The purpose of this article is to describe and reflect ethical challenges in a grounded theory study on the dynamics of hope in HIV-positive adults and their significant others. It concentrates on the justification of a research problem, sensitive research and the relationship between the researcher and the participants in data collection. The basis of ethically sound nursing research on the dynamics of hope in these two vulnerable groups lies in the relationship between the researcher and the participant. However, it is also obvious that the content, the process, the methods used and the ethics of the study cannot be divorced from this relationship. In conducting grounded theory research on the dynamics of hope in this research population, the researcher has to consider the surrounding world, that is, the reality in which these people live in hope or despair.
Watson AB.Informed consent of special subjects . Nurs Res1982; 31: 43-47 .
2.
Mocroft A , Johnson MA , Phillips AN.Factors affecting survival in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome . AIDS1996; 10: 1057-1065 .
3.
Selwyn PA.HIV therapy in the real world . AIDS1996; 10: 1591-1593 .
4.
National Public Health Institute , Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology . HIV/AIDS situation in Finland. Helsinki: NPHI , 1998.
5.
Lähdevirta J, Leinikki P. AIDS eli immuunikato. In: Eskola J, Huovinen P, Valtonen V eds. Infektiotaudit. Kustannus Oy Duodecim. Jyväskylä: Gummerus, 1996: 455-64.
6.
Gray CM , Schaprio JM , Winters MA , Merigan TC.Changes in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets in response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV type 1-infected patients with prior protease inhibitor experience . AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses1998; 14: 561-569 .
7.
Aboulafia DM.Regression of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related pulmonary Kaposi’s sarcoma after highly active antiretroviral therapy . Mayo Clin Proc1998; 73: 439-443 .
8.
Lähdevirta J. HIV/AIDS lääkehoidon kehityshistoria. In: Stålström O, Lindblom B, Frazier M eds. AIDS-työn aikakauskirja 1. Helsinki: Suomen AIDS-tukikeskus, 1997: 7-12.
9.
McHaffie HE.HIV and AIDS: the nursing response and some ethical challenges . Nurs Ethics1994; 1: 224-232 .
Manuel C , Enel P , Charrel Jet al.The ethical approach to AIDS: a bibliographical review . J Med Ethics1990; 16: 14-27 .
12.
Bennet L , Duke J.Research note: decision-making processes, ethical dilemmas and models of care in HIV/AIDS health care provision . Sociol Health Illness1995; 17: 109-119 .
13.
Abdellah FG , Levine E.Preparing nursing research for the 21st century. Evolution, methodologies, challenges. New York: Springer Publishing , 1994.
14.
Sherwen LN , Storm DS.Looking toward the twenty-first century; the role of nursing research in care of children and families affected by HIV . Nurs Clin North Am1996; 31: 165-178 .
15.
Twomey JG.Investigating pediatric HIV research ethics in the field . West J Nurs Res1994; 16: 404-413 .
16.
Hutchins SA , Eckes R.HIV infection: clinical research. Considerations for prospective participants . Nurs Clin North Am1996; 31: 125-135 .
Leino-Kilpi H , Tuomaala U.Research ethics and nursing science: an empirical example . J Adv Nurs1989; 14: 451-458 .
19.
Eby MA.Ethical issues in nursing research: the wider picture . Nurse Res1995; 3(1): 5-13 .
20.
Firby P.Critiquing the ethical aspects of a study . Nurs Res1995; 3(1): 35-42 .
21.
Silva MC.Ethical issues: new ANA guidelines for ethics in nursing research . Nurs Connections1996; 9(2): 28-33 .
22.
Young Brockopp D , Hastings-Tolsma MT.Fundamentals of nursing research. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett , 1995.
23.
Weijer C , Dickens B , Meslin EM.Bioethics for clinicians: 10. Research ethics . Can Med Assoc J1997; 156: 1153-1157 .
24.
Demi AS , Warren NA.Issues in conducting research with vulnerable families . West J Nurs Res1995; 17: 188-202 .
25.
Platzer H , James T.Methodological issues conducting sensitive research on lesbian and gay men’s experience of nursing care . J Adv Nurs1997; 25: 626-633 .
26.
Archbold P.Ethical issues in qualitative research. In: Chenitz WC , Swanson JM eds. From practice to grounded theory: qualitative research in nursing. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley , 1986: 154-163.
27.
Robinson CA , Thorne SE.Dilemmas of ethics and validity in qualitative nursing research . Can J Nurs Res1988; 20(1): 65-76 .
28.
Ramos MC.Some ethical implications of qualitative research . Res Nurs Health1989; 12: 57-63 .
29.
Munhall PL.Ethical considerations in qualitative research. In: Munhall PL , Oiler Boyd C eds. Nursing research: a qualitative perspective. New York: National League for Nursing , 1993: 395-408.
30.
Vehviläinen-Julkunen K.Ethical considerations in qualitative nursing research . Vard i Norden1993; 13(2): 23-25 .
31.
Robley LR.The ethics of qualitative nursing research . J Prof Nurs1995; 11: 45-48 .
32.
Holloway I , Wheeler S.Qualitative research for nurses. Oxford: Blackwell Science , 1996.
33.
Cowles KA.Issues in qualitative research in sensitive topics . West J Nurs Res1988; 10: 163-179 .
34.
Raudonis BM.Ethical considerations in qualitative research with hospice patients . Qual Health Res1992; 2: 238-249 .
35.
Hurley P , Pinder G.Ethics, social forces, and politics in AIDS-related research: experience in planning and implementing a household HIV seroprevalence survey . Milbank Q1992; 70: 605-628 .
36.
Kass NE , Taylor HA , King PA.Harms of excluding pregnant women from clincial research: the case of HIV-infected women . J Law Med Ethics1996; 24: 36-46 .
37.
Brody BA.Research ethics: international perspectives . Camb Q Health Ethics1997; 6: 376-384 .
38.
LaRossa R , Bennett L , Gelles R.Ethical dilemmas in qualitative family research . J Marriage Fam1981; 43: 303-312 .
39.
Ringheim K.Ethical issues in social science research with special reference to sexual behaviour research . Soc Sci Med1995; 40: 1691-1697 .
40.
Kylmä J , Vehviläinen-Julkunen K.Hope in nursing research: a meta-analysis of the ontological and epistemological foundations of research on hope . J Adv Nurs1997; 25: 364-371 .
41.
Carson V , Soeken KL , Santy J , Terry L.Hope and spiritual well-being: essentials for living with AIDS . Perspect Psychiatr Care1990; 26: 28-34 .
42.
Hall BA.The struggle of the diagnosed terminally ill person to maintain hope . Nurs Sci Q1990; 3: 177-184 .
43.
Herth K.Hope in the family caregiver of terminally ill people . J Adv Nurs1993; 18: 538-548 .
44.
Hall BA.Ways of maintaining hope in HIV disease . Res Nurs Health1994; 17: 283-293 .
45.
Cutcliffe JR.How do nurses inspire and instill hope in terminally ill HIV patients?J Adv Nurs1995; 22: 888-895 .
46.
Wilde V.Controversial hypotheses on the relationship between researcher and informant in qualitative research . J Adv Nurs1992; 17: 234-242 .
47.
Batchelor JA , Briggs CM.Subject, project or self? Thoughts on ethical dilemmas for social and medical researchers . Soc Sci Med1994; 39: 949-954 .
48.
Carr LT.The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research: what method for nursing?J Adv Nurs1994; 20: 716-721 .
49.
Lindblom B. AIDS-ilmiön tutkimus on Suomessa alkuvaiheessa. In: Stålström O, Lindblom B, Frazier M, eds. AIDS-työn aikakauskirja 1. Helsinki: Suomen AIDS-tukikeskus, 1997: 5-6.
50.
Glaser BG , Strauss AL.The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter , 1967.
51.
Lee RM.Doing research on sensitive issues. London: Sage , 1993.
52.
Lee RM , Renzetti CM.The problems of researching sensitive topics . Am Behav Sci1990; 33: 510-528 .
53.
Hutchinson SA , Wilson ME , Wilson HS.Benefits of participating in research interviews . Image J Nurs School1994; 26: 161-164 .
54.
Gordon RL.Dimensions of depth interviews . Am J Soc1956; 62: 158-164 .
55.
Brannen J.Research note: the study of sensitive subjects . Sociol Rev1988; 36: 552-563 .
56.
Sieber JE.The ethics and politics of sensitive research. In: Renzetti CM , Lee RM eds. Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1993: 14-26.
57.
Martin JL , Dean L.Developing a community sample of gay men for an epidemiological study of AIDS. In: Renzetti CM , Lee RM eds. Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage , 1993: 82-100.
58.
Biernacki P , Waldorf D.Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling . Sociol Meth Res1981; 10: 141-163 .
59.
Sandelowski M.We are the stories we tell: narrative knowing in nursing practice . J Holistic Nurs1994; 12: 23-33 .
60.
Heatherington L , Friedlander ML , Johnson WF.Informed consent in family therapy research: ethical dilemmas and practical problems . J Fam Psychol1989; 2: 373-385 .
61.
Nusbaum JG , Chenitz WC.A grounded theory study of the informed consent process for pharmacologic research . West J Nurs Res1990; 12: 215-228 .
62.
Dowd SB , Wilson B.Informed patient consent: a historical perspective . Radiol Technol1995; 67: 119-124 .
63.
Grimshaw AD.Whose privacy? What harm?Sociol Meth Res1982; 2: 233-247 .
64.
Kavanaugh K , Ayres L.‘Not as bad as it could have been’: assessing and mitigating harm during research interviews on sensitive topics . Res Nurs Health1998; 21: 91-97 .
65.
Carpenter JS.Informing participants about the benefits of descriptive research . Nurs Res1998; 47(1): 63-64 .
66.
Uphold CR , Strickland OL.Issues related to the unit of analysis in family nursing research . West J Nurs Res1989; 11: 405-417 .
67.
Ford JS , Reutter LI.Ethical dilemmas associated with small samples . J Adv Nurs1990; 15: 187-191 .
68.
Davis DS.Rich cases: the ethics of thick description . Hastings Cent Rep1991; 21(4): 12-16 .
