A comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching in nursing ethics education

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the learning effectiveness of peer tutored problem-based learning and conventional teaching of nursing ethics in Taiwan. The study adopted an experimental design. The peer tutored problem-based learning method was applied to an experimental group and the conventional teaching method to a control group. The study sample consisted of 142 senior nursing students who were randomly assigned to the two groups. All the students were tested for their nursing ethical discrimination ability both before and after the educational intervention. A learning satisfaction survey was also administered to both groups at the end of each course. After the intervention, both groups showed a significant increase in ethical discrimination ability. There was a statistically significant difference between the ethical discrimination scores of the two groups (P < 0.05), with the experimental group on average scoring higher than the control group. There were significant differences in satisfaction with self-motivated learning and critical thinking between the groups. Peer tutored problem-based learning and lecture-type conventional teaching were both effective for nursing ethics education, but problem-based learning was shown to be more effective. Peer tutored problem-based learning has the potential to enhance the efficacy of teaching nursing ethics in situations in which there are personnel and resource constraints.

Keywords

ethical discrimination ability learning satisfaction nursing ethics teaching peer tutor problem-based learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gastmans C. A fundamental ethical approach to nursing: some proposals for ethics education . Nurs Ethics 2002; 9: 494-507.

Horton K. , Tschudin V. , Forget A. The value of nursing: a literature review. Nurs Ethics 2007; 14: 716-40.

Hosmer L. Adding ethics to the business curriculum. Business Horizon 1998; 31(4): 21-34.

Ketefian S. Legal and ethical issues: ethics content in nursing education. J Prof Nurs 1999; 15(3): 138.

Vanlaere L. , Gastmans C. Ethics in nursing education: learning to reflect on care practices . Nurs Ethics 2007; 14: 758-66.

Görgülü RS , Dinç L. Ethics in Turkish nursing education programs . Nurs Ethics 2007; 14: 741-52.

Beers GW The effect of teaching method on objective test scores: problem-based learning versus lecture. J Nurs Educ 2005; 44: 305-9.

Nilstun T. , Cuttini M. , Saracci R. Teaching medical ethics to experienced staff: participants, teachers and method . J Med Ethics 2001; 27: 409-12.

Tam M. Learning matters at Lingnan. http://www.ln.edu.hk/tlc/learning_matters/05-2001-242001.pdf (2001, accessed August 2008).

10.

Bell SM , Ziegler M. , McCallum RS What adult educators know compared with what they say they know about providing research-based reading instruction. J Adolesc Adult Literacy 2004; 47: 542-63.

11.

Luh SP , Lin YR , Lin CS , Lee MC , Chen JY The students’ and tutor’s role in problem based learning . J Med Educ 2004; 8: 358-62 (in Chinese).

12.

Belzer A. What are they doing in there? Case studies of volunteer tutors and adult literacy learners. J Adolesc Adult Literacy 2006; 49: 560-72.

13.

Economist Intelligence Unit. Script-clinical economics: estimating the value of health care services. Health Care Int 2000; (2): 66,67,72-75.

14.

Department of Health. National health statistics. http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_2.aspx?now_fod_list_no=9883&class_no=440&level_no=2 (2005, accessed April 2009).

15.

Goldie J. , Schwartz L. , McConnachie A. , Morrison J. Impact of a new course on students’ potential behaviour on encountering ethical dilemmas. Med Educ 2001; 35: 295-302.

16.

Rosenblatt M. The educational effectiveness of problem-based learning discussions as evaluated by learner-assessed satisfaction and practice change. J Clin Anesth 2004; 16: 596-601.

17.

Koh GCH , Khoo HE , Wong ML , Koh D. The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: a systematic review. CMAJ 2008; 178: 34-41.

18.

Goldie J. , Schwartz L. , McConnachie A. , Morrison J. The impact of three years’ ethics teaching, in an integrated medical curriculum, on students’ proposed behavior on meeting ethical dilemmas . Med Educ 2002; 36: 489-97.

19.

Aveyard H. , Edwards S. , West S. Core topics of health care ethics. The identification of core topics for interprofessional education. J Interprof Care 2005; 19: 63-9.

20.

Li B. Ethics teaching in medical schools. Hastings Cent Rep 2000; 30(4): S30-2.

21.

Zickmund SL Care and justice: the impact of gender and profession on ethical decision making in the healthcare arena. J Clin Ethics 2004; 15: 176-87.

22.

Kwan C-Y. , Seib R. , Parikh P. , et al. Personal journeys to PBL: retrospect from unit-2 medical students at McMaster University. J Med Educ 2005; 9(2): 63-76 (in Chinese).

23.

Chaves JF , Baker CM , Chaves JA , et al. Self, peer, and tutor assessments of MSN competencies using the PBL-evaluator. J Nurs Educ 2006; 45: 25-31.

24.

Choi H. , Choi H. A problem-based learning trial on the internet involving undergraduate nursing students. J Nurs Educ 2003; 42: 359-63.

25.

Alexander JG , McDaniel GS , Baldwin MS , et al. Promoting, applying, and evaluating problem-based learning in the undergraduate nursing curriculum. Nurs Educ Perspect 2002; 23: 248-53.