Although considerable research has been conducted into the dynamics of commons in rural settings, we still know very little about common property within cities. Given the hegemony of certain models of property, the urban commons has been overlooked and ignored. Urban commons do not look like property to us. This can lead, I argue, to real injustice. Based, in part, on empirical research in Vancouver, I attempt to map out the urban commons of the poor, particularly in relation to the dynamics of inner-city gentrification. This commons, produced through intensive patterns of use and collective habitation, is fiercely moral, reliant upon political claims and the exclusion of interests that threaten enclosure. For inner-city activists contesting displacement, the commons is real. As such, gentrification, and related dynamics, can usefully be thought of as forms of enclosure, or what David Harvey terms `dispossession by accumulation'. I conclude by asking what urban policy, political praxis and property theory might look like if they acknowledged the collective property interest of the poor in the inner-city commons.
Angelis, M.D. (2003) `Reflections on Alternatives, Commons and Communities, or Building a New World from the Bottom up', The Commoner6: 1-14.
2.
Angus, I. (2001) `Subsistence as a Social Right: A Political Ideal for Socialism?', Studies in Political Economy65: 117-35.
3.
Bethell, T. (1998) The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity through the Ages. New York: St. Martin's Press.
4.
Blakely, P., and M. Snyder (1997) Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
5.
Blomley, N. (1998) `Landscapes of Property', Law and Society Review32(3): 567-612.
6.
Blomley, N. (2002) `Mud for the Land', Public Culture14(3): 557-82.
7.
Blomley, N. (2004a) `Un-real Estate: Proprietary Space and Public Gardening', Antipode36(4): 614-41.
8.
Blomley, N. (2004b) Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York: Routledge .
9.
Blomley, N. (2005) `Remember Property?', Progress in Human Geography29(2): 125-7.
10.
Booth, P. (2002) `From Property Rights to Public Control: The Quest for Public Interest in the Control of Urban Development', Town Planning Review73(2): 153-70.
11.
Boyle, J. (2003) `The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain', Law and Contemporary Problems, 66: 33-74.
12.
Bromley, D.W. (1991) Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
Bromley, D.W. (1992) `The Commons, Property, and Common-Property Regimes' , pp. 1-15 in D. W. Bromley (ed.) Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, and Policy. San Francisco : Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
14.
Collins, J. (1997) `Given the Bum's Rush by Bureaucrats', British Columbia Report8(4): 16.
15.
Cuff, D. (1998) `Community Property: Enter the Architect or, The Politics of Form', pp. 120-40 in M. Bell and S. T. Leong (eds) Slow Space . New York: Monacelli Press.
16.
Davis, J.E. (2000) `Homemaking: The Pragmatic Politics of Third Sector Housing', pp. 233-58 in C. Geisler and G. Daneker (eds) Property and Values: Alternatives to Public and Private Ownership. Washington, DC: Island Press.
17.
DeFilippis, J. (2004) Unmaking Goliath: Community Control in the Face of Global Capital. London and New York: Routledge.
18.
Donahue, B. (1999) Reclaiming the Commons: Community Farms and Forests in a New England Town. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
Elshtain, J.B. (1999) `Public and Private in American Political Life and Thought', pp. 23-34 in Hitoshi Abe, Hiroko Sato and Chieko Kitagawa Otsuru (eds) The Public and the Private in the United States . Osaka: The Japan Center for Area Studies.
20.
Feeny, D., F. Berkes, B.J. McCay and J.M. Acheson (1990) `The Tragedy of the Commons: Twenty Two Years Later' , Human Ecology18(1): 1-19.
21.
Geisler, C. (2000) `Property Pluralism', in C. Geisler and G. Daneker (eds) Property and Values: Alternatives to Public and Private Ownership. Washington DC: Island Press.
22.
Gibson-Graham, J.K. (1996) The End of Capitalism (as We Know It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2005) Surplus Possibilities: Postdevelopment and Community Economies', Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography26(1): 4-26.
24.
Grdadolnik, H. (2006) `Woodward's Takes Shape: Nothing Like It in North America', The Tyee, 30 March.
25.
Groc, I. (1997) `Stopping Halfway in Commons Preservation: The Case of Traverse City, Michigan', URL (accessed 16 May 2005): http://www.3.bc.sympatico.ca/idoumenc/CommonPropertyPaper.html .
26.
Hardt, M. and A. Negri (2004) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire . New York: Penguin Press.
27.
Harris, J.W. (1995) `Private and Non-Private Property: What Is the Difference?', Law Quarterly Review111: 421-44.
28.
Harvey, D. (2003) The New Imperialism. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
29.
Hesse, P. (2001) Common Interest Developments in Canada: Private Communities and the Future of Canadian Cities. Winnipeg : Institute of Urban Studies.
30.
Ingerson, A. (1997) `Urban Land as Common Property', Land Lines8(1).
31.
Johnson, C. (2004) `Uncommon Ground: The "Poverty of History" in Common Property Discourse', Development and Change35(3): 407-33.
32.
Klein, N. (2001) `Reclaiming the Commons', New Left Review9(May/June): 81-9.
33.
Kohn, M. (2004) Brave New Neighborhoods: The Privatization of Public Space. New York: Routledge.
34.
Krueckeberg, D.A. (1995) `The Difficult Character of Property: To Whom Do Things Belong', Journal of the American Planning Association61(3): 301-9.
35.
Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Toward a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso .
36.
Lehavi, A. (2004) `Property Rights and Local Public Goods: Toward a Better Future for Urban Communities', Urban Lawyer36(1): 1-98.
37.
Lynd, S. (1987) `The Genesis of the Idea of a Community Right to Industrial Property in Youngstown and Pittsburgh, 1977-1987', Journal of American History74(3): 926-58.
38.
McCann, A. (2004) `Understanding Enclosure without and within the Commons', URL (accessed 17 May 2005): http://www.beyondthecommons.com .
39.
McCarthy, J. (2005) `Commons as Counterhegemonic Projects', Capitalism, Nature, Socialism16(1): 9-24.
40.
McCay, B.J. and S. Jentoft (1998) `Market or Community Failure? Critical Perspectives on Common Property Research', Human Organization57(1): 21-9.
41.
McGinnis, K. (2001) `Great Commons of the World', Yes! Magazine, Summer.
42.
Macpherson, C.B. (1978) `The Meaning of Property', pp. 1-14 in C. B. Macpherson (ed.) Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
43.
Mann, G. (2002) `Class Consciousness and Common Property: The International Fishermen and Allied Workers of America', International Labor and Working Class History61: 141-60.
44.
Maquire, J.C. (1988) `Fashioning an Equitable Vision for Public Resource Protection in Canada: The Public Trust Doctrine Revisited and Reconceptualized' , Journal of Environmental Law and Practice7: 1-42.
45.
Marcellus, O.D. (2003) `Commons, Communities and Movements: Inside, outside and against Capital', The Commoner6: 1-15.
46.
Medoff, P. and H. Sklar (1994) Streets of Hope: The Fall and Rise of an Urban Neighborhood. Boston: South End Press.
47.
Midnight Notes Collective (1990) `Introduction to the New Enclosures', pp. 1-9 in The New Enclosures , Midnight Notes 10.
48.
Morgan, B.N. (1998) `The Language of the Commons in Low Income Housing Communities', International Association for the Study of Common Property Conference, Vancouver.
49.
Nedelsky, J. (1990) Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Neeson, J.W. (1993) Commoners: Common Right, Enclosure, and Social Change in England, 1700-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Nelson, R.H. (2000) `Collective Private Ownership of American Housing: A Social Revolution in Local Governance', Working Paper No. 9/2000. Turin, Italy: International Center for Economic Research , July.
52.
Neuwirth, R. (2005) Shadow Cities: A Billion Squatters, a New Urban World. Routledge: New York.
53.
Oakerson, R.J. (1992) `Analyzing the Commons: A Framework', pp. 41-59 in D. W. Bromley (ed.) Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, and Policy. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
54.
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Ostrom, E., J. Burger, C.B. Field, R.B. Norgaard and D. Policansky (1999) `Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, Global Challenges', Science284: 278-82. Ostrom, E., T. Dietz, N. Dolšak et al. (2002 ) The Drama of the Commons. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
56.
p.m. ( 1990) `Current Land Struggles in Zurich or Ideas to Transform a Neighborhood', pp. 77-83 in The New Enclosures, Midnight Notes 10.
57.
Parker, G. (2002) Citizenships, Contingency and the Countryside: Rights, Culture, Land and the Environment. London: Routledge.
58.
Peluso, N. (2003) `From Common Property Resources to Territorializations: Resource Management in the Twenty First Century', Keynote Speech, IASCP Regional Meetings, Chiang Mai, Thailand, July.
59.
Peluso, N. (2005) `Seeing Property in Land Use: Local Territorializations in West Kalimantan, Indonesia', Geografisk Tidsskrift105(1): 1-15.
60.
Radin, M. (1986) `Residential Rent Control', Philosophy and Public Affairs15(4): 350-80.
61.
Razzaz, O.M. (1993) `Examining Property Rights and Investment in Informal Settlements: The Case of Jordan', Land Economics69(4): 341-55.
62.
Roisin, T. (1998) `The Street as Public Commons: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Framework for Studying Waste and Traffic in India', International Association for the Study of Common Property Conference , Vancouver.
63.
Rose, C. (1994) Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership. Boulder, CO: Westview.
64.
Rose, C. (1998) `The Several Futures of Property: Of Cyberspace and Folk Tales, Emission Trades and Ecosystems', Minnesota Law Review83: 129-82.
65.
Rowe, J. (2001) `The Hidden Commons', Yes! Magazine, Summer.
66.
Santos, B. d. S. (2004) `The WSF: Toward a Counter-Hegemonic Globalisation' , pp. 235-45 in J. Sen, A. Anand, A. Escobar and P. Waterman (eds) World Social Forum: Challenging New Empires. New Delhi: The Viveka Foundation.
67.
Sax, J.L. (1970) `The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention', Michigan Law Review68: 471-566.
68.
Selznick, P. (2003) `Law and Society Revisited', Journal of Law and Society30(2): 177-86.
69.
Singer, J. (1988) `The Reliance Interest in Property', Stanford Law Review40(3): 611-751.
70.
Singer, J. (1996) `No Right to Exclude: Public and Private Accommodations and Private Property', Northwestern University Law Review90(4): 1283-497.
71.
Singer, J. (2000) Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
72.
Smith, N. (2002) `New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy', Antipode34(4): 452-72.
73.
Smith, N. and J. Derksen (2002) `Urban Regeneration: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy', pp. 62-95 in R. Shier (ed.) Stan Douglas: Every Building on 100 West Hastings Street. Vancouver: Contemporary Art Gallery/ Arsenal Pulp Press.
74.
Steinberg, T. (1995) Slide Mountain, or the Folly of Owning Nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.
75.
Sturgeon, J. (2005) Border Landscapes: The Politics of Akha Land Use in China and Thailand. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
76.
Vogt, R. (1999) Whose Property? The Deepening Conflict between Private Property and Democracy in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
77.
Waldron, J. (1988) The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Clarendon.
78.
Watts, M.J. (2004) `Enclosure: A Modern Spatiality of Nature', pp. 48-64 in P. Cloke, P. Crang and M. Goodwin (eds) Envisioning Human Geographies. London: Arnold.
79.
Weintraub, J. (1997) `The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction', pp. 1-42 in W. J. and K. Kumar (eds) Public and Private in Thought and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
