Technology has expanded genomic research and the complexity of extracted gene-related information. Health-related genomic incidental findings pose new dilemmas for nurse researchers regarding the ethical application of disclosure to participants. Consequently, informed consent specific to incidental findings is recommended. Critical Social Theory is used as a guide in recognition of the changing meaning of informed consent and to serve as a framework to inform nursing of the ethical application of disclosure consent in genomic nursing research practices.
ChoMK. Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics. J Law Med Ethics2008; 36(2): 280–285, 212.
2.
Nurses ICo. Codes and declarations. Nurs Ethics2003; 10(3): 323–325.
3.
WolfSMLawrenzFPNelsonCA. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics2008; 36(2): 219–248, 211.
4.
MeachamMCStarksHBurkeW. Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics2010; 5(3): 31–41.
FabsitzRRMcGuireASharpRR. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circ Cardivasc Genet2010; 3: 574–580.
7.
DeCampMSugarmanJ. Ethics in behavioral genetics research. Account Res2004; 11(1): 27–47.
8.
GiarelliE. Safeguarding being: a bioethical principle for genetic nursing care. Nurs Ethics2003; 10(3): 255–268.
9.
HoedemaekersRGordijnBHeksterY. The complexities of ethical evaluation of genomics research. HEC Forum2006; 18(1): 18–36.
10.
UlrichCMWallenGW. Ethics and genetics: what should every advanced practice nurse know?Clin Sch Rev2008; 1(2): 69–71.
11.
GoeringSHollandSFryer-EdwardsK. Transforming genetic research practices with marginalized communities: a case for responsive justice. Hastings Cent Rep2008; 38(2): 43–53.
Van NessB. Genomic research and incidental findings. J Law Med Ethics2008; 36(2): 292–297.12.
14.
MillerTBoultonM. Changing constructions of informed consent: qualitative research and complex social worlds. Soc Sci Med2007; 65(11): 2199–2211.
15.
BurnsNGroveSK. The practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis and generation of evidence. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders, 2009.
16.
RodgersBL. Developing nursing knowledge: philosophical traditions and influences. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
17.
ManiasEStreetA. Possibilities for critical social theory and Foucault’s work: a toolbox approach. Nurs Inq1999; 7(1): 50–60.
18.
KimHHolterI. Critical theory for science of nursing practice. In: OmeryACarperC andPageE (eds) In search of nursing science. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1995, pp.205–232.
19.
HabermasJT. The theory of communicative action(Vol. 1). Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1981.
20.
CarrWKremmisS. Becoming critical: knowing through action research. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press, 1983.
21.
SumnerJ. A critical lens on the instrumentation of caring in nursing theory. ANS Adv Nurs Sci2010; 33(1): E17–E26.
22.
HabermasJT. Knowledge and human interests. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1971.
23.
FayB. Critical social science: liberation and its limits. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.
24.
CalhounC. Critical social theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1995.
KristmanVLKreigerN. Information disclosure in population-based research involving genetics: a framework for the practice of ethics in epidemiology. Ann Epidemiol2008; 18(4): 335–341.
EpsteinRMKoronesDNQuillTE. Withholding information from patients –when less is more. N Engl J Med2010; 362(5): 380–381.
29.
MillerFAHayeemsRZBombardYClinical obligations and public health programmes: healthcare provider reasoning about managing the incidental results of newborn screening. J Med Ethics2009; 35: 625–634.
30.
WilliamsJK. Genetic testing: implications for professional nursing. J Prof Nurs1998; 14(3): 184–188.
31.
KeaneMA. Institutional review board approaches to the incidental findings problem. J Law Med Ethics2008; 36(2): 352–355. 213.
HemMHHeggenKRuyterKW. Questionable requirement for consent in observational research in psychiatry. Nurs Ethics2007; 14(1): 41–53.
34.
BoschmaGYongeOMychajlunowL. Consent in oral history interviews: unique challenges. Qual Health Res2003; 13(1): 129–135.
35.
BeauchampTLChildressJF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
36.
ArarNHHazudaHSteinbachR. Ethical issues associated with conducting genetic family studies of complex disease. Ann Epidemiol2005; 15(9): 712–719.
37.
GodardBHurlimannTLetendreM. Guidelines for disclosing genetic information to family members: from development to use. Fam Cancer2006; 5: 103–116.
38.
BurkeWDiekemaDS. Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research. J Pediatr2006; 149(Suppl 1): S34–S38.
39.
IredaleR. Eugenics and its relevance to contemporary health care. Nurs Ethics2000; 7(3): 205–214.
40.
Wacker-GuidoG. Legal and ethical issues in nursing. Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2006.
41.
CassellsJJenkinsJDimnodE. An ethical assessment framework for addressing global genetic issues in clinical practice. Oncol Nurs Forum2003; 30(3): 383–390.
