Background: The nature of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the far-reaching unpleasant consequences of this disease and the treatments can put the dignity of the women with the disease at risk. Yet, the dignity of this population of patients has not been the subject of much research.
Objective: The present study aims to define and describe the concept of dignity of women with SLE.
Research design: This is a qualitative descriptive study in which data were collected via individual, in-depth, semi-structured interviews. The collected data were analyzed using methods of content analysis in MAXQDA 2010.
Participants and research context: In total, 29 individuals (14 patients, 8 family caregivers, and 7 nurses) were selected by purposeful sampling from the internal wards of a teaching hospital located in the south of Iran. The study was conducted between June 2023 and February 2024. Sampling continued until the data were saturated.
Ethical considerations: The Institutional Review Board of the university has verified that the study complies with research ethics.
Findings: Analysis of the data extracted from the interviews resulted in three themes: respect for identity, compassion in care and treatment, and fulfillment of support needs.
Conclusions: The women with SLE who were surveyed in the present study needed to have their feminine identity and social identity respected and be comprehensively supported by their treatment team and family caregivers. In such a context, care characterized by compassion and empathy and treatment teams’ respectful and professional interactions with the patients contribute to maintaining the patients’ dignity. Nursing managers and staff can use the findings of the present study to create a supportive clinical environment in order to better maintain the dignity of women with SLE.
Kandane-RathnayakeRLouthrenooWHoiA, et al.‘Not at target’: prevalence and consequences of inadequate disease control in systemic lupus erythematosus—a multinational observational cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther2022; 24: 1–10. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02756-3.
2.
HinkleJLCheeverKH. Brunner and Suddarth’s textbook of medical-surgical nursing. Chennai, TN: Wolters kluwer india Pvt Ltd, 2018.
3.
SullivanSL. Development of a systemic lupus erythematosus knowledge questionnaire: the relationship among disease proximity, educational exposure, and knowledge. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2016. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1312
4.
SloanMBosleyMBlaneM, et al.But you don’t look sick’: a qualitative analysis of the LUPUS UK online forum. Rheumatol Int2021; 41: 721–732. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-020-04726-x.
5.
SquanceMLReevesGEBridgmanH. The lived experience of lupus flares: features, triggers, and management in an Australian female cohort. Int J Chronic Dis2014; 2014: 816729. DOI: 10.1155/2014/816729.
6.
FranklynKHoiANikpourM, et al.The need to define treatment goals for systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol2014; 10: 567–571. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.118.
7.
BoothSPriceEWalkerE. Fluctuation, invisibility, fatigue–the barriers to maintaining employment with systemic lupus erythematosus: results of an online survey. Lupus2018; 27: 2284–2291. DOI: 10.1177/0961203318808593.
8.
LateefAPetriM. Unmet medical needs in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther2012; 14: S4–S9. DOI: 10.1186/ar3919.
9.
SloanMNaughtonFHarwoodR, et al.Is it me? The impact of patient–physician interactions on lupus patients’ psychological well-being, cognition and health-care-seeking behaviour. Rheumatol Adv Pract2020; 4(2): rkaa037. DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkaa037.
10.
MorganCBlandAMakerC, et al.Individuals living with lupus: findings from the LUPUS UK members survey 2014. Lupus2018; 27(4): 681–687. DOI: 10.1177/0961203317749746.
11.
CojocaruMCojocaruIMSilosiI, et al.Manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Maedica (Bucur)2011; 6(4): 330–336.
12.
LiQ-ZKarpDRQuanJ, et al.Risk factors for ANA positivity in healthy persons. Arthritis Res Ther2011; 13(2): R38. DOI: 10.1186/ar3271.
13.
SloanMHarwoodRSuttonS, et al.Medically explained symptoms: a mixed methods study of diagnostic, symptom and support experiences of patients with lupus and related systemic autoimmune diseases. Rheumatol Adv Pract2020; 4(1): rkaa006. DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkaa006.
14.
HedbergCLynøeN. What is meant by patient-centredness being value-based?Scand J Prim Health Care2013; 31(4): 188–189. DOI: 10.3109/02813432.2013.848543.
15.
Coronado-VázquezVCanet-FajasCRamírez-DuránMV, et al.Nursing care ethical implications regarding chronic patients at hospital discharge. Healthcare2020; 8(2): 167. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8020167.
16.
BidabadiFSYazdannikAZargham-BoroujeniA. Patient’s dignity in intensive care unit: a critical ethnography. Nurs Ethics2019; 26(3): 738–752. DOI: 10.1177/0969733017720826.
17.
KadivarMMardani-HamoolehMKouhnavardM. Concept analysis of human dignity in patient care: rodgers' evolutionary approach. J Med Ethics Hist Med2018; 11: 4.
18.
LinY-PWatsonRTsaiY-F. Dignity in care in the clinical setting: a narrative review. Nurs Ethics2013; 20(2): 168–177. DOI: 10.1177/0969733012458609.
19.
TehranineshatBRakhshanMTorabizadehC, et al.The dignity of burn patients: a qualitative descriptive study of nurses, family caregivers, and patients. BMC Nurs2021; 20(1): 205. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-021-00725-w.
20.
TehranineshatBRakhshanMTorabizadehC, et al.Patient dignity in Iranian clinical care settings as perceived by physicians, caregivers, and patients. J Multidiscip Healthc2020; 13: 923–933. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S258962.
ŠaňákováŠČápJ. Dignity from the nurses’ and older patients’ perspective: a qualitative literature review. Nurs Ethics2019; 26(5): 1292–1309. DOI: 10.1177/0969733017747960.
24.
BagheriHYaghmaeiFAshktorabT, et al.Patient dignity and its related factors in heart failure patients. Nurs Ethics2012; 19(3): 316–327. DOI: 10.1177/0969733011425970.
25.
DrenkardCTheisKADaughertyTT, et al.Depression, stigma and social isolation: the psychosocial trifecta of primary chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, a cross-sectional and path analysis. Lupus Sci Med2022; 9(1): e000697. DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000697.
26.
Oosterveld-VlugMGPasmanHRWvan GennipIE, et al.Nursing home staff’s views on residents’ dignity: a qualitative interview study. BMC Health Serv Res2013; 13(13): 353. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-353.
27.
HosseiniFAMomennasabMYektatalabS, et al.Patients’ perception of dignity in Iranian general hospital settings. Nurs Ethics2019; 26(6): 1777–1790. DOI: 10.1177/0969733018772078.
28.
MohammadiFTabatabaeiHSMozafariF, et al.Caregivers’ perception of women’s dignity in the delivery room: a qualitative study. Nurs Ethics2020; 27(1): 116–126. DOI: 10.1177/0969733019834975.
29.
BagherianSSharifFZarshenasL, et al.Cancer patients’ perspectives on dignity in care. Nurs Ethics2020; 27(1): 127–140. DOI: 10.1177/0969733019845126.
30.
ŽiakováKČápJMiertováM, et al.An interpretative phenomenological analysis of dignity in people with multiple sclerosis. Nurs Ethics2020; 27(3): 686–700. DOI: 10.1177/0969733019897766.
31.
BagheriA. Elements of human dignity in healthcare settings: the importance of the patient's perspective. J Med Ethics2012; 38(12): 729–730. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100743.
32.
TehranineshatBTorabizadehC. Dignity of nursing students in clinical learning environments. Nurs Ethics2022; 29(3): 742–757. DOI: 10.1177/09697330211041735.
33.
GilgunJF. Qualitative methods and the development of clinical assessment tools. Qual Health Res2004; 14(7): 1008–1019. DOI: 10.1177/1049732304266819.
34.
BradshawCAtkinsonSDoodyO. Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Glob Qual Nurs Res2017; 4(4): 2333393617742282. DOI: 10.1177/2333393617742282.
35.
KimHSefcikJSBradwayC. Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: a systematic review. Res Nurs Health2017; 40(1): 23–42. DOI: 10.1002/nur.21768.
36.
DoyleLMcCabeCKeoghB, et al.An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. J Res Nurs2020; 25(5): 443–455. DOI: 10.1177/1744987119880234.
37.
ParreiraPSantos-CostaPNeriM, et al.Work methods for nursing care delivery. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2021; 18(4): 2088. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18042088.
SpezialeHSStreubertHJCarpenterDR. Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2011.
40.
GraneheimUHLundmanB. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today2004; 24(2): 105–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
41.
TehranineshatBYektatalabSMomennasabM, et al.The experiences of multiple sclerosis patients’ family caregivers at the first hospitalization of their patients: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence2020; 14: 1159–1172. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S257746.
42.
LincolnYSGubaEG. Naturalist inquiry. In: Naturalist inquiry newbury. Park, CA: Sage, 1985, pp. 289–1985.
43.
FuseiniAGLeyLRawsonH, et al.A systematic review of patient‐reported dignity and dignified care during acute hospital admission. J Adv Nurs2022; 78(11): 3540–3558. DOI: 10.1111/jan.15370.
44.
FuseiniAGRawsonHLeyL, et al.Patient dignity and dignified care: a qualitative description of hospitalised older adults perspectives. J Clin Nurs2023; 32(7-8): 1286–1302. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16286.
45.
FerriPMuzzalupoJDi LorenzoR. Patients’ perception of dignity in an Italian general hospital: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Health Serv Res2015; 15(15): 41. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0704-8.
46.
MoghadamZBFaeziSTZareianA, et al.Experiences of Iranian female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a qualitative study. Arch Rheumatol2020; 36(1): 120–128. DOI: 10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2021.7989.
47.
MaWZhanZLiangX, et al.Subclinical impairment of ovarian reserve in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with normal menstruation not using alkylating therapy. J Womens Health2013; 22(12): 1023–1027. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4255.
48.
CarpHJSelmiCShoenfeldY. The autoimmune bases of infertility and pregnancy loss. J Autoimmun2012; 38(2-3): J266–J274. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2011.11.016.
49.
GallopKNixonASwinburnP, et al.Development of a conceptual model of health-related quality of life for systemic lupus erythematosus from the patient's perspective. Lupus2012; 21(9): 934–943. DOI: 10.1177/0961203312441980.
50.
BeckermanNL. Living with lupus: a qualitative report. Soc Work Health Care2011; 50(4): 330–343. DOI: 10.1080/00981389.2011.554302.
51.
TaïebOBricouOBaubetT, et al.Patients’ beliefs about the causes of systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology2010; 49(3): 592–599. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep430.
52.
SutantoBSingh‐GrewalDMcNeilHP, et al.Experiences and perspectives of adults living with systemic lupus erythematosus: thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Arthritis Care Res2013; 65(11): 1752–1765. DOI: 10.1002/acr.22032.
53.
PhutiASchneiderMMakanK, et al.Living with systemic lupus erythematosus in South Africa: a bitter pill to swallow. Health Qual Life Outcome2019; 17(1): 65. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1132-y.
54.
PooleJLRymek-GmytrasiewiczMMendelsonC, et al.Parenting: the forgotten role of women living with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol2012; 31(6): 995–1000. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-011-1929-5.
55.
GallagherALiSWainwrightP, et al.Dignity in the care of older people – a review of the theoretical and empirical literature. BMC Nurs2008; 7: 11. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6955-7-11.
56.
Stephen EkpenyongMNyashanuMOssey-NwezeC, et al.Exploring the perceptions of dignity among patients and nurses in hospital and community settings: an integrative review. J Res Nurs2021; 26(6): 517–537. DOI: 10.1177/1744987121997890.
57.
MoenEKNådenD. Intensive care patients’ perceptions of how their dignity is maintained: a phenomenological study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs2015; 31(5): 285–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2015.03.003.
58.
HallSDoddRHHigginsonIJ. Maintaining dignity for residents of care homes: a qualitative study of the views of care home staff, community nurses, residents and their families. Geriatr Nurs2014; 35(1): 55–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2013.10.012.
59.
Tauber‐GilmoreMAddisGZahranZ, et al.The views of older people and health professionals about dignity in acute hospital care. J Clin Nurs2018; 27(1-2): 223–234. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13877.
60.
SharifFKhoshnoodZEckertM, et al.Dignity of Iranian women with breast cancer: a qualitative study. JQRS2023; 12(2): 91–99. DOI: 10.34172/jqr.2023.14.
61.
RutterSKiemleG. Exploring the social and interpersonal experiences of south asian women with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Psychol Health2015; 30(3): 318–335. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2014.972397.
62.
ÖzelFArgonG. The effects of fatigue and pain on daily life activities in systemic lupus erythematosus. Agri2015; 27(4): 181–191. DOI: 10.5505/agri.2015.38278.
63.
BramhallE. Effective communication skills in nursing practice. Nurs Stand2014; 29(14): 53–59. DOI: 10.7748/ns.29.14.53.e9355.
