Lessons from retracted publications on acupuncture: a narrative scoping review

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

COPE_Council. COPE Guidelines: Retraction Guidelines, 2019, https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction-guidelines.pdf

Wager

Williams

Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of MEDLINE retractions 1988–2008. J Med Ethics 2011; 37(9): 567–570.

Bastian

Glasziou

Chalmers

Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?

PLoS Med 2010; 7: e1000326.

Kochan

Budd

JM.

The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1992; 43(7): 488–493.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.34 MB