A Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in Patients on Hemodialysis

The hospital records of 22 patients on hemodialysis undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, and 19 others undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were reviewed to compare the outcomes of these procedures in this population. Evidence of previous myocardial infarction or triple vessel or left main coronary artery disease was more common in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft than those undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Perioperative mortality and complication rates following coronary artery bypass graft (4.5% and 41%, respectively) were similar to those following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (5.3% and 42%). Cardiac event-free rates at 18 months by life-table analysis following coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were 87 ± 16% and 40 ± 14%, respectively. Survival at 18 months were 67 ± 17% following coronary artery bypass graft and 69 ± 14% following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cardiac events were observed to occur in three patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft at a median of 10 months, and in nine patients following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty at a median of 6 months. One patient required percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty after the initial coronary artery bypass graft. Seven patients required repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and two patients underwent coronary artery bypass graft after initial percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Although these conclusions are limited by the retrospective nature of the study, it is concluded that coronary artery bypass graft can be performed with morbidity and mortality equivalent to percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and provides better cardiac event-free rates than percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients on hemodialysis. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty does not appear to be justified in this population because of its unacceptably high restenosis and cardiac event rates.