res Methodol2011;
11: 79.
26.
BarrKSmithCAde LaceySL.Participation in a randomised controlled trial of acupuncture as an adjunct to in vitro fertilisation: the views of study patients and acupuncturists. Eur J Integr Med2016;
8(1): 48–54.
27.
BishopFLJacobsonEEShawJR, et al.
Scientific tools, fake treatments, or triggers for psychological healing: how clinical trial participants conceptualise placebos.Soc Sci Med2012;
74(5): 767–774.
28.
ConboyLQuiltyMTKerrC, et al.
A qualitative analysis of adolescents’ experiences of active and sham Japanese-style acupuncture protocols administered in a clinical trial.J Altern Complement Med2008;
14(6): 699–705.
29.
HervikJBMjalandO.Quality of life of breast cancer patients medicated with anti-estrogens, 2 years after acupuncture treatment: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer2011;
1: S102.
30.
HoptonAEldredJMacPhersonH.Patients’ experiences of acupuncture and counselling for depression and comorbid pain: a qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open2014;
4(6): e005144.
31.
HoptonAThomasKMacPhersonH.The acceptability of acupuncture for low back pain: a qualitative study of patient’s experiences nested within a randomised controlled trial.PLoS ONE2013;
8(2): e56806.
32.
HuangWHowieJRobinsonN.Focus groups used to explore patients’ experience in a randomised controlled trial of traditional Chinese acupuncture for chronic stress. Eur J Integr Med2012;
4(1): e19–e26.
33.
KaptchukTJShawJKerrCE, et al.
‘Maybe I made up the whole thing’: placebos and patients’ experiences in a randomized controlled trial. Cult Med Psychiat2009;
33(3): 382–411.
34.
KerrCEShawJRConboyLA, et al.
Placebo acupuncture as a form of ritual touch healing: a neurophenomenological model.Conscious Cogn2011;
20(3): 784–791.
35.
MackerethPBardyJFilshieJ, et al.
Receiving or not receiving acupuncture in a trial: the experience of participants recovering from breast cancer treatment. Complement Ther Clin2014;
20(4): 291–296.
36.
PatersonCZhengZXueC, et al. ‘
Playing their parts’: the experiences of participants in a randomized sham-controlled acupuncture trial. J Altern Complement Med2008;
14(2): 199–208.
37.
RuggSPatersonCBrittenN, et al.
Traditional acupuncture for people with medically unexplained symptoms: a longitudinal qualitative study of patients’ experiences.Br J Gen Pract2011;
61(587): e306–e315.
38.
ScottCWalkerJWhiteP, et al.
Forging convictions: the effects of active participation in a clinical trial.Soc Sci Med2011;
72(12): 2041–2048.
39.
SmithCCarmadyBThorntonC, et al.
The effect of acupuncture on post-cancer fatigue and well-being for women recovering from breast cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial.Acupunct Med2013;
31(1): 9–15.
40.
SmithCFogartySTouyzS, et al.
Acupuncture and acupressure and massage health outcomes for patients with anorexia nervosa: findings from a pilot randomized controlled trial and patient interviews.J Altern Complement Med2014;
20(2): 103–112.
41.
WhitePBishopFLPrescottP, et al.
Practice, practitioner, or placebo? A multifactorial, mixed-methods randomized controlled trial of acupuncture.Pain2012;
153(2): 455–462.
42.
AjzenI.The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec1991;
50(2): 179–211.
43.
WilsonADChildsS.Effects of interventions aimed at changing the length of primary care physicians’ consultation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2006;
1: CD003540.
44.
PriceDDFinnissDGBenedettiF.A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought.Annu Rev Psychol2008;
59: 565–590.
45.
ChungSKPriceDDVerneGN, et al.
Revelation of a personal placebo response: its effects on mood, attitudes and future placebo responding.Pain2007;
132(3): 281–288.
46.
ShermanKJ.The benefits of acupuncture: what you think is what you get, or is it?Acupunct Med2014;
32: 2–3.
47.
FosterNEThomasEHillJC, et al.
The relationship between patient and practitioner expectations and preferences and clinical outcomes in a trial of exercise and acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis.Eur J Pain2010;
14(4): 402–409.
48.
ColagiuriBSmithCA.A systematic review of the effect of expectancy on treatment responses to acupuncture.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med2012;
2012: 857804.
49.
PeerdemanKJvan LaarhovenAIKeijSM, et al.
Relieving patients’ pain with expectation interventions: a meta-analysis.Pain2016;
157(6): 1179–1191.
50.
FinnissDGKaptchukTJMillerF, et al.
Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects. Lancet2010;
375(9715): 686–695.
51.
SchedlowskiMEnckPRiefW, et al.
Neuro-bio-behavioral mechanisms of placebo and nocebo responses: implications for clinical trials and clinical practice.Pharmacol Rev2015;
67(3): 697–730.
52.
ElsenbruchSEnckP.Placebo effects and their determinants in gastrointestinal disorders.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol2015;
12(8): 472–485.
53.
PatersonCBrittenN.Acupuncture as a complex intervention: a holistic model.J Altern Complement Med2004;
10(5): 791–801.
54.
HughesJGGoldbartJFairhurstE, et al.
Exploring acupuncturists’ perceptions of treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Complement Ther Med2007;
15(2): 101–108.
55.
ChungVCHoRSWuX, et al.
Incorporating traditional Chinese medicine syndrome differentiation in randomized trials: methodological issues. Eur J Integr Med2016;
8(6): 898–904.
56.
RehmanSUNietertPJCopeDW, et al.
What to wear today? Effect of doctor’s attire on the trust and confidence of patients. Am J Med2005;
118(11): 1279–1286.
57.
TurnerRNLeachJRobinsonD.First impressions in complementary practice: the importance of environment, dress and address to the therapeutic relationship.Complement Ther Clin Pract2007;
13(2): 102–109.
58.
HallMADuganEZhengB, et al.
Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter?Milbank Q2001;
79(4): 613–639.
59.
WangS-MKainZNWhiteP.Acupuncture analgesia: I. The scientific basis. Anesth Analg2008;
106(2): 602–610.
60.
MercerSWReynoldsWJ.Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract2002;
52(Suppl.): S9–S12.
61.
MercerSWMcConnachieAMaxwellM, et al.
Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure in general practice.Fam Pract2005;
22(3): 328–334.
62.
Di BlasiZCrawfordFBradleyC, et al.
Reactions to treatment debriefing among the participants of a placebo controlled trial.BMC Health Serv Res2005;
5(1): 30.
63.
FasslerMGnadingerMRosemannT, et al.
Use of placebo interventions among Swiss primary care providers. BMC Health Serv Res2009;
9: 144.
64.
LoudonKTreweekSSullivanF, et al.
The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose.BMJ2015;
350: h2147.
65.
ArmitageP.The role of randomization in clinical trials.Stat Med1982;
1(4): 345–352.
66.
MoermanDEJonasWB.Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response.Ann Intern Med2002;
136(6): 471–476.
67.
HowickJFriedemannCTsakokM, et al.
Are treatments more effective than placebos? A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS ONE2013;
8(5): e62599.
68.
LuoJXuHLiuB.Real world research: a complementary method to establish the effectiveness of acupuncture.BMC Complement Altern Med2015;
15: 153.
69.
LundebergTLundINaslundJ, et al.
The Emperors sham–wrong assumption that sham needling is sham.Acupunct Med2008;
26(4): 239–242.
70.
WeimerKEnckP.Traditional and innovative experimental and clinical trial designs and their advantages and pitfalls. Handb Exp Pharmacol2014;
225: 237–272.
71.
HróbjartssonAGøtzschePC.Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2010;
1: CD003974.
72.
ChaeYLeeY-SEnckP.How placebo needles differ from placebo pills?Front Psychiatry2018;
9.
LacknerJMJaccardJKrasnerSS, et al.
How does cognitive behavior therapy for irritable bowel syndrome work? A mediational analysis of a randomized clinical trial.Gastroenterology2007;
133(2): 433–444.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
