Theoretical debates about the nature of grief and bereavement draw attention to the sensitivity of carrying out research with bereaved people, the possible threats that this may pose and the ethical considerations required to ameliorate potentially damaging outcomes. The authors of this article present a framework for ethical decision-making that has been successfully developed in the context of research with bereaved families. The discussion focuses on application and evaluation of the framework during research with family members who were approached about the donation of a deceased relative’s organs and/or tissues for transplantation. Practical strategies of relevance to the processes of participant recruitment, the interview encounter and follow-up care in the post-interview period are identified and discussed. Concerns about the possible impact of bereavement research are balanced with the views of family members who gave credence to the therapeutic and cathartic benefits of participating in sensitive, death-related research.
CookAS. Ethical issues in bereavement research: an overview. Death Stud1995; 19: 103–122.
2.
ParkesCM. Guidelines for conducting ethical bereavement research. Death Stud1995; 19: 171–181.
3.
RosenblattPC. Ethics of qualitative interviewing with grieving families. Death Stud1995; 19: 139–155.
4.
SteevesRKahnDRopkaME. Ethical considerations in research with bereaved families. Fam Community Health2001; 23: 75–83.
5.
LeeRMRenzettiCM. The problems of researching sensitive topics: an overview and introduction. In: RenzettiCMLeeRM (eds) Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993, pp. 3–12.
6.
CowlesKV. Issues in qualitative research on sensitive topics. West J Nurs Res1988; 10: 163–179.
7.
GibsonV. The problems of researching sensitive topics in health care. Nurse Res1996; 4: 65–74.
HunnA. Gaining access to the research site. In: GerrishKLaceyA (eds) The research process in nursing. 5th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006, pp. 138–154.
16.
ShawSBarrettG. Research governance: regulating risk and reducing harm?J R Soc Med2006; 99: 14–19.
17.
GyselsMShipmanCHigginsonIJ. Is the qualitative research interview an acceptable medium for research with palliative care patients and carers?BMC Med Ethics; 9: 7, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/9/7(2008, accessed 30 September 2013).
18.
CrowtherJLLloyd-WilliamsM. Researching sensitive and emotive topics: the participants’ voice. Res Ethics2012; 8: 200–211.
19.
FleschR. A guide to interviewing the bereaved. J Thanatol1975; 3: 93–103.
20.
RunesonBBeskowJ. Reactions of survivors of suicide victims to interviews. Acta Psychiatr Scand1991; 83: 169–173.
21.
CookASBosleyG. The experience of participating in bereavement research: stressful or therapeutic?Death Stud1995; 19: 157–170.
22.
RichesGDawsonP. Making stories and taking stories: methodological reflections on researching grief and marital tension following the death of a child. Br J Guid Counc1996; 24: 357–365.
23.
SqueM. Researching the bereaved: an investigators experience. Nurs Ethics2000; 7: 23–34.
24.
DyregrovK. Bereaved parents’ experience of research participation. Soc Sci Med2004; 58: 391–400.
25.
SqueMPayneSA. Dissonant Loss: the experiences of donor relatives. Soc Sci Med1996; 43: 1359–1370.
26.
SqueMLongTPayneS. Organ and tissue donation: exploring the needs of families. Report, British Organ Donor Society, Cambridge, February 2003.
27.
SqueMLongTPayneS. From understanding to implementation: meeting the needs of families and individuals affected by post-mortem organ retention. Report, Department of Health with the Retained Organs Commission, Southampton, April 2004.
28.
SqueMLongTPayneS. Exploring the end of life decision-making and hospital experiences of families who did not donate organs or tissues for transplant operations. Report, UK Transplant, Southampton, February 2006.
29.
SqueMLong-SutehallTMorganM. Bereaved families’ experiences of organ and tissue donation, and perceived influences on their decision making. Report, Department of Health, London, June 2013.
