‘They have to Show that they can Make it’: Vitality as a Criterion for the Prognosis of Premature Infants

Abstract

In this article, the vitality of premature infants will be described and discussed. Vitality was one of the main factors in a grounded theory study in which the aim was to generate knowledge concerning the ethical decision-making processes with which nurses and physicians are faced in a neonatal unit. Which assessments underlie decisions about whether to start, continue or stop medical treatment of very sick premature babies?

A descriptive study design, including 120 hours of field observations and 22 qualitative in-depth interviews with doctors and nurses, was chosen. Strauss and Glaser’s comparative method was used to analyse the field observations and interviews.

The findings indicate that life-and-death decisions are somewhat ambivalent; experience does not always make them easier. In situations of ambiguity, decisions also seem to be based upon the vitality of the babies concerned.

Keywords

decision making ethics nursing premature babies vitality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen MC , Donohue PK , Dusman AE. The limit of viability - neonatal outcome of infants born at 22 to 25 weeks’ gestation . N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1597-1601 .

O’Shea TM , Klinepeter KL , Goldstein DJ , Jackson BW , Dillard RG. Survival and developmental disability in infants with birth weights of 501 to 800 grams, born between 1979 and 1994 . Pediatrics 1997; 100: 982-986 .

Brinchmann BS. We did what we could; he was such a ‘nice’ baby. How do nurses and doctors make ethical decisions in the neonatal unit? A qualitative, comparative study (Norwegian) [Thesis]. Oslo: University of Oslo, 1997.

Brinchmann BS. We did what we could; he was such a ‘nice’ baby. How nurses and physicians make ethical decisions on a neonatal unit (Norwegian) . Vård i Norden (Nurs Sci Res Nordic countries) 1998; 18(2): 16-21 .

Brinchmann BS. Ethical decisions about neonates in Norway [Abstract] . Image 1999; 31: 276-277 .

Limits for the treatment of prematurely born infants (Norwegian) . Consensus conference 24-25 November 1998. (Report no. 13 from the Committee for the Consensus Conference Programme.) Oslo: Norwegian Research Council, 1998.

Udén G , Norberg A , Lindseth A , Marhaug V. Ethical reasoning in nurses’ and physicians’ stories about care episodes . J Adv Nurs 1992; 17: 1028-1034 .

Lindseth A , Udén G , Norberg A , Marhaug V. Registered nurses’ and physicians’ reflections on their narratives about ethically difficult care episodes . J Adv Nurs 1994; 20: 245-250 .

Holm S. Ethical problems in clinical practice - a study of the ethical reasoning of health care professionals. Manchester: Manchester University Press , 1997.

10.

McHaffie HE , Fowlie PW. Life, death and decisions. Doctors and nurses reflect on neonatal practice. Hale: Hochland and Hochland , 1996.

11.

Anspach RR. Deciding who lives: fateful choices in the intensive care nursery. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press , 1993.

12.

Glaser BG , Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: de Gruyter , 1967.

13.

Glaser BG. Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press , 1978.

14.

Glaser BG. Doing grounded theory: issues and discussions. Mill Valley: Sociology Press , 1998.

15.

Brinchmann BS. The ‘inquisitive’ one with the green book - field researcher and ‘grounded theorist’ on a neonatal unit (Norwegian) . Vård i Norden (Nurs Sci Res Nordic countries) 1998: 18(3): 20-25 .

16.

Raines DA. Values influencing neonatal nurses’ perceptions and choices . West J Nurs Res 1994; 16: 675-691 .

17.

Gilligan C. In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1982.

18.

Baker C , Wuest J , Stern PN. Method slurring: the grounded theory/phenomenology example . J Adv Nurs 1992; 17: 1355-1360 .