Client Age,Gender,Behaviour: Effects On Quality of Predicted Self-Reactions and Colleague Reactions

Abstract

This comparative study shows biases relative to client age, gender and behaviour demon strated by 268 female nurse subjects. A repeated measures design was utilized. All three main effects were significant (p < 0.001) for how respondents predicted that they would react to various clients and also how they predicted that their colleagues would react. Most two-way and three-way interaction effects were significant. Subjects demonstrated more favourable reactions to nice, young, male clients and least favourable reactions to not nice, old, male clients.

Study subjects predicted more favourable self-reactions to simulated clients than for their colleagues. What should be important to every professional as a result of this study is the need to be aware of self-biases, which may cause errors in decision-making and nursing care interventions and lead to ethical violations with clients.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Greipp M. Greipp's model of ethical decision making. J Adv Nurs 1992; 17: 734-38.

Greipp M. Culture and ethics: a tool for analysing the effects of biases on the nurse-client relationship. Nurs Ethics 1995; 2: 211-21.

Greipp M. Undermedication for pain: an ethical model. Adv Nurs Sci 1992; 15: 44-53.

Griepp M. An ethical model for pain management practitioners. Am J Pain Manage 1993; 3: 125-30.

Burns J. , Hodsman T. , McLintock G. , Gillies G. , Kenny G. , McArdle C. The influence of patient characteristics on the requirements for post operative analgesia. Anesthesia 1989; 44: 2-6.

Calderone K. The influence of gender on the frequency of pain and sedative medication administration to postoperative patients. Sex Roles 1990; 23: 713-25.

McDonald DD , Bridge RG Gender stereotyping and nursing care. Res Nurs Health 1991; 14: 373-78.

Hawthorne MH Gender differences in recovery after coronary artery surgery. Image 1994; 26(1): 75-80.

Romeo KC , Saccucci M. Ethnic and gender differences in cardiac rehabilitaiton. J Cardiopulmonary Rehabil 1991; 11: 214-20.

10.

Wingate S. Women and coronary heart disease: implications for the critical care setting . Focus Crit Care 1991; 18: 212-20.

11.

Goebel BL Age stereotypes held by student nurses. J Psychol 1984; 116: 249-54.

12.

Brower T. Do nurses stereotype the aged? J Gerontol Nurs 1985; 11: 17-28.

13.

Newcomb PA , Carbone PP Cancer treatment and age: patient perspectives. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 1580-84.

14.

Lane B. , Rae D. The prejudice of language: effects of word choice on impressions formed by nurses. Nurs Papers 1983; 15: 21-33.

15.

Damrosch S. More than skin deep: relationship between perceived physical attractiveness and nursing students' assessments. West J Nurs Res 1982; 4: 423-33.

16.

Bordieri J. , Soldoky M. , Mikos N. Physical attractiveness and nurses' perceptions of pediatric patients. Nurs Res 1984; 34: 24-26.

17.

Klein D. , Najman J. , Kohrman A. , Munro C. Patient characteristics that elicit negative responses from family physicians . J Fam Pract 1982; 14: 881-88.

18.

Markus H. , Zajonc R. The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In: Lindzey G , Aronson E eds. Handbook of social psychology, third edition. New York : Random House, 1985: 137-214.

19.

Sherwood G. Self-serving biases in person perception: a reexamination of projection as a mechanism of defense. Psychol Bull 1981; 90: 445-59.

20.

Fiske S. , Taylor S. Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1984; 82.

21.

Ross L. , Greene D. , House P. The 'false consensus effect': an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J Exp Soc Psychol 1977 ; 13: 279-301.

22.

Kassin SM , Baron RM Basic determinants of attribution and social perception. In: Harvey JH , Weary G eds. Attribution: basic issues and applications. New York: Academic Press, 1985: 37-64.