Although respect and human presence are frequently reported in nursing literature, these are poorly defined within a nursing context. The aim of this study was to examine the differences, if any, in the perceived frequency of respect and human presence in the clinical care, between nurses and patients. A convenience sample of 1537 patients and 1148 nurses from six European countries (Cyprus, Czech Republic, Finland, Greece, Hungary and Italy) participated in this study during autumn 2009. The six-point Likert-type Caring Behaviours Inventory-24 questionnaire was used for gathering appropriate data. The findings showed statistically significant differences of nurses’ and patients’ perception of frequency on respect and human presence. These findings provide a better understanding of caring behaviours that convey respect and assurance of human presence to persons behind the patients and may contribute to close gaps in knowledge regarding patients’ expectations.
GastmansC. Care as a moral attitude in nursing. Nurs Ethics1999; 6: 214–223.
7.
SherwoodGD. Meta-synthesis of qualitative analyses of caring: defining a therapeutic model of nursing. Adv Pract Nurs Q1997; 3: 32–42.
8.
Finfgeld-ConnettD. Meta-synthesis of caring in nursing. J Clin Nurs2008; 17: 196–204.
9.
CutcliffeJRMcKennaHP. The essential concepts of nursing: building blocks for practice. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2005.
10.
GallagherA. The respectful nurse. Nurs Ethics2007; 14: 360–371.
11.
KyleTV. The concept of caring: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs1995; 21: 506–514.
12.
PatisteaE. Nurses’ perceptions of caring as documented in theory and research. J Clin Nurs1999; 8: 487–495.
13.
PapastavrouEEfstathiouGCharalambousA. Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of caring behaviours: quantitative systematic review of comparative studies. J Adv Nurs2011; 67(6): 1191–1205.
14.
PapastavrouEEfstathiouGTsangariHA cross-cultural study of the concept of caring through behaviours: patients’ and nurses’ perspectives in six different EU countries. J Adv Nurs2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05807.x.
15.
GodkinJGodkinL. Caring behaviors among nurses: fostering a conversation of gestures. Health Care Manage Rev2004; 29: 258–267.
16.
OstermanPSchwartz-BarcottD. Presence: four ways of being there. Nurs Forum1996; 31: 23–30.
17.
GodkinJGodkinLAustinP. Nursing presence, patient satisfaction, and the bottom line. J Hosp Mark Public Relations2002; 14: 15–33.
18.
BaillieLFordPGallagherANurses’ views on dignity in care. Nurs Older People2009; 21: 22–29.
19.
Van ThielGJVan DeldenJJ. The principle of respect for autonomy in the care of nursing home residents. Nurs Ethics2001; 8: 419–431.
20.
RoseDNPeterEGallopRRespect in forensic psychiatric nurse-patient relationships: a practical compromise. J Forensic Nurs2011; 7: 3–16.
21.
SuhonenRValimakiMLeino-KilpiH. A review of outcomes of individualised nursing interventions on adult patients. J Clin Nurs2008; 17: 843–860.
22.
WolfZRMillerPADevineM. Relationship between nurse caring and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing invasive cardiac procedures. Medsurg Nurs2003; 12: 391–396.
23.
WatsonJ. Nursing: human science and human care: a theory of nursing. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1985.
24.
WatsonJ and Watson Caring Science Institute. Assessing and measuring caring in nursing and health sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2009.
25.
PapastavrouEEfstathiouG. Instruments measuring the concept of caring (in Greek). Nurs Care Res2010; 26: 25–35.
BeauchampTL. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
28.
GnardelisC. Analyzing data with PASW Statistics 17.0. Athens: Papazisis, 2009.
29.
HowittDCramerD. Introduction to SPSS in psychology: for version 16 and earlier. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008.
30.
BaillieLGallagherA. Respecting dignity in care in diverse care settings: strategies of UK nurses. Int J Nurs Pract2011; 17: 336–341.
31.
TayLHHegneyDAngE. Factors affecting effective communication between registered nurses and adult cancer patients in an inpatient setting: a systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc2011; 9: 151–164.
32.
LeiterMPMaslachC. Areas of worklife scale manual. 4th ed. Wolfville, NS: Acadia University, 2006.
33.
OultonJA. The global nursing shortage: an overview of issues and actions. Policy Polit Nurs Pract2006; 7: 34S–39S.
34.
ChangYLinYPChangHJCancer patient and staff ratings of caring behaviors: relationship to level of pain intensity. Canc Nurs2005; 28: 331–339.
35.
WuYLarrabeeJHPutmanHP. Caring Behaviors Inventory: a reduction of the 42-item instrument. Nurs Res2006; 55: 18–25.
36.
GuidrozAMBurnfield-GeimerJLClarkOThe nursing incivility scale: development and validation of an occupation-specific measure. J Nurs Meas2010; 18: 176–200.
37.
SuhonenRPapastavrouEEfstathiouGNurses’ perceptions of individualized care: an international comparison. J Adv Nurs2011; 67: 1895–1907.
38.
CamerinoDEstryn-BeharMConwayPMWork-related factors and violence among nursing staff in the European NEXT study: a longitudinal cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud2008; 45: 35–50.
39.
LangfredC. Work-group design and autonomy: a field of study of the interaction between task interdependence and group autonomy. Small Group Res2000; 31: 54–69.
40.
BowlingA. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. 3rd ed. Berkshire: Open University Press, 2009.
41.
PolitDBeckCTHunglerB. Essentials of nursing research: methods, appraisal and utilization. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
