This article proposes the notion of a security imaginary as a heuristic tool for exploring military isomorphism (the phenomenon that weapons and military strategies begin to look the same across the world) at a time when the US model of defence transformation is being adopted by an increasing number of countries. Built on a critical constructivist foundation, the security-imaginary approach is contrasted with rationalist and neo-institutionalist ways of explaining military diffusion and emulation. Merging cultural and constructivist themes, the article offers a `strong cultural' argument to explain why a country would emulate a foreign military model and how this model is constituted in and comes to constitute a society's security imaginary.
Althusser, Louis, 1970. `Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses', in Louis Althusser, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York & London: Monthly Review Press; available at http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm (accessed 1 September 2007).
2.
Avant, Deborah, 2000. `From Mercenary to Citizen Armies: Explaining Change in the Practice of War', International Organization54(1): 41—72.
3.
Batchelor, Peter & Susan Willett , 1998. Disarmament and Defence Industrial Adjustment in South Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press/SIPRI.
4.
Bevir, Mark & Rod Rhodes , 2004. `Interpreting British Governance ', British Journal of Politics and International Relations6(2): 129—164.
5.
Booth, Ken, 1991. `Security and Emancipation', Review of International Studies17(4): 313—326.
6.
Bruner, Jerome, 1991. `The Narrative Construction of Reality', Critical Inquiry18 (Autumn): 1—21.
7.
Buffet, Cyril & Beatrice Heuser , 1998. Haunted by History: Myths in International Relations. Oxford: Berghahn.
8.
Butler, Judith, 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of `Sex'. New York: Routledge.
9.
Butler, Judith, 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.
10.
Buzan, Barry; Ole Wæver & Jaap de Wilde , 1998. Security: A New Framework . London: Lynne Rienner.
11.
Campbell, David, 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press/Manchester University Press.
12.
Castoriadis, Cornelius, 1987. The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.
13.
Checkel, Jeffrey, 1999. `Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe', International Studies Quarterly43(1): 83—114.
14.
Cock, Jaclyn & Laurie Nathan, eds, 1989. War and Society: The Militarisation of South Africa. Cape Town: David Phillip.
15.
Cox, Robert, 1981. `Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory', Millennium: Journal of International Studies10(2): 126—155.
16.
Cox, Robert, 1992. `Globalization, Multilateralism and Democracy', Academic Council on the United Nations System, Reports and Papers no 2; available at http://www.acuns.wlu.ca/publications/Cox/Cox.body.shtml (accessed 8 November 2004).
17.
Demchak, Chris, 2000. `The RMA in Developing States: Dilemmas of Image, Operation and Democracy', National Security Studies Quarterly6(4): 1—45.
18.
Demchak, Chris, 2002. `Complexity and Theory of Networked Militaries', in Theo Farrell & Terry Terriff, eds, The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology. Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner (221—264).
19.
Eden, Lynn, 2004. Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, and Nuclear Weapons Devastation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20.
Enloe, Cynthia, 1989. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. London: Pandora.
21.
Enloe, Cynthia, 1996. `Margins, Silences and Bottom Rungs: How To Overcome the Underestimation of Power in the Study of International Relations', in Steve Smith, Ken Booth & Marysia Zalewski, eds, International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (186—202).
22.
Eyre, Dana & Mark Suchman, 1996. `Status, Norms and the Proliferation of Conventional Weapons: An Institutional Theory Approach', in Peter Katzenstein, ed., The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press (79—113).
23.
Farrell, Theo, 1996. `Figuring Out Fighting Organizations: The New Organizational Analysis in Strategic Studies', Journal of Strategic Studies19(1): 122—135.
24.
Farrell, Theo, 2001. `Transnational Norms and Military Development', European Journal of International Relations7(1): 63—102.
25.
Farrell, Theo, 2002a. `Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program', International Studies Review4(1): 49—72.
26.
Farrell, Theo, 2002b. `World Culture and the Irish Army, 1922—1942', in Theo Farrell & Terry Terriff, eds, The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology. Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner (69—90).
27.
Farrell, Theo, 2005. `World Culture and Military Power', Security Studies14(3): 448—488.
28.
Feenberg, Andrew, 1995b. Alternative Modernity: The Technical Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory. London: University of California Press.
29.
Feenberg, Andrew, 1995a. `Subversive Rationalization: Technology, Power, and Democracy ', in Andrew Feenberg & Alastair Hannay, eds, Technology and the Politics of Knowledge. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press (65—84).
30.
Foucault, Michel, 1970. The Order of Things. London: Tavistock.
Geertz, Clifford, 1975. `Common Sense as a Cultural System', Antioch Review33(1): 46—53.
33.
Geertz, Clifford, 1993. Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic.
34.
Goldman, Emily, 2004. `Introduction: The Information Revolution in Military Affairs: Prospects for Asia', in Emily Goldman & Thomas Mahnken, The Information Revolution in Military Affairs in Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan (1—22).
35.
Goldman, Emily, 2006. `Cultural Foundations of Military Diffusion', Review of International Studies32(1): 69—91.
36.
Goldman, Emily & Leslie Eliason, eds, 2003. The Diffusion of Military Technology and Ideas. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
Goldman, Emily & Thomas Mahnken , 2004. The Information Revolution in Military Affairs in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
Grundy, Ken, 1988. The Militarization of South African Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Hall, Stuart, 1980. `Race, Articulation, and Societies Structured in Dominance', in UNESCO, Sociological Theories: Race and Colonialism. Paris: UNESCO (305—345).
40.
Hall, Stuart, 1997. `The Work of Representation', in Stuart Hall, ed., Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage (13—61).
41.
Hopf, Ted, 1998. `The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory', International Security23(1): 171—200.
42.
Horowitz, Michael, 2006. `The Diffusion of Military Power: Consequences for International Politics', paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, 31 August.
43.
Huxley, Tim, 2004. `Singapore and the Revolution in Military Affairs: An Outsider's Perspective', Pointer30(1); available at http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/publications/pointer/journals/2004/v30n1.html (accessed 6 January 2005).
44.
Kaldor, Mary, 1990. The Imaginary War. Oxford: Blackwell.
45.
Kubalkova, Vendulka, 1998. `The Twenty Year's Catharsis: E. H. Carr and IR', in Vendulka Kubalkova, Nicholas Onuf & Paul Kowert, eds, International Relations in a Constructed World. London: M. E. Sharp (25—57).
46.
Latham, Andrew, 2000. `Global Culture and the Transnational Campaign To Ban Anti-Personnel Landmines: A Research Agenda', York Centre for International and Security Studies Occasional Paper 62; available at http://www.yorku.ca/yciss/publications/OP62-Latham.pdf (accessed 18 November 2004).
47.
Muppidi, Himadeep, 1999. `Postcoloniality and the Production of Insecurity', in Jutta Weldes, Mark Laffey, Hugh Gusterson & Raymond Duvall, eds, Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the Production of Danger. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press (119—146).
48.
Nathan, Laurie; Peter Batchelor & Guy Lamb, 1997. `Submission to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Business Sector Hearing', Staff Paper, Centre for Conflict Resolution, University of Cape Town; available at http://ccrweb.ccr.uct.ac.za/archive/staff_papers/guy_trc.html (accessed 30 October 2007).
49.
Neocleous, Mark, 2000. The Fabrication of Social Order: A Critical Theory of Police Power. London: Pluto.
50.
Neocleous, Mark, 2006. `From Social to National Security: On the Fabrication of Economic Order', Security Dialogue37(3): 363—384.
51.
Resende-Santos, Jao, 2007. Neorealism, States, and the Modern Mass Army. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Scott, James, 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
53.
Taliaferro, Jeffrey, 2006. `State Building for Future Wars: Neo-Classical Realism and the Resource-Extractive state', Security Studies15(3): 464—495.
54.
Taylor, Charles, 2004. Modern Social Imaginaries. London: Duke University Press.
55.
Tomlinson, John, 1991. Cultural Imperialism: A Critical Introduction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
56.
Wakabi, Michael & Levi Ochieng, 1999. `We Cannot Let Criminals Hold Us to Ransom: Kagame Interview ', The East African, 7—13 July; available at http://www.nationaudio.com/News/EastAfrican/070799/Opinion/Opinion12.html (accessed 6 February 2006).
57.
Waltz, Kenneth, 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58.
Weldes, Jutta, 1996. `Constructing National Interest', European Journal of International Relations2(3): 275—318.
59.
Weldes, Jutta, 2003. `Discussion Paper on Discourse and Identity', paper presented at the conference `Identity Matters . . . and How', Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 31 May.
