Information disclosure to family caregivers: Applying Thiroux’s framework

Abstract

In the UK, community care has led to more complex relationships for mental health nurses. They need to respect the rights of service users to confidentiality while also respecting the rights of family caregivers to information that directly affects them. An unsatisfactory situation has arisen in which utilitarian and legally driven motives have seen family caregivers’ interests become subsidiary to those of service users and providers. An ethical case is made for sharing information with family caregivers, even against the wishes of service users. Through the use of a conceptual framework based on elements proposed by Thiroux — value of life, goodness or rightness, justice or fairness, truth-telling or honesty, and individual freedom — the article concludes that there is an ethical argument for sharing some information with family caregivers and that nurses should respect caregivers’ rights through their actions. Nurses’ actions are a commitment to seeking what is ‘good’ by making judgements based on what matters. It is argued that people and their relationships matter more than strict adherence to laws and codes.

Keywords

ethics family caregivers information sharing mental health nurses

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chien WT , Chan S. , Morrissey J. , et al. Effectiveness of a mutual support group for families of patients with schizophrenia. J Adv Nurs 2005; 51: 595-608.

Pinfold V. , Farmer P. , Rapaport J. , et al. Positive and inclusive? Effective ways for professionals to involve carers in information sharing. Report to the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO), 2005 . http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/project/54-final-report.pdf (2005, accessed February 2010).

Maher J. , Green H. Carers 2000. London: The Stationery Office, 2002.

Jones D. Myths, madness and the family: the impact of mental illness on families. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2001.

Ramon S. Psychiatry in Britain: meaning and policy. London: Croom Helm, 1985.

Roick C. , Heider D. , Bebbington PE , et al. Burden on caregivers of people with schizophrenia: comparison between Germany and Britain. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190: 333-8.

Repper J. , Grant G. , Nolan M. , Enderby P. Partnerships in Carer Assessment Project (PICAP). Sheffield : University of Sheffield and Service Delivery and Organisation programme, 2006.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Schizophrenia: core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in primary and secondary care (update). (National Clinical Practice Guideline 82.) London: National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (commissioned by NICE), 2009.

Kartolova-O’Doherty Y. , Doherty DT

Satisfied carers of persons with enduring mental illness: who and why?

Int J Soc Psychiatry 2009; 55: 257-71.

10.

Department of Health. NHS confidentiality code of practice. London: DH, 2003.

11.

Rethink. Who cares? The experiences of mental health carers accessing services and information. Kingston Upon Thames: Rethink, 2003.

12.

Gray B. , Robinson C. , Seddon D. , Roberts A. ‘Confidentiality smokescreens’ and carers for people with mental health problems: the perspectives of professionals. Health Soc Care Community 2008; 16: 378-87.

13.

Scott PA Virtue, nursing and the moral domain of practice. In: Tschudin V (ed.) Approaches to ethics: nursing beyond boundaries . Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann , 2003, p.25-32.

14.

Thiroux JP Ethics: theory and practice, fifth edition. Old Tappan, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2005.

15.

Tschudin V (ed.) Confidentiality in ethics, nurses and patients. London: Scutari, 1993.

16.

Centre for Suicide Prevention. Independent homicide investigations: The National Confidential Inquiry into Suicides and Homicides by People with Mental Illness. Manchester: University of Manchester, 2008.

17.

Nielssen OB , Westmore BD , Large MM , et al. Homicide during psychotic illness in New South Wales between 1993 and 2002. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 301-4.

18.

Nursing and Midwifery Council : The code: standards of conduct, performance and ethics for nurses and midwives . London: NMC, 2008.

19.

Hugman R. New approaches in ethics in the caring professions. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

20.

Joolaee S. , Nikbakht-Nasrabadi A. , Parsa-Yekta Z. , Tschudin V. , Mansouri I. An Iranian perspective on patients’ rights. Nurs Ethics 2006; 13: 488-502.

21.

Izumi S. Bridging western ethics and Japanese local ethics by listening to nurses’ concerns. Nurs Ethics 2006; 13: 275-83.

22.

Parfitt D. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.

23.

Oppenheimer H. Mattering. In: Tschudin V (ed.) Approaches to ethics: nursing beyond boundaries . Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann , 2003, p.73-82.

24.

Austin W. , Bergum V. , Dosseter J. Relational ethics: an action ethic as a foundation for health care. In: Tschudin V (ed.) Approaches to ethics: nursing beyond boundaries. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann, 2003: p.45-52.

25.

Winch S. Constructing a morality of caring: codes and values in Australian carer discourse . Nurs Ethics 2006; 13: 5-16.