The use of alcohol-based hand sanitizers is recommended as one of several strategies to minimize contamination and spread of the COVID-19 disease. Current reports suggest that the virucidal potential of ethanol occurs at concentrations close to 70%. Traditional methods of verifying the ethanol concentration in such products invite potential errors due to the viscosity of chemical components or may be prohibitively expensive to undertake in large demand. Near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy and chemometrics have already been used for the determination of ethanol in other matrices and present an alternative fast and reliable approach to quality control of alcohol-based hand sanitizers. In this study, a portable NIR spectrometer combined with classification chemometric tools, i.e., partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS–DA) and linear discriminant analysis with successive algorithm projection (SPA–LDA) were used to construct models to identify conforming and non-conforming commercial and laboratory synthesized hand sanitizer samples. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied in an exploratory data study. Three principal components accounted for 99% of data variance and demonstrate clustering of conforming and non-conforming samples. The PLS–DA and SPA–LDA classification models presented 77 and 100% of accuracy in cross/internal validation respectively and 100% of accuracy in the classification of test samples. A total of 43% commercial samples evaluated using the PLS–DA and SPA–LDA presented ethanol content non-conforming for hand sanitizer gel. These results indicate that use of NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics is a promising strategy, yielding a method that is fast, portable, and reliable for discrimination of alcohol-based hand sanitizers with respect to conforming and non-conforming ethanol concentrations.
EdmondsSMacingaDMays-SukoP.Comparative efficacy of commercially available alcohol-based handrubs and WHO-recommended handrubs: which is more critical, alcohol content or product formulation?Am J Infect Control. 2011,
39: E19–E20.
2.
BrownSMLubimovaAVKhrustalyevaNM, et al.
Use of an alcohol-based hand rub and quality improvement interventions to improve hand hygiene in a Russian neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003,
24: 172–179.
3.
Grandiere PerezLRamanantsoaCBeaudronA, et al.
Efficacy of an ethanol-based hand sanitizer for the disinfection of blood pressure cuffs. IJERPH. 2019,
16: 4342.
4.
NasutionTAYunitaRPasaribuAP, et al.
Effectiveness hand washing and hand rub method in reducing total bacteria colony from nurses in Medan. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019,
7: 3380–3383.
KampfGTodtDPfaenderS, et al.
Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. J Hosp Infect. 2020,
104: 246–251.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Temporary policy for preparation of certain alcohol-based hand sanitizer products during the public health emergency (COVID-19), www.fda.gov/media/136289/download (2020, accessed 23 April 2020).
ChanAPLChanTYK.Methanol as an unlisted ingredient in supposedly alcohol-based hand rub can pose serious health risk. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018,
15: 6–11.
19.
BećKBHuckCW.Breakthrough potential in near-infrared spectroscopy: spectra simulation. A review of recent developments. Front Chem. 2019,
7: 48.
20.
WuZOuyangGShiX, et al.
Absorption and quantitative characteristics of C-H bond and O-H bond of NIR. Opt Spectrosc. 2014,
117: 703–709.
21.
KumarS.Analytical techniques for natural product research. India: CABI, 2015. p.256.
22.
SilvaCSBrazAPimentelMF.Vibrational spectroscopy and chemometrics in forensic chemistry: critical review, current trends and challenges. J Braz Chem Soc. 2019,
30: 2259–2290.
23.
CastritiusSKronASchäferT, et al.
Determination of alcohol and extract concentration in beer samples using a combined method of near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy and refractometry. J Agric Food Chem. 2010,
58: 12634–12641.
24.
NascimentoRJAMacedoGRSantosES, et al.
Real time and in situ near-infrared spectroscopy (nirs) for quantitative monitoring of biomass, glucose, ethanol and glycerine concentrations in an alcoholic fermentation. Braz J Chem Eng. 2017,
34: 459–468.
25.
CozzolinoDDambergsRGJanikL, et al.
Analysis of grapes and wine by near infrared spectroscopy. J Near Infrared Spectrosc. 2006,
14: 279–289.
26.
LiuWLiuGWangX, et al. Non-invasive measurement study of human blood alcohol concentration based on NIR dynamic spectrum. In: 2011 international conference on image analysis and signal processing., Hubei, 2011, pp.492–495.
27.
LipovetskyS. Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis in chemometrics by Kurt Varmuza and Peter Filzmoser. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2009, p.336.
28.
BarkerMRayensW.Partial least squares for discrimination. J Chemometrics. 2003,
17: 166–173.
29.
BallabioDConsonniV.Classification tools in chemistry. Part 1: linear models. PLS-DA. Anal Methods. 2013,
5: 3790–3798.
30.
PontesMJCGalvãoRKHAraújoMCU, et al.
The successive projections algorithm for spectral variable selection in classification problems. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2005,
78: 11–18.
31.
SilvaACLira PontesLFBPimentelMF, et al.
Detection of adulteration in hydrated ethyl alcohol fuel using infrared spectroscopy and supervised pattern recognition methods. Talanta. 2012,
93: 129–134.
32.
AadilRMMadniGMRoobabU, et al. 1 – Quality control in beverage production: an overview. Quality control in the beverage industry..
Cambridge, MA:
Academic Press, 2019, pp.1–38.
33.
KumagaiMSuyamaHSatoT, et al.
Discrimination of plastics using a portable near infrared spectrometer. J Near Infrared Spectrosc. 2002,
10: 247–255.
34.
SaranwongSSornsrivichaiJKawanoS.Performance of a portable near infrared instrument for brix value determination of intact mango fruit. J Near Infrared Spectrosc. 2003,
11: 175–181.
35.
RisolutiRGullifaGBattistiniA, et al. “
Lab-on-click” detection of illicit drugs in oral fluids by MicroNIR – chemometrics. Anal Chem. 2019,
91: 6435–6439.
JolliffeITCadimaJ.Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Phil Trans R Soc A 2016; 374: 1–16
38.
KennardRWStoneLA.Computer-aided design of experiments. Technometrics. 1969,
11: 137–148.
39.
MoraisCLMSantosMCDLimaKMG, et al.
Improving data splitting for classification applications in spectrochemical analyses employing a random-mutation Kennard-Stone algorithm approach. Bioinformatics. 2019,
35: 5257–5263.
40.
FisherRA.The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen. 1936,
7: 179–188.
41.
PontesMJCCortezJGalvãoRKH, et al.
Classification of Brazilian soils by using LIBS and variable selection in the wavelet domain. Anal Chim Acta. 2009,
642: 12–18.
42.
SoaresSFCGalvãoRKHPontesaMJC, et al.
A new validation criterion for guiding the selection of variables by the successive projections algorithm in classification problems. J Braz Chem Soc. 2014,
25: 176–181.
43.
PontesMJCGomesAAGalvãoRKH, et al.
Internal and external validation in SPA-LDA: a comparative study involving diesel/biodiesel blends. NIR News. 2012,
23: 6–8.
44.
XiaoboZJiewenZPoveyMJW, et al.
Variables selection methods in near-infrared spectroscopy. Anal Chim Acta. 2010,
667: 14–32.
