To evaluate the evidence for and against routine testicular cancer screening by primary health care providers and patients (testicular self examination).
Setting—
Low reported frequency of routine screening for testicular cancer attributed to poor knowledge of the disease and how to screen for it.
Methods—
Literature based evaluation of the screening suitability of testicular cancer as a disease and palpation of the testis as the proposed screening test, and of the effectiveness of screening for testicular cancer.
Results—
Testicular cancer is not a major public health problem. Its low prevalence makes routine screening cost ineffective. As a screening test for the disease, palpation has high sensitivity but its levels of specificity and positive predictive value are unacceptable. Palpation of the testes has not been shown to reduce mortality or morbidity.
Conclusion—
There is insufficient evidence to justify routine screening for testicular cancer by health care providers and patients. This lack of evidence may better explain the low reported levels of screening than can ignorance of the evidence available.
National Cancer Institute. Working guidelines for early cancer detection: Rationale and supporting evidence to decrease mortality., Bethesda, Maryland: National Cancer Institute, 1987.
2.
American Cancer Society ed. Cancer book: Prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and cure., New York: Doubleday, 1986.
3.
Canadian Task Force. Canadian Task Force on the periodic examination: The periodic health examination, 1984 update. Can Med Assoc J, 1984;130:2–16.
4.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services: An assessment of the effectiveness of 169 interventions., Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1989:77.
5.
Imperial Cancer Research Fund. A whole new ball game. How to check for testicular cancer., London: Department of Health, 1995.
6.
WilsonJJungnerG. Principles and practice of screening for disease., Geneva: WHO, 1968:34. (Public health paper.).
7.
ColePMorrisonAS.Basic issues in cancer screening. In: MillerAB ed. Screening in cancer. A report of a UICC international workshop., Geneva: UICC, 1978;40:7–36. (UICC technical report series.).
8.
AustokerJ. Screening for ovarian, prostatic and testicular cancers. BMJ, 1994;309:315–20.
9.
SwerdlowAJ.The epidemiology of testicular cancer. Eur Urol, 1993;23(suppl 2):35–8.
10.
ParkinDMMuirCSWhelanSL eds. Cancer incidence in five continents., Lyons: International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO), 1992, Vol 6.
11.
KayeSBBoyleP. The impact of chemotherapy on germ cell tumours. Cancer Surv, 1989;8:631–46.
12.
WestlakeSJFrankJW.Testicular self-examination: An argument against routine teaching. Fam Pract, 1987;4:143–8.
13.
IammarinoNKScardinoPT.Testicular cancer: The role of the primary care physician in prevention and early detection. Tex Med, 1991;87:66–71.
14.
KratzikCAigingerPKuberWRisk factors for bilateral testicular germ cell tumors. Does heredity play a role?Cancer1991;68:916–21.
15.
LoyVDieckmannK-P. Prevalence of contralateral testicular intraepithelial neoplasia (carcinoma in situ) in patients with testicular germ cell tumor. Eur Urol, 1993;23:120–2.
16.
LenzSGiwercmanASkakkebaekNE.Ultrasound in detection of early neoplasia of the testis. Int J Androl1987; 10:187–90.
17.
NikzasDChampionAEFoxM. Germ cell tumors of the testis: Prognostic factors and results. Eur Urol, 1990;18:242–7.
18.
SladdenMDickinsonJ. Testicular cancer. How effective is screening?Aust Fam Physician1993;22:1350–6.
19.
ThornhillJAFennellyJJKellyDGPatient's delay in the presentation of testis cancer in Ireland. Br J Urol, 1987;59:447–51.
20.
Kromann-AndersenBHansenLBLarsenPNClinical versus ultrasonographic evaluation of scrotal disorders. Br J Urol, 1988;61:350–3.
21.
VogtHBMcHaleMS.Testicular cancer. Role of primary care physicians in screening and education. Postgrad Med, 1992;92:93–101.
22.
GoldenringJMPurtellE. Knowledge of testicular cancer risk and need for self-examination in college students: A call for equal time for men in teaching of early cancer detection techniques. Pediatrics, 1984;74:1093–6.
23.
DaneliyaEVGotsadzeDTPirtskhalaishviliGG.Lack of knowledge about testicular cancer as a factor of untimely diagnosis. Vopr Onkol, 1992;38:1254–8.
24.
MackeyMNaceyJDelahuntB. Awareness of testicular cancer in New Zealand men. Aust NZ J Surg, 1994;64:750–3.
25.
SandemanTF.Testicular self-examination. Australian Paediatric Journal, 1988;24:3–4.
26.
LindemanGJTiverKW.Management of testicular seminoma at Westmead Hospital from 1980 to 1987. Aust NZ J Surg, 1991;61:211–16.
27.
BoslGJVogelzangNJGoldmanAImpact of delay in diagnosis on clinical stage of testicular cancer. Lancet, 1981;ii:970–3.
28.
PattersonMWebsterPChinV. Identifying sources of delay in the presentation and treatment of testicular cancer. Report to the Northern Sydney Area Health Service., Sydney: Health Promotion Unit of Mona Vale Hospital and Centre for Applied Social Research, Macquarie University, 1992.
29.
ColePMorrisonAS.Basic issues in population screening for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1980;64:1263–72.
30.
MillerAB.The costs and benefits of breast cancer screening. Am J Prev Med, 1993;9:175–80.
31.
HollandWW.Screening: Reasons to be cautious. BMJ, 1993;306:1222–3.
32.
WardleJSteptoeASmithHBreast self-examination: Attitudes and practices among young women in Europe. Eur J Cancer Prev, 1995;4:61–8.
33.
KatzRCMeyersKWallsJ. Cancer awareness and self-examination practices in young men and women. J Behav Med, 1995;18:377–84.
34.
CummingsKMLamponeDMettlinCPontesJE.What young men know about testicular cancer. Prev Med1983; 12:326–30.
35.
NeefNScutchfieldFDElderJBenderSJ.Testicular self-examination by young men: An analysis of characteristics associated with practice. J Am Coll Health, 1991;39:187–90.
36.
WardleJSteptoeABurckhardtRTesticular self-examination: Attitudes and practices among young men in Europe. Prev Med, 1994;23:206–10.
37.
ThornhillJAConroyRMKellyDGPublic awareness of testicular cancer and the value of self-examination. BMJ, 1986;293:480–1.
38.
MellingerSAD.An analysis of the influence of selected variables on the practice of testicular self-examination by young male athletes at a state college., University of Maryland College Park, 1989. (PhD thesis.).
39.
SladdenMJDickinsonJ. General practitioners’ attitudes to screening for prostate and testicular cancers. Med J Aust, 1995;162:410–13.
40.
MisenerTRFullerSG.Testicular versus breast and colorectal cancer screening. Early detection practices of primary care physicians. Cancer Pract, 1995;3:310–16.
41.
CorrieDMuellerEJThompsonIM.Management of ultrasonically detected nonpalpable testis masses. Urology, 1991;38:429–31.
