Strategies for handling ethical problems in end of life care: obstacles and possibilities

Abstract

Background:

In end of life care, ethical problems often come to the fore. Little research is performed on ways or strategies for handling those problems and even less on obstacles to and possibilities of using such strategies. A previous study illuminated stroke team members’ experiences of ethical problems and how the teams managed the situation when caring for patients faced with sudden and unexpected death from stroke. These findings have been further explored in this study.

Objective:

The aim of the study was to illuminate obstacles and possibilities perceived by stroke team members in using strategies for handling ethical problems when caring for patients afflicted by sudden and unexpected death caused by stroke.

Research design:

A qualitative method with combined deductive and inductive content analysis was utilized.

Participants and research context:

Data were collected through individual interviews with 15 stroke team members working in stroke units of two associated county hospitals in western Sweden.

Ethical considerations:

The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board, Gothenburg, Sweden. Permission was also obtained from the director of each stroke unit.

Findings:

All the studied strategies for handling of ethical problems were found to have both obstacles and possibilities. Uncertainty is shown as a major obstacle and unanimity as a possibility in the use of the strategies. The findings also illuminate the value of the concept “the patient’s best interests” as a starting point for the carers’ ethical reasoning.

Conclusion:

The concept “the patient’s best interests” used as a starting point for ethical reasoning among the carers is not explicitly defined yet, which might make this value difficult to use both as a universal concept and as an argument for decisions. Carers therefore need to strengthen their argumentation and reflect on and use ethically grounded arguments and defined ethical values like dignity in their clinical work and decisions.

Keywords

Content analysis ethical problems obstacles possibilities strategies stroke team members

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Riks-Stroke. Årsrapport. Rapport från Riks-Stroke 2012 [Annual Report. Report from the Swedish Stroke Register 2012]. Riks-Stroke [Swedish Stroke Register], 2013, 114 pp., http://www.riks-stroke.org/content/analyser/Riks-Strokes_Arsrapport%202012.pdf

Eurostat. Health statistics: atlas on mortality in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2009.

Mozaffarian

Roger

. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 1: 143–152.

Kjellström

Norrving

Shatchkute

. Helsingborg Declaration 2006 on European stroke strategies. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 23: 231–241.

Socialstyrelsen. Strokesjukvård. Vetenskapligt underlag för nationella riktlinjer 2009 [Stroke hospital care. Scientific basis for national guidelines 2009]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen [National Board of Health and Welfare], 2009, 207 pp.

Rejnö

Danielson

von Post

. The unexpected force of acute stroke leading to patients’ sudden death as described by nurses. Scand J Caring Sci 2013; 27: 123–130.

Rogers

Addington-Hall

. Focus: care of the dying stroke patient in the acute setting. J Res Nurs 2005; 10: 153–167.

Terént

Asplund

Farahmand

. Stroke unit care revisited: who benefits the most? A cohort study of 105,043 patients in Riks-Stroke, the Swedish Stroke Register. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 881–887.

Saposnik

Kapral

Coutts

. Do all age groups benefit from organized inpatient stroke care? Stroke 2009; 40: 3321–3327.

10.

Toscani

Di Giulio

Brunelli

. How people die in hospital general wards: a descriptive study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005; 30: 33–40.

11.

Burton

Haley

Small

. Bereavement after caregiving or unexpected death: effects on elderly spouses. Aging Ment Health 2006; 10: 319–326.

12.

Fridh

Forsberg

Bergbom

. Doing one’s utmost: nurses’ descriptions of caring for dying patients in an intensive care environment. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2009; 25: 233–241.

13.

Lloyd-Williams

Morton

Peters

. The end-of-life care experiences of relatives of brain dead intensive care patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009; 37: 659–664.

14.

Good

Gadmer

Ruopp

. Narrative nuances on good and bad deaths: internists’ tales from high-technology work places. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 939–953.

15.

Kim

Lee

. Korean nurses’ attitudes to good and bad death, life-sustaining treatment and advance directives. Nurs Ethics 2003; 10: 624–637.

16.

Brysiewicz

. Violent death and the South African emergency nurse. Int J Nurs Stud 2002; 39: 253–258.

17.

Childress

. Ethics at the end of life. Home Health Care Manag Pract 2008; 20: 414–417.

18.

McLennon

Uhrich

Lasiter

. Oncology nurses’ narratives about ethical dilemmas and prognosis-related communication in advanced cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 2013; 36: 114–121.

19.

McGrath

Holewa

. Ethical decision making in an acute medical ward: Australian findings on dealing with conflict and tension. Ethics & Behav 2006; 16: 233–252.

20.

Rejnö

. Bråd dōd nār patienten drabbats av stroke: vårdares och nārståendes upplevelser [Unexpected sudden death when the patient is affected by stroke – experiences of the carers and next of kin]. PhD Thesis, Institutionen för vårdvetenskap och hälsa Sahlgrenska Akademin. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet, 2012, p. 120.

21.

Rejnö

Berg

Danielson

. Ethical problems: in the face of sudden and unexpected death. Nurs Ethics 2012; 19: 642–653.

22.

Rejnö

Danielson

Berg

Strategies for handling ethical problems in sudden and unexpected death. Nurs Ethics 2013; 20: 708–722.

23.

Doane

Storch

Pauly

. Ethical nursing practice: inquiry-in-action. Nurs Inq 2009; 16: 232–240.

24.

Goethals

Gastmans

de Casterlé

. Nurses’ ethical reasoning and behaviour: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2010; 47: 635–650.

25.

World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, 2008, http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf

26.

Krippendorff

. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.

27.

Elo

Kyngäs

. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62: 107–115.

28.

Kothari

Kirschner

. Abandoning the Golden Rule: the problem with “putting ourselves in the patient’s place.” Top Stroke Rehabil 2006; 13: 68–73.

29.

Winter

Parks

. Family discord and proxy decision makers’ end-of-life treatment decisions. J Palliat Med 2008; 11: 1109–1114.

30.

Barrio-Cantalejo

Molina-Ruiz

Simón-Lorda

. Advance directives and proxies’ predictions about patients’ treatment preferences. Nurs Ethics 2009; 16: 93–109.

31.

Creutzfeldt

Holloway

. Treatment decisions after severe stroke: uncertainty and biases. Stroke 2012; 43: 3405–3408.

32.

Friend

. Ethical decision making in the emergency department: the Golden Rule. J Emerg Nurs 2012; 38: 251–253.

33.

Edlund

Lindwall

von Post

. Concept determination of human dignity. Nurs Ethics 2013; 20: 851–860.

34.

Winter

Parks

Diamond

. Ask a different question, get a different answer: why living wills are poor guides to care preferences at the end of life. J Palliat Med 2010; 13: 567–572.

35.

Patton

. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London: Sage, 2002.

36.

Lincoln

Guba

. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985, 416 pp.