Informed consent practices of Chinese nurse researchers

Abstract

Nursing research in China is at an early stage of development and little is known about the practices of Chinese nurse researchers. This interview study carried out at a university in central China explores the informed consent practices of Chinese nurse researchers and the cultural considerations of using a western technique. Nine semistructured interviews were conducted in English with assistance and simultaneous translation from a Chinese nurse with research experience. The interviews were analyzed by one western and two Chinese researchers and major themes were identified. All participants endorsed informed consent as ethically required. Differences were noted between some of the informed consent practices typically recommended in the USA and those identified in this study, such as: recruitment using local and government officials, recruiting directly from medical records without special permission, family consultation in consent and consent control, and not revealing randomization to intervention groups receiving different treatments.

Keywords

China informed consent interview methodology research ethics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law no. 10", vol. 2, p.181-2. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1949. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/references/nurcode.htm (1949, accessed May 2008).

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, 2004. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html ( 2004, accessed May 2008).

The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research, 1979. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html (1979, accessed May 2008).

Foucault M. (Hurley R trans.) The care of the self. New York: Vintage Books, 1986.

Foucault M. (Hurley R trans). Ethics: subjectivity and truth. New York : The New Press, 1997.

Taylor C. Sources of the self: the making of modern identity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press , 1989.

Nesbitt R. The geography of thought. New York: Free Press, 2003.

Pang SMC. Nursing ethics in modern China. New York: Rodopi, 2003.

Chan H. Sharing death and dying: advance directives, autonomy and the family . Bioethics 2004; 18(2): 87-103.

10.

Tsai D. The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy. J Med Ethics 2005; 31: 159-63.

11.

Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Regulations on ethical review of biomedical research involving human subjects, 2007. http://www.chinaphs.org/bioethics/regulations_&_laws.htm ( 2007, November 2009).

12.

Hsieh H. , Shannon S. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualit Health Res 2005; 15: 1277-88.

13.

Pang SMC. Protective truthfulness: the Chinese way in safeguarding patients in informed treatment decisions. J Med Ethics 1999; 25: 247-53.

14.

Legge J. trans. Confucian analects, the great learning and the doctrine of the mean . New York: Dover, 1971.

15.

Moreno J. , Caplan AL , Wolpe PR , et al. Updating protections for human subjects involved in research . JAMA 1998; 280: 1951-8.

16.

Tri-Council Policy Statement. Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Medical Research Council of Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, 1998. http://pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/pdf/TCPS%20October%202005_E.pdf (1998, accessed June 2008).

17.

Unaids. Ethical considerations in HIV preventative vaccine research, 2000. http://data.unaids.org/publications/IRC-pub01/JC072-EthicalCons_en.pdf ( 2000, accessed May 2008).

18.

Weijer C. , Emanuel E. Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science 2000; 19: 1142-4.

19.

Olsen D. HIPAA privacy regulations and nursing research. Nurs Res 2003; 52: 344-8.

20.

Corbett F. , Oldham J. , Lilford R. Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants. J Med Ethics 1996; 22: 227-31.

21.

Levine R. Ethics and the regulation of clinical research, second edition. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1986.

22.

DHHS, Food and Drug Administration. International conference on harmonization: guidance on statistical principles for clinical trials. Federal Register 1998 ; 63: 49583-98.

23.

Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research . NEJM 1987; 317: 141-5.

24.

Katz J. The regulation of human research - reflections and proposals. Clin Res 1973; 21: 785-91.

25.

Olsen D.

Equipoise: an appropriate standard for ethical review of nursing research?

J Adv Nurs 2000; 31: 267-73.

26.

Kimmelman J. The therapeutic misconception at 25: treatment, research, and confusion. Hastings Cent Rep 2007; 37(6): 36-42.

27.

Lidz C. , Appelbaum P. , Grisso T. , Renaud M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials . Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 1689-97.