Green spaces, such as parks, are an essential constituent of urban quality of life. It is noteworthy, however, that some cities have been more successful in implementing a green space policy than others. This article aims to assess the complex and heterogeneous supply of urban green spaces by means of a multidimensional evaluation approach, and to compare the `green performance' of European cities in terms of the present situation, priorities in decision making and planning, and their success level as evaluated by experts in the field. The article examines urban green spaces from the viewpoint of relevant indicators, in particular `quantity and availability of urban green spaces', `changes in green spaces', `planning of urban green spaces',`financing of urban green spaces' and `level of performance', on the basis of a comparison of 24 European cities. It deploys a proper type of multi-criteria analysis for mixed quantitative and qualitative information, coined Regime Analysis.A comparison of urban green spaces in European cities by means of this multi-criteria analysis brings to light the critical elements in green space availability and sets out choice directions based on priorities in decision making and policy evaluation.The results of this Regime Analysis show that when only the indicators on the availability of urban green spaces are used to assess the green performance with a view to a ranking of European cities, the Southern European cities are in the lead. However, when the planning performance indicators are also taken into consideration, the Northern European cities appear to have higher scores.
Arrow, K.J. and Raynaud, H. (1986) Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision Making . Cambridge: The MIT Press.
2.
Balram, S. and Dragićević, S. (2005) `Attitudes toward Urban Green Spaces: Integrating Questionnaire Survey and Collaborative GIS Techniques to Improve Attitude Measurements', Landscape and Urban Planning71: 147-62.
3.
Baycan-Levent, T. and Nijkamp, P. (2005a) `Evaluation of Urban Green Spaces', in D. Miller and D. Patassini (eds) Beyond Benefit Cost Analysis: Accounting for Non-market Values in Planning Evaluation, pp. 63-87. Aldershot: Ashgate.
4.
Baycan-Levent, T. and Nijkamp, P. (2005b) `Urban Green Space Policies: a Comparative Study on Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities', Research Paper, Department of Regional Economics, Free University, Amsterdam.
5.
Baycan-Levent, T., van Leeuwen, E., Rodenburg, C. and Nijkamp, P. (2003) `Development and Management of Green Spaces in European Cities: a Comparative Analysis', in E. Beriatos and J. Colman (eds) The Pulsar Effect in Urban Planning, pp. 237-47. Volos, Greece: ISOCARP Congress Publications and University of Thessaly Press.
6.
Brandon, P.S. and Lombardi, P. (2005) Evaluation of the Sustainable Development in the Built Environment. Oxford: Blackwell .
7.
Breuste, J., Feldman, H. and Uhlmann, O. (eds) ( 1998) Urban Ecology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8.
Cackowski, J.M. and Nasar, J.L. (2003) `The Restorative Effects of Roadside Vegetation: Implications for Automobile Driver Anger and Frustration', Environment and Behaviour35 (6): 736-51.
9.
Chiesura, A. (2004) `The Role of Urban Parks for the Sustainable City' , Landscape and Urban Planning68: 129-38.
10.
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Laskin, R., Sutton, P. and van den Belt, M. (1997) `The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital', Nature387 (15): 253-60.
11.
de Groot, R.S. (1994) `Environmental Functions and the Economic Value of Natural Ecosystems', in A.M. Jansson, M. Hammer, C. Folke and R. Constanza (eds) Investing in Natural Capital: the Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability, pp. 151-68. Washington, DC: Island Press.
12.
De Sousa, C.A. (2003) `Turning Brownfields into Green Space in the City of Toronto', Landscape and Urban Planning62: 181-98.
13.
Dole, J. (1989) `Greenscape 5: Green Cities', Architects' Journal (10 May): 61-9.
14.
Dtlr (2001) Green Spaces, Better Places: Interim Report of the Urban Green Spaces Taskforce. London: Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions.
15.
Goode, D. (1998) `Integration of Nature in Urban Development', in J. Breuste, H. Feldman and O. Uhlmann (eds) Urban Ecology, pp. 589-92. Berlin: Springer-Verlag .
16.
Hart, R. (1997) Children's Participation: the Theory and Practice of Involving Young Citizens in Community Development and Environmental Care . London: Earthscan Publications .
17.
Hartig, T., Mang, M. and Evans, G.W. (1991) `Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences' , Environment and Behaviour23 (1): 3-26.
18.
Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P. and Rietveld, P. (1983) `Qualitative Discrete Multiple Criteria Choice Models', Regional Planning, Regional Science and Urban Economics13: 77-102.
19.
Hough, M. (1984) City Form and Natural Processes. London: Croom Helm.
20.
Janssen, R. and Munda, G. (1999) `Multi-criteria Methods for Quantitative, Qualitative and Fuzzy Evaluation Problems', in J.C.J.M. van den Bergh (ed.) Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, pp. 837-52. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.
21.
Kaplan, R. (2001) `The Nature of the View from Home: Psychological Benefits', Environment and Behaviour33 (4): 507-42.
22.
Korpela, K.M., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F.G. and Fuhrer, U. (2001) `Restorative Experience and Self-regulation in Favorite Places', Environment and Behaviour33 (4): 572-89.
23.
Kuo, F.E. and Sullivan, W.C. (2001a) `Environment and Crime in the Inner City: Does Vegetation Reduce Crime?', Environment and Behaviour33 (3): 343-67.
24.
Kuo, F.E. and Sullivan, W.C. (2001b) `Aggression and Violence in the Inner City: Effects of Environment via Mental Fatigue', Environment and Behaviour33 (4): 543-71.
25.
Luttik, J. (2000) `The Value of Trees, Water and Open Space as Reflected by House Prices in the Netherlands', Landscape and Urban Planning48: 161-7.
26.
McCarthy, J., Lloyd, G. and Illsley, B. (2002) `National Parks in Scotland: Balancing Environment and Economy', European Planning Studies10 (5): 665-70.
27.
MacHarg, I.L. (1971) Design with Nature. New YorkDoubleday, Garden City.
28.
Morancho, A.B. (2003) `A Hedonic Valuation of Urban Green Areas', Landscape and Urban Planning66: 35-41.
29.
Munda, G. (1997) `Multicriteria Evaluation as a Multidimensional Approach to Welfare Measurement', in J.C.J.M. van den Bergh and J. van der Straaten (eds) Economy and Ecosystems in Change: Analytical and Historical Approaches, 96-115. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.
30.
Naess, P. (2001) `Urban Planning and Sustainable Development', European Planning Studies9 (4): 503-24.
31.
Nijkamp, P. (2004) Environmental Economics and Evaluation, Vol. 4 . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers .
32.
Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P. and Voogd, H. (1990) Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning. Amsterdam: North Holland.
33.
Nunes, P.A.L.D, van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. and Nijkamp, P. (2003) The Ecological Economics of Biodiversity: Methods, Values and Policy Applications. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.
34.
Priemus, H. (1999) `Sustainable Cities: How to Realize an Ecological Breakthrough: a Dutch Approach', International Planning Studies4 (2): 213-36.
35.
Roelofs, J. (1999) `Building and Designing with Nature: Urban Design', Greening Cities: Building Just and Sustainable Communities, New York, NY: The Bootstrap Press.
36.
Rossman, B.B. and Ulehla, Z.J. (1977) `Psychological Reward Values Associated with Wilderness Use: a Functional-reinforcement Approach', Environment and Behaviour9 (1): 41-66.
37.
Roy, B. (1990) `Decision Aid and Decision Making', in C.A. Bana e Costa (ed.) Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, pp. 17-35. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
38.
Scottish Executive (2001) Rethinking Open Space. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office. Kit Campbell Associates.
39.
Solecki, W.D. and Welch, J.M. (1995) `Urban Parks: Green Spaces or Green Walls?', Landscape and Urban Planning32: 93-106.
40.
Stanners, D. and Bourdeau, P. (1995) Europe's Environment: the Dobris Assessment. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
41.
Turner, R.K., Button, K. and Nijkamp, P. (eds) (1999) Ecosystems and Nature: Economics, Science and Policy, Environmental Analysis and Economic Policy, Series 7. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.
42.
Tyrväinen, L. and Väänänen, H. (1998) `The Economic Value of Urban Forest Amenities: an Application of the Contingent Valuation Method', Landscape and Urban Planning43: 105-18.
43.
Ulrich, R.S. (1981) `Natural Versus Urban Scenes: Some Psychophysiological Effects', Environmental Behavior13 (5): 523-56.
44.
Ulrich, R.S. (1984) `View through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery', Science224 (4647): 420-1.
45.
URGE Team (Corporate Authors) (2004) Making Greener Cities - a Practical Guide, No. 8/2004. Leipzig-Halle: UFZ Centre for Environmental Research .
46.
van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (ed.) (1999) Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar Publishers.
47.
Vreeker, R., Nijkamp, P. and Welle, C.T. (2002) A Multicriteria Decision Support Methodology for Evaluating Airport Expansion Plans', Transportation Research Part D, 7: 27-47.
