Attitudes of prehospital emergency care professionals toward refusal of treatment

Abstract

Introduction:

Prehospital emergency medicine is a specific field of emergency medicine. The basic approach of prehospital emergency medicine is to provide patients with medical intervention at the scene of the incident. This special environment causes health professionals to encounter various problems. One of the most important problems in this field is ethics, in particular questions involving refusal of treatment and the processes associated with it.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to identify emergency health professionals’ views regarding refusal of treatment.

Methods:

This study was conducted with 356 health professionals who were on active duty in prehospital emergency health services. The data were collected through a form which included 10 statements. The participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the statements given by rating them between 0 and 10.

Ethical considerations:

Before conducting the research, permission was received from the local ethics committee. Participants were given written information about the purpose of the study. Participants were assured that their participation was voluntary.

Results:

The healthcare professionals with fewer years of experience in the profession and female participants adopted an attitude of giving priority to providing care. Young participants, in general, respected patient autonomy. However, paradoxically, when it comes to emergency medical cases, they expressed an opinion closer to paternalism.

Conclusions:

This study has found that prehospital emergency health professionals generally respect the patient’s right to refuse treatment; however, they do not prioritize this right when there is a life-threatening situation or when the person does not have decision-making capacity. In these cases, prehospital emergency health professionals tended to adopt a more paternalistic approach.

Keywords

Autonomy decision-making paternalism prehospital emergency medicine refusal of treatment right to refuse treatment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sandman

Nordmark

. Ethical conflicts in prehospital emergency care. Nurs Ethics 2006; 13: 592–607.

Erbay

Alan

Kadıoğlu

. A case study from the perspective of medical ethics: refusal of treatment in an ambulance. J Med Ethics 2010; 36: 652–655.

Stark

Hedges

Neely

. Patients who initially refuse prehospital evaluation and/or therapy. Am J Emerg Med 1990; 8: 509–511.

Shaw

Dyas

Middlemass

. Are they really refusing to travel? A qualitative study of prehospital records. BMC Emerg Med 2006; 6: 8–14.

Adams

Arnold

Siminoff

. Ethical conflicts in the prehospital setting. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21: 1259–1265.

French

Casali

. Ethics in emergency medical services—who cares? An exploratory analysis from Australia. Electron J Bus Ethics Organ Stud 2008; 13(2), http://ejbo.jyu.fi/pdf/ejbo_vol13_no2_pages_44-53.pdf (accessed January 2013).

Steer

. Paramedics, consent and refusal—are we competent? Australasian J Paramed 2007; 5(1): 1–10.

Beauchamp

Childress

. Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.

WHO. A declaration on the promotion of patients’ rights in Europe, Amsterdam, 1994, http://www.who.int/genomics/public/eu_declaration1994.pdf (accessed January 2013).

10.

WMA. Declaration of Lisbon on the rights of the patient, Lisbon, 1981, http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/l4/ (accessed January 2013).

11.

Hurst

Hull

DuVal

. How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis. J Med Ethics 2005; 31: 7–14.

12.

Mogg

Bartlett

. Refusal of treatment in a patient with fluctuating capacity—theory and practice. J Foren Psychiatry Psychol 2005; 16: 60–69.

13.

Magauran

. Risk management for the emergency physician: competency and decision-making capacity, informed consent, and refusal of care against medical advice. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2009; 27: 605–614.

14.

O’Neill

. Some limits of informed consent. J Med Ethics 2003; 29: 4–7.

15.

Hartman

Liang

. Exceptions to informed consent in emergency medicine. Hospital Physician 1999; 53–59.

16.

Moskop

. Informed consent in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1999; 17: 327–340.

17.

Berg

Appelbaum

Lidz

. Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

18.

Hurst

Perrier

Pegoraro

. Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors. J Med Ethics 2007; 33: 51–57.

19.

Çetin

Uçar

Güven

. What do patients expect from their physicians? Qualitative research on the ethical aspects of patient statements. J Med Ethics 2012; 38: 112–116.

20.

Gunnarsson

Stomberg

. Factors influencing decision making among ambulance nurses in emergency care situations. Int Emerg Nurs 2009; 17: 83–89.

21.

Gisondi

Smith-Coggins

Harter

. Assessment of resident professionalism using high-fidelity simulation of ethical dilemmas. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11: 931–937.

22.

Withers

Sklar

Crandall

. Impairment and severity: how ED physicians decide to override an impaired patient’s refusal. Am J Emerg Med 2008; 26: 803–807.

23.

Waldron

Finalle

Tsang

. Effects of gender on prehospital refusal of medical aid. J Emerg Med 2012; 43: 283–290.

24.

McMahon-Parkers

. Rationality, religion and refusal of treatment in an ambulance revisited. J Med Ethics 2013; 39: 587–590.

25.

Marco

Schears

. Prehospital resuscitation practices: a survey of prehospital providers. J Emerg Med 2003; 24: 101–106.