The hypothesis that older patients undergoing femoral-infrapopliteal bypass have a similar outcome as a matched younger group of patients undergoing the same operation was tested. Seventy-six femoral-infrapopliteal autogenous saphenous vein bypasses for critical limb ischemia were performed from 1985 to 1990. By using the life-table method, the primary and secondary patency, limb salvage and survival rates are analyzed and compared for older and younger age groups. Forty cases (53%) were performed in an elderly group, defined as age 70 or older. At 4 years, there was no significant difference between age groups in limb salvage and patency rates. However, operative mortality for the older age group was 12%, compared with 0% in the younger group (P = 0.0004). Thus, femoral-infrapopliteal autogenous vein bypass can be performed with comparable limb salvage and patency rates for an older age group, but the risk of operative mortality appears to be increased with age.
HarrisonLH. Historical aspects in the development of venous autografts. Ann Surg1976; 183: 101–6.
2.
BerganJJ, VeithFJ, BernhardVM. Randomization of autogenous vein and polytretrafluoroethylene grafts in femoral-distal reconstruction. Surgery1982; 92: 921–9.
3.
FoyleMA, WhittemoreAD, CouchNP, MannickJA. A comparison of in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for infrainguinal reconstruction. J Vasc Surg1987; 5: 46–52.
4.
DalmanRL, TaylorLM. Basic data related to infrainguinal revascularization procedures. Ann Vasc Surg1990; 4: 309–12.
5.
RutherfordRB, JonesDN, BergentzSE. Factors affecting the patency of infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg1988; 8: 236–46.
CranleyJJ, HafnerCD. Newer prosthetic material compared with autogenous saphenous vein for occlusive arterial disease of the lower extremity. Surgery1981; 89: 1–7.
8.
DonaldsonMC, MannickJA, WhittemoreAD. Femoral-distal bypass with in situ greater saphenous vein. Ann Surg1991; 213: 457–65.
9.
BergaminiTM, TowneJB, BandykDF. Experience with in situ saphenous vein bypasses during 1981 to 1989: determinant factors of long term patency. J Vasc Surg1991; 13: 137–49.
10.
BandykeDF, KaebnickHW, StewartGW, TowneJB. Durability of the in situ saphenous vein arterial bypass: a comparison of primary and secondary patency. J Vasc Surg1987; 5: 256–68.
11.
VeithFJ, GuptaSK, AscerE. Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg1986; 3: 104–14.
12.
Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group 141. Comparative evaluation of prosthetic, reversed, and in situ vein bypass grafts in distal popliteal and tibial-peroneal revascularization. Arch Surg1988; 123: 434–8.
13.
CogbillTH, LandercasperJ, StruttPJ, GundersenAL. Late results of peripheral vascular surgery in patients 80 years of age and older. Arch Surg1987; 122: 581–6.
14.
O'MaraCS, KilgoreTL, McMullanMH. Distal bypass for limb salvage in very elderly patients. Am Surg1987; 53: 66–70.
15.
FriedmanSG, KernerBA, FriedmanMS, MoccioCG. Limb salvage in elderly patients: is aggresive surgical therapy warranted?J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)1989; 30: 848–51.
16.
McLoughlinRF, FitzgeraldLP, O'DonnelJA. Limb salvage in the elderly. Ann Vasc Surg1989; 3: 11–13.
17.
LeatherRP, ShahDM, ChangBB, KaufmanJL. Resurrection of the in situ saphenous bypass: 1000 cases later. Ann Surg1988; 208: 435–42.
18.
DalsingMC, WhiteJV, YaoJS,. Infrapopliteal bypass for established gangrene of the forefoot or toes. J Vasc Surg1985; 5: 669–77.
19.
TaylorLM, EdwardsJM, PhinneyES, PorterJM. Reversed vein bypass to infrapopliteal arteries: modern results are superior to or equivalent to in situ bypass for patency and for vein utilization. Ann Surg1987; 205: 90–7.
20.
LeatherRP, ShahDM, KarmodyAM. Infrapopliteal arterial bypass for limb salvage: increased patency and utilization of the saphenous vein used in situ. Surgery1981; 90: 1000–8.
21.
TaylorLM, EdwardsJM, PorterJM. Present status of reversed vein bypass grafting: five year results of a modern series. J Vasc Surg1990; 11: 193–206.
22.
PetroR, PikeMC, ArmitageP. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. Br J Cancer1977; 35: 1–39.
23.
RutherfordRB, FlaniganDP, GuptaSK. Suggested standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Surg1986; 4: 80–94.
24.
McCannRL, ClementsFM. Silent myocardia ischemia in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery: incidence and association with perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality. J Vasc Surg1989; 9: 583–7.
25.
PlechaFR, VertinBJ, PlachaEJ. The early results of vascular surgery in patients 75 years of age and older: an analysis of 3259 cases. J Vasc Surg1985; 2: 769–74.
26.
ScherLA, VeithFJ, AscerE. Limb salvage in octogenarians and nonagenarians. Surgery1986; 99: 160–5.
27.
MannickJA. Improved limb salvage from modern infrainguinal artery bypass techniques. Surgery1992; 111: 361–2.
28.
HobsonRW, LynchTG, JamilZ. Results of revascularization and amputation in severe lower extremity ischemia: a five year clinical experience. J Vasc Surg1985; 2: 174–85.
29.
GoldmanL. Cardiac risks and complications of noncardiac surgery. Ann Surg1983; 198: 780–91.
30.
BerlaukJF, AbramsJH, GilmourIJ. Preoperative optimization of cardiovascular hemodynamics improves outcome in peripheral vascular surgery; a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg1991; 214: 289–99.
