A clinical audit in a UK-based acupuncture private practice: assessing patient demographics,outcomes and experience

Abstract

Objectives:

The aim of this clinical audit was to assess patient demographics, outcomes and experience with care in patients who received acupuncture in a private practice setting in the United Kingdom.

Methods:

Demographic and clinical data were extracted from patients’ records over a 7-year period. The Measure Yourself Medical Outcomes Profile (MYMOP) questionnaire and an adapted Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale were used routinely to monitor patient outcomes over an 18-month period. Finally, a retrospective questionnaire was used to assess patient beliefs regarding treatment effectiveness, adverse events and overall experience with care. Patients not providing consent or known to be deceased were excluded.

Results:

Data were collected for 306 patients presenting with 376 separate health complaints, 58% of which were musculoskeletal. Follow-up outcomes (MYMOP scores (n = 51) and PGIC scale responses (n = 50)) showed a clinically significant improvement compared to baseline for the majority of health complaints (93% of PGIC scores were ‘improved’ and 79% MYMOP demonstrated > 1 point change). Total mean MYMOP severity scores were reduced by almost 50% (p < 0.001) after 1–4 weeks, and this was sustained in the medium-to-long term. There was a strong negative correlation (r = −0.767, p < 0.001) between the MYMOP and PGIC scores. A total of 118 health complaints were reported by 85/255 patients who responded to a retrospective questionnaire. Over 84% of patients believed that the treatments they received were ‘effective’ at addressing their health complaints. Seven minor adverse events were reported and four patients experienced negative treatment outcomes.

Conclusions:

Although musculoskeletal conditions were the most common, this audit found that patients sought treatment for a wide range of predominantly chronic health complaints, for many of which there is a currently a lack of quality evidence to support the use of acupuncture. Overall, the small sample of patients who responded to outcome questionnaires reported clinically meaningful and sustained improvements.

Keywords

acupuncture clinical audit patient-reported outcomes pragmatic

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ivers

Jamtvedt

Flottorp

, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (6): CD000259.

National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Principles for best practice in clinical audit. Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2002.

White

Conducting and reporting case series and audits: author guidelines for acupuncture in medicine. Acupunct Med 2005; 23(4): 181–187.

Fixler

Ogden

Moir

, et al. Patient experience of acupuncture provision in a GP practice. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2012; 18(3): 140–144.

Stellon

An audit of acupuncture in a single-handed general practice over one year. Acupunct Med 2001; 19(1): 36–42.

Day

Kingsbury-Smith

An audit of acupuncture in general practice. Acupunct Med J Br Med Acupunct Soc 2004; 22: 87–92.

Freedman

An audit of 500 acupuncture patients in general practice. Acupunct Med 2002; 20(1): 30–34.

Harborow

Ogden

The effectiveness of an acupuncturist working in general practice: an audit. Acupunct Med 2004; 22(4): 214–220.

Gould

MacPherson

Patient perspectives on outcomes after treatment with acupuncture. J Altern Complement Med 2001; 7(3): 261–268.

10.

Staebler

Survey and audit to evaluate our work: finding a model which describes the way we work. Eur J Orient Med 2015; 8: 35–40.

11.

Melchart

Linde

Liao

, et al. Systematic clinical auditing in complementary medicine: rationale, concept, and a pilot study. Altern Ther Health Med 1997; 3(1): 33–39.

12.

Paterson

Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey. Br Med J 1996; 312: 1016–1020.

13.

Grabowska

Squire

MacRae

, et al. Provision of acupuncture in a university health centre: a clinical audit. Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery 2003; 9(1): 14–19.

14.

Joseph

A survey of acupuncture treatments in general practice. Acupunct Med 2002; 20(2–3): 100–101.

15.

Robinson

TW.

Western acupuncture in a NHS general practice: anonymized 3-year patient feedback survey. J Altern Complement Med N Y N 2012; 18: 555–560.

16.

WHO International Classification Committee of WONCA. IICPC-2-R international classification of primary care. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO, 2014.

17.

Guy

(ed.). ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Kensington, MD: The George Washington University, 1976.

18.

Kamper

Maher

Mackay

Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther 2009; 17(3): 163–170.

19.

Field

Newell

Clinical outcomes in a large cohort of musculoskeletal patients undergoing chiropractic care in the United Kingdom: a comparison of self- and national health service-referred routes. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2016; 39(1): 54–62.

20.

Newell

Bolton

Responsiveness of the Bournemouth questionnaire in determining minimal clinically important change in subgroups of low back pain patients. Spine 2010; 35(19): 1801–1806.

21.

Hughes

. Clinical audit: a manual for lay members of the clinical audit team. Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership, 2021.

22.

Dixon

. Guide to managing ethical issues in quality improvement or clinical audit projects, https://www.hqip.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/guide-to-managing-ethical-issues-in-quality-improvement-or-clinical-audit-projects.pdf

23.

British Medical Association (BMA). Medical ethics today: the BMA’s handbook of ethics and law. 3rd ed. London: BMJ Books, 2012.

24.

Paterson

Britten

In pursuit of patient-centred outcomes: a qualitative evaluation of the ’measure yourself medical outcome profile. J Health Serv Res Policy 2000; 5: 27–36.

25.

Kingsley

Patel

Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Educ 2017; 17: 137–144.

26.

Mazor

Clauser

Field

, et al. A demonstration of the impact of response bias on the results of patient satisfaction surveys. Health Serv Res 2002; 37(5): 1403–1417.

27.

Chang

Gillespie

Shaverdian

Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients’ responses and impact on data quality. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2019; 10: 171–186.

28.

Brough

The warwick holistic health questionnaire. The development and validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for craniosacral therapy: a mixed methods study. Warwick: Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, 2017.

29.

Ishaque

Johnson

Vohra

Individualized health-related quality of life instrument measure yourself medical outcome profile (MYMOP) and its adaptations: a critical appraisal. Qual Life Res 2018; 28(4): 879–893.

30.

Perrot

Lantéri-Minet

Patients’ global impression of change in the management of peripheral neuropathic pain: clinical relevance and correlations in daily practice. Eur J Pain Lond Engl 2019; 23: 1117–1128.

31.

National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Evidence review for acupuncture for chronic primary pain: NICE guideline NG193. London: NICE, 2020.

32.

Kam

Eslick

Campbell

An audit of the effectiveness of acupuncture on musculoskeletal pain in primary health care. Acupunct Med 2002; 20(1): 35–38.

33.

Hopton

Curnoe

Kanaan

, et al. Acupuncture in practice: mapping the providers, the patients and the settings in a national cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2012; 2(1): e000456.

34.

MacPherson

Thomas

Walters

, et al. The York acupuncture safety study: prospective survey of 34 000 treatments by traditional acupuncturists. BMJ 2001; 323: 486–487.

35.

Espallargues

Valderas

Alonso

Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. Med Care 2000; 38(2): 175–186.

36.

Holmes

Lewith

Newell

, et al. The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2017; 26(2): 245–257.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

0.03 MB

0.60 MB

0.30 MB

0.51 MB