The overall purpose of this cross-country Nordic study was to gain further knowledge about maintaining and promoting dignity in nursing home residents. The purpose of this article is to present results pertaining to the following question: How is nursing home residents’ dignity maintained, promoted or deprived from the perspective of family caregivers? In this article, we focus only on indignity in care. This study took place at six different nursing home residences in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Data collection methods in this part of this study consisted of individual research interviews. Altogether, the sample consisted of 28 family caregivers of nursing home residents. The empirical material was interpreted using a hermeneutical approach. The overall theme that emerged was as follows: ‘A feeling of being abandoned’. The sub-themes are designated as follows: deprived of the feeling of belonging, deprived of dignity due to acts of omission, deprived of confirmation, deprived of dignity due to physical humiliation, deprived of dignity due to psychological humiliation and deprived of parts of life.
ErikssonK.Om människans värdighet [On human dignity]. In: BjerkreimTMathisenJNordR (eds) Visjon, viten og virke[Vision, knowledge and profession]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1996, pp. 79–86(in Swedish).
2.
ErikssonK.Vårdvetenskap som akademisk disciplin[Caring science as academic discipline]. Vaasa: Department of Caring Science, Åbo Akademi University, 2001(in Swedish).
3.
EdlundM. Människans värdighet – ett grundbegrepp inom vårdvetenskapen[Human dignity – a basic caring science concept]. Doctoral Thesis, Åbo Akademi University Press, Finland, 2002.
4.
BarhamD.Students’ corner. The last 48 hours of life. Contemp Nurse2002; 13(2/3): 179–191.
5.
GallagherA. Dignity and respect for dignity – two key health professional values: implications for nursing practice. Nurs Ethics2004; 11(6): 587–599.
WoolheadGCalnanMDieppePDignity in older age: what do older people in the United Kingdom think?Age Ageing2004; 33(2): 165–170.
21.
JacelonCS. The dignity of elders in an acute care hospital. Qual Health Res2003; 13(4): 543–556.
22.
TaddWClarkeALloydLThe value of nurses’ codes: European nurses’ views. Nurs Ethics2006; 13(4): 376–393.
23.
CalnanMWoolheadGDieppePViews on dignity in providing health care for older people. Nurs Times2005; 101(33): 38–41.
24.
WoolheadGTaddWBoix-FerrerJA‘Tu’ or ‘Vous?’ A European qualitative study of dignity and communication with older people in health and social care settings. Patient Educ Couns2006; 61(3): 363–371.
25.
GallagherALiSWainwrightPDignity in the care of older people – a review of the theoretical and empirical literature. BMC Nurs2008; 7: 11.
26.
JakobsenRSørlieV. Dignity in older people in nursing home: narratives of care providers. Nurs Ethics2010; 17(3): 289–300.
27.
FranklinL-LTernestedtB-MNordenfeltL. Views on dignity of elderly nursing home residents. Nurs Ethics2006; 13(2): 130–146.
28.
BaillieL. Patient dignity in an acute hospital setting: a case study. Int J Nurs Stud2009; 46: 23–37.
29.
BrinkPJ. Exploratory designs. In: BrinkPJWoodMJ (eds) Advanced design in nursing research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998, pp. 308–334.
30.
LindholmLNieminenALMäkeläCClinical application research: a hermeneutical approach to the appropriation of caring science. Qual Health Res2006; 16(1): 137–150.
31.
GadamerH-G. Truth and method. New York: Continuum Publishing Company, 1999.
32.
LevinasE.Totalitet og Uendelighed [Totality and infinity]. København: Hans Reizels Forlag A/S, 1996(Original title: Totalité et Infini, 1966. Translated into Danish by Manni Crone).
33.
ArmanMRehnsfeldtALindholmLThe face of suffering among women with breast cancer – being in a field of forces. Cancer Nurs2002; 25: 96–103.
34.
ErikssonK. The suffering human being (trans. OlssonKACIPeterson). Chicago, IL: Nordic Studies Press, 2006.
35.
RundqvistE. Makt som fullmakt. Et vårdvetenskapligt perspektiv[Power as authority. A caring science perspective]. Doctoral Thesis, Åbo Akademi University Press, Finland, 2004.
36.
FossB. Ledelse – en bevegelse i ansvar og kjærlighet[Responsible leadership – a movement in responsibility and love]. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Caring Science, Åbo Akademi University, Finland, 2012.
37.
RehnsfeldtAErikssonK. The progression of suffering implies alleviated suffering. Scand J Caring Sci2004; 18: 264–272.
38.
KempP.Levinas. En introduction[Levinas. An introduction] (trans. RHedenblad). Gothenburg: Daidalos, 1992(in Swedish).
39.
ErikssonK. Caring science in a new key. Nurs Sci Q2002; 15(1): 61–65.
40.
GallagherASeedhouseD. Dignity in care: the views of patients and relatives. Nurs Times2002; 98(43): 38–40.
41.
LillestøB. Violation in caring for the physically disabled. West J Nurs Res1997; 19(3): 282–296.
42.
LohneVAasgaardTCaspariSThe lonely battle for dignity: individuals struggling with multiple sclerosis. Nurs Ethics2010; 17(3): 301–311.
43.
McCormackBMcCanceTV. Development of a framework for person-centered nursing. J Adv Nurs2006; 56(5): 472–479.
44.
NådenDSæterenB. Cancer patients’ perception of being or not being confirmed. Nurs Ethics2006; 13(3): 222–235.
45.
NådenDSæterenB. To witness the patient’s call: nurses’ perceptions of the phenomenon of confirmation in cancer context. Int J Human Caring2009; 13(3): 47–55.
46.
JacelonCS. Attitudes and behaviours of hospital staff toward elders in an acute care setting. Appl Nurs Res2002; 15(4): 227–234.
47.
BaillieLFordPGallagherANurses’ views on dignity in care. Nurs Older People2009; 21(8): 22–29.
48.
BaillieLGallagherA. Respecting dignity in diverse care settings: strategies of UK nurses. Int J Nurs Pract2011; 17: 336–341.
49.
StabellANådenD. Patients’ dignity in a rehabilitation ward: ethical challenges for the nursing staff. Nurs Ethics2006; 13(3): 236–248.
50.
FordPHaywardMBaillieLSticking to our principles. Emerg Nurs2008; 16(4): 4–5.
51.
NådenDErikssonK. Understanding the importance of values and moral attitudes in nursing care in preserving human dignity. Nurs Sci Q2004; 17(1): 86–91.
52.
FordPBaillieLGallagherAEverything we do. Nurs Manag2008; 15(4): 7.
