United Kingdom Transplant reported that, during 2007—2008, a total of 7655 people were awaiting a transplant; however, only 3235 organs were available via the current `opt in' approach. To address this shortfall, new UK legislation sought to increase the number of organs available for donation. The Chief Medical Officer for England and Wales supports the adoption of `presumed consent' legislation, that is, an `opt out' approach, as used in much of Europe. Little research, however, has explored the impact on bereaved relatives, nurses and medical staff of introducing presumed consent legislation. Adopting a phenomenological approach, this study used responses to an initial questionnaire combined with selected interviews with health care professionals to capture their direct experience of presumed consent legislation in three European countries: Portugal, Norway and Belgium.
Department of Health.Organs for transplants: a report from the Organ Donation Taskforce. London: DH, 2008.
3.
Department of Health.The potential impact of an opt out system for organ donation in the UK: an independent report from the Organ Donation Taskforce. London: DH, 2008.
4.
The Human Tissue Act 2004 (England and Wales), chapter 30. Retrieved 21 January, 2009, from: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2004/ukpga_20040030_en_1
5.
The Human Tissue (Scotland) Act 2006. Retrieved 21 January, 2009, from: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/legislation/scotland/acts2006/asp_20060004_en_1
6.
New B., Solomon M., Dingwall R., McHale J.A question of give and take: improving the supply of donor organs for transplantation. (Kings Fund Institute Research Report.)London: Kings Fund, 1994.
7.
Roels, L.Opt out registers for organ donation have existed in Belgium since 1987. BMJ1999; 318: 399.
8.
Gimbel RA, Strosberg MA, Lehrman SE, Genfenas E., Taft F.Presumed consent and other predictors of cadaveric organ donation in Europe . Prog Transplant2003; 13: 17-23.
9.
Abadie A., Gray S.The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: a cross country study. 2004. (NBER Working Group paper no. 10604.) Retrieved 21 January, 2009, from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w10604
10.
Coppen R., Friele RD, Marquet RI, Gevers SKM.Opting-out systems: no guarantee for higher donation rates. Transplant Int2005; 18: 1275-79.
11.
British Medical Association.Organ donation in the 21st century: time for a consolidated approach. London: BMA, 2000.
12.
British Broadcasting Corporation.Health donation: opt-in or opt-out, a BBC poll. 2007. Retrieved 21 January, 2009, from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7051235.stm
13.
Kozlowski LMCase study in identification and maintenance of an organ donor. Heart Lung1998; 17: 366-71.
14.
Riley PL, Coolican MBNeeds of families of organ donors: facing death and life. Crit Care Nurse1999; 19(2): 53-55.
15.
House of Lords: Report of the Science and Technology Committee. (Lord Jenkins of Roding, chairman.) The relationship between science and society, third report. London: House of Lords , 2000.
16.
Price D.Legal and ethical aspects of organ transplantation. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2002 .
17.
Prottas JM, Batten HLThe willingness to give: the public and the supply of transplantable organs . J Health Polit Policy Law1991; 16: 121-34.
18.
Beauchamp TL , Childress JFPrinciples of biomedical ethics, fifth edition. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2001.
19.
Lamb D.Organ transplants and ethics. London: Routledge, 1990.
20.
Ellis P.Organ donation and presumed consent [Letter]. Lancet1998; 352: 151.
Gillon R.On giving preference to prior volunteers when allocating organs for transplant . J Med Ethics1995; 21: 195-96.
23.
Wilks M.Organ donation and presumed consent. Lancet1998; 352: 151.
24.
Pellitier M.The organ donor family members' perception of stressful situations during the organ donation experience. J Adv Nurs1992; 17: 90-97.
25.
Robertson JADelimiting the donor: the Dead Donor Rule. Hastings Cent Rep1999; 29(6): 6-14.
26.
Koppelman ERThe Dead Donor Rule and concepts of death: severing the ties that bind them. Am J Bioethics2003 ; 3(1): 1-9.
27.
English V., Sommerville A.Presumed consent for transplantation: a dead issue after Alder Hey?J Med Ethics2003; 29: 147-52.
28.
Gore SM, Cable DJ, Holland AJOrgan donation from ICUs in England and Wales: two-year confidential audit of deaths in intensive care. BMJ1992 ; 304: 349-55.
29.
Haddow G.Donor and non-donor families' accounts of communication and relations with healthcare professionals. Prog Transplant2004; 14: 41-48.
30.
Garrison RN , Bentley FR, Raque GHThere is an answer to the shortage of organ donors. Surg Gynecol Obstet1991; 173: 391-96.
31.
Niles PA, Mattice C.The timing factor in the consent process. J Transpl Coord1996; 6: 84-87
32.
Sque M, Payne S eds. Organ and tissue donation: an evidence base for practice . Maidenhead: Open University Press , 2007.
33.
Singer P., Rachmani R.Improving attitude and knowledge of healthcare professionals towards organ donation in Israel: results of 12 European donor hospital education programs . Transplant Proc1997; 29: 3244-45.
34.
Randhawa G.Specialist nurse training programme dealing with asking for organ donation. J Am Nurs1998; 28: 405-408.
35.
Verble M., Worth J.Overcoming families' fears and concerns in donation discussion [Progress in transplantation]. J Transpl Coord2000; 10: 155-60.
36.
Qualitative Software Research International.Nvivo computerised data management system. Victoria, Australia: QSR, 2002.
37.
Heidegger M.Being and time. (Maquarie J, Robinson E trans.)Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1962.
38.
Assembeia da Republica. (Republic Assembly.)Colheita e transplante de organos e tecidos de origem humana. Lei no 12/93. (Law of Portugal: Collection and transplant of organs and tissues of human origin. No. 12/93.)Quinta-feria I A Serie1960-1963; 94 (in Portuguese).
39.
Executive Legal Advisory Body of Belgium.Koninklijk besluit tot regeling van de waarope de donor of de personen betreffende het wegnemen en transplanteren van organen hun will te kennen geven. (Royal decision concerning regulations pertaining to donors or persons making their wishes known for the removal and transplantation of organs.)Brussels: Department of Justice Public Health and Environment , 1996 (in Dutch).
40.
Royal Norwegian Department of Health and Social Services.Forskiter om dodsdefinisjonen i relasjon til lov om transplantasjon, sykehusobduksjon og avgivelse av lik M.M. (Act relating to transplantation, hospital autopsies and the donation of bodies.)Oslo: DHSS, 2004 (in Norwegian).
41.
European Transplant Co-ordinators Organisation.The European Donor Hospital Education Programme (EDHEP). Retrieved 21 January, 2009, from: http://www.etco.org/certification_transplant.htm
42.
Nowenstein Piery G.Organ procurement rates: does presumed consent legislation really make a difference?Electronic Law Journals LGD, 2004; 1. Retrieved 21 January, 2009, from: http://www.2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2004_1/nowenstein/
