Unwanted Entanglement: The Philippines’ Spratly Policy as a Case Study in Conflict Enhancement?

Abstract

The Philippines used a number of incidents involving China around Mischief Reef between February and May 1995 as a lever to stimulate their political and military relationship with the USA following the closure of the US bases in the Philippines in 1992. However, the success enjoyed by the Philippines was not due to the underlying logic of US–Philippines relations narrowly defined. Rather, the main factor was China’s resort to military pressure against Taiwan in July and August 1995, and again in March 1996. For the first time, the USA used its ally’s presence in the disputed Spratly islands as a lever of its own for winning back Philippine support for renewed US military access as part of the USA’s strategy for regional power projection against China. The Philippines had played for a security guarantee from the USA in respect of the Spratly islands, but found the price of alliance was mutual commitment, especially with regard to a possible Taiwan contingency.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AFP, 1996. ‘Philippines Official: PRC Missile Misfire Could Hit Philippines’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-96-047, 11 March).

AFP, 1997. ‘Philippines: Military To Propose Contingency Plan with US in Case of War’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-97-143, 23 May).

AFP, 1999a. ‘Philippines: Manila Welcomes US Comment on PRC Role in Spratlys’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-99-006, 6 January).

AFP, 1999b. ‘Philippines: Estrada: Manila May Invoke US Defence Pact over Spratlys’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-99-011, 11 January).

AFP, 1999c. ‘Philippines: Siazon Cautions against US Involvement over Spratlys’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-99-013, 13 January).

AFP, 1999d. ‘Philippines Rejects Arms Deal with US without VFA’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-99-017, 17 January).

AFP, 2002. ‘Vice President Concerned US Pact Could Draw Philippines into Iraq Conflict’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-2002-1122, 25 November).

Arkin, William M., 2002. ‘Secret Plan Outlines the Unthinkable’ , Los Angeles Times, 10 March.

Austin, Greg, 1997. ‘The Taiwan Issue in Japanese Domestic Politics’, in Greg Austin, ed., Missile Diplomacy and Taiwan’s Future: Innovations in Politics and Military Power. Canberra: Strategic and Defence Studies Centre .

10.

Austin, Greg, 1998.China’s Ocean Frontier: International Law, Military Force and National Development. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin .

11.

Bandow, Doug, 2001. ‘Instability in the Philippines: A Case Study in Disengagement’, Cato Institute Foreign Policy Briefing No. 64. Washington, DC: Cato Institute .

12.

Bongioanni, Carlos & Kendra Helmer, 2001. ‘Training Gives U.S. Troops a Presence in Philippines Without Putting down Roots’ , Stars and Stripes 27 May; available at http://ww2.pstripes.osd.mil/01/may01/ed052701n.html (27 November 2002).

13.

Cohen, William S., 1997. ‘Remarks as Prepared for Delivery by Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen to the Brookings Institution Board of Trustees, Washington DC, 12 May; available at http://usinfo.state.gov/regional/ea/easec/cohensec.htm (12 November 2002).

14.

De Castro, Renato Cruz, 1999. ‘Adjusting to the Post-U.S. Bases Era: The Ordeal of the Philippine Military’s Modernization Program’ , Armed Forces & Society 26(1): 119–138 .

15.

Fisher, Richard D., 1999.‘Rebuilding the US–Philippine Alliance’, Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 1255. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation ; available at http://new.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/BG1255.cfm (27 November 2002).

16.

Gertz, Bill, 2002. ‘White House Backs Strong Defence of Taiwan’ , Washington Times, 11 April.

17.

Guran, Elizabeth, 1989. ‘Challenge in the Pacific: U.S. Basing Beyond the 1990s’ , Armed Forces Journal International 127(4): 56–60 .

18.

Kan, Shirley A., 2001. ‘China/Taiwan: Evolution of the “One China” Policy–Key Statements from Washington, Beijing, and Taipei’, Congressional Research Service Report RL30341, updated 12 March; available at http://www.fas.org/man/crs/RL30341.pdf.

19.

Khalilzad, Zalmay; David T. Orletsky, Jonathan D. Pollack, Kevin Pollpeter, Angel M. Rabasa, David A. Shlapak, Abram N. Shulsky & Ashley J. Tellis, 2001.The United States and Asia: Toward a New US Strategy and Force Posture. Santa Monica, CA: RAND .

20.

McDevitt, Michael, 1999. ‘China and the South China Sea: A Conference Summary Report’, Pac Net Newsletter no. 15; available at http://www.csis.org/pacfor/pac1599.html (27 November 2002).

21.

McKearney, T. J., 1989. ‘Philippine Bases: Going, Going, Gone?’ , Proceedings 115(3): 21-21 .

22.

Manila Business World, 1996. ‘Philippines General Denies War Games Linked to PRC–Taiwan Issue’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-96-055, 21 March).

23.

Manila Business World, 1997. ‘Philippines: Air Force Favors Letting US Military Use Facilities’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-97-167, 19 June).

24.

Manila Business World, 1998a. ‘Philippines: Siazon: US To Aid Manila in Event of Spratlys Attack’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-98-218, 9 August).

25.

Manila Business World, 1998b. ‘Philippines: Manila Accuses PRC of Creeping Invasion’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-98-314, 13 November).

26.

Manila Business World, 1999. ‘Philippines: Further on US Role in Resolving Tension in Spratlys’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-99-013, 13 January).

27.

Manila Times, 1988. ‘Message Sent to Philippines on Spratlys’ (as reproduced in FBIS–CHI–88–055, 22 March).

28.

Philippine Daily Inquirer, 2001. ‘Official: PRC, Taiwan Tension Can Create Dangerous Flashpoint for Philippines’ (as reproduced in FBIS-EAS-2001-0327, 27 March).

29.

Prueher, Joseph W., 1998. ‘Statement of Admiral Joseph W. Prueher, U.S. Navy Commander in Chief, United States Pacific Command, Before the Armed Services Committee, United States House of Representatives, Posture Hearing, 4 March’; available at http://russia.shaps.hawaii.edu/security/98-3-4prueher.html (12 November 2002).

30.

Reuters, 1995a. ‘Philippines: Manila Alleges Chinese Duplicity in Spratlys’, 10 April.

31.

Reuters, 1995b. ‘China: China Turns Up Heat on Reckless Manila’, 18 May.

32.

Reuters, 1995c. ‘Philippines: Elephant-vs-Ant Confrontation in Spratlys’, 16 June.

33.

Ricciardone, Francis, 2002. ‘Foreign Correspondents Association of the Philippines (FOCAP) Press Meeting with Ambassador Francis Ricciardone’, 15 July, Manila; available at http://usembassy.state.gov/posts/rp1/wwwhfoc1.html (4 November 2002).

34.

Samuels, Marwyn S., 1982.Contest for the South China Sea. New York: Methuen .

35.

Schirmer, Daniel B., 1995. ‘U.S. Bases by Another Name: ACSA in the Philippines’. Brooklyn, NY/Durham, NC: Philippine Bases Network/Friends of the Filipino People; available at http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/54a/004.html (27 November 2002).

36.

Steinberg, David J., 1994.The Philippines: A Singular and a Plural Place, 3rd edn. Boulder, CO.: Westview .

37.

Sutter, Robert, 1995. ‘Southeast Asian Security: Issues for the US’, Congressional Research Service Report 95-927S, 24 August; available at http://www.fas.org/man/crs/95-927s.htm (4 November 2002).

38.

Tenet, George, 2002. ‘Worldwide Threat: Converging Dangers in a Post 9/11 World–Testimony of Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet Before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’ (as prepared for delivery), 6 February; available at http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/dci_speech_02062002.html.

39.

US Department of Defense, 1999. ‘DoD News Briefing, Sunday, October 3, 1999, Manila, the Philippines’; available at http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct1999/t10041999_t91003sd.html (27 November 2002).

40.

US State Department, 1995. ‘Spratlys and the South China Sea’ Statement by the Acting Spokesman, US Department of State, 10 May 1995; available at http://gsaps.hanyang.ac.kr/usa/Term/SouthChinaSeaSite2/us_statement.htm (4 November 2002).

41.

US State Department, 1996. ‘Background Notes on the Philippines’, Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, November, http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/bgnotes/eap/philippines9611.html (3 December 2002).

42.

US State Department, 2001. ‘U.S.–Philippine Relations: Opportunities To Enhance Our Enduring Partnership’, Thomas Hubbard, Acting Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs, Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Washington, DC, 6 March; available at http://www.state.gov/p/eap/rls/rm/2001/1129.htm (3 December 2002).

43.

Wolfowitz, Paul, 2002. ‘Wolfowitz Says Asian Muslims Can Be Anti-Terror Allies’, Remarks as Prepared for Delivery by US Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Asia Security Conference: The Shangri-La Dialogue, Singapore, 1 June; available at http://www.usconsulate.org.hk/uscn/others/2002/060101.htm (27 November 2002).