This paper examines the spatial distribution of agricultural productivity in the European regions for the period 1990–2000, using a twofold descriptive and explanatory approach that allows us to overcome some of the drawbacks of conventional convergence analysis. The spatial distribution of agricultural productivity is summarized in a regional typology that enables us to evaluate the distribution of agricultural productivity and trends across European regions. The various inequality indices and estimated density functions reveal a decrease in regional agricultural productivity disparities, and intra-distribution mobility appears to be relatively limited during the study period. Additionally, the results obtained from the regression analysis are in line with those obtained at the national level. Finally, our non-parametric approach permits us to assess the role of variables such as economic development, agricultural structure and productive specialization in the dynamics of the distribution under analysis.
AbramsonIS (1982) On bandwidth variation in kernel estimates – a square root law. Annals of Statistics10(4): 1217–1223.
2.
AlauddinMHeadeyDRaoDSP (2005) Explaining agricultural productivity levels and growth: An international perspective. Working Paper Series No. 02/2005, CEPA, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
3.
AlvarezAAriasC (2004) Technical efficiency and farm size: A conditional analysis. Agricultural Economics30(3): 241–250.
4.
AndersonG (2004) Toward an empirical analysis of polarization. Journal of Econometrics122(1): 1–26.
5.
AnselinL (1988) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6.
AnselinL (1999) Spatial econometrics. Working Paper, Bruton Center, School of Social Science, University of Texas.
7.
AnselinLBeraAFloraxRYoonM (1996) Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics26(1): 77–104.
8.
ArmstrongHW (2002) European Union regional policy: Reconciling the convergence and evaluation evidence. In: CuadradoJRParelladaM (eds) Regional Convergence in the European Union: Facts, Prospects and Policies. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 231–272.
9.
ArnadeC (1998) Using a programming approach to measure international agricultural efficiency and productivity. Journal of Agricultural Economics49(1): 67–84.
10.
BallVEGollopFMKelyy-HawkeASwinandGP (1999) Patterns of state productivity growth in the U.S. farm sector: Linking state and aggregate models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics81(1): 164–179.
11.
BallVEBureauJCButaultJPNehringR (2001) Levels of farm sector productivity: An international comparison. Journal of Productivity Analysis15(1): 5–29.
12.
BallVEHallahanCNehringR (2004) Convergence of productivity: An analysis of the catch-up hypothesis within a panel of states. American Journal of Agricultural Economics86(5): 1315–1321.
13.
BarhamBLFoltzJDJackson-SmithDMoonS (2004) The dynamics of agricultural biotechnology adoption: Lesson from rBST use in Wisconsin, 1994–2001. American Journal of Agricultural Economics86(1): 61–72.
14.
BarroRSala-i-MartinX (1992) Convergence. Journal of Political Economy100(2): 407–443.
15.
BarroRSala-i-MartinX (1995) Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
BillónMEzcurraRLeraF (2008) The spatial distribution of the Internet in the European Union: Does geographical proximity matter?European Planning Studies16(1): 119–142.
17.
BulliS (2001) Distribution dynamics and cross-country convergence: A new approach. Scottish Journal of Political Economy48(2): 226–243.
18.
BurrellAOskamA (2000) Agricultural policy and enlargement of the European Union. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.
19.
CamagniRCapellinR (1985) La Productivité sectorielle et la politique régionale. Brussels: European Commission.
20.
CastilloJSCuervaMC (2006) Análisis de la convergencia en productividad agraria en las regiones europeas. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales10: 89–105.
21.
ChatterjeeSPriceB (1991) Regression Diagnostics. New York: John Wiley.
22.
ChenZSongS (2008) Efficiency and technology gap in China’s agriculture: A regional meta-frontier analysis. China Economic Review19(2): 287–296.
23.
CheshirePMagriniS (2000) Endogenous processes in European regional growth: Convergence and policy. Growth and Change31(4): 455–479.
24.
CoelliTRahmanSThirtleC (2003) A stochastic frontier approach to total factor productivity measurement in Bangladesh crop agriculture, 1961–92. Journal of International Development15(3): 321–333.
25.
CoelliTJRaoDSP (2005) Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: A Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980–2000. Agricultural Economics32(1): 115–134.
CraigBJPardeyPGRoseboomJ (1997) International productivity patterns: Accounting for input quality, infrastructure and research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics79(4): 1064–1076.
28.
CuadradoJR (2001) Regional convergence in the European Union: From hypothesis to the actual trends. Annals of Regional Science35(3): 333–356.
29.
CuervaMC (2009) Productividad y convergencia en las agriculturas regionales europeas. Determinantes de su evolución. Paper presented at the XII Encuentro de Economía Aplicada, Madrid, Spain.
30.
DurlaufSNQuahD (1999) The new empirics of economic growth. In: TaylorJBWoodfordM (eds) Handbook of Macroeconomics, vol. 1A. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 231–304.
31.
EckeyHFTürckM (2007) Convergence of EU regions. A literature report. Investigaciones Regionales10: 5–32.
32.
EldmannU (2002) Agricultural productivity indicators – State of development. STD/NA/AGR 13. Paris: OECD.
33.
EnfloKHjertstrandP (2009) Relative source of European regional productivity convergence: A bootstrap frontier approach. Regional Studies43(5): 643–659.
34.
ErturCLe GalloJBaumontC (2006) The European regional convergence process, 1980–1995: Do spatial regimes and spatial dependence matter?International Regional Science Review29(1): 3–34.
35.
EspostiR (2007) Regional growth and policies in the European Union: Does the Common Agricultural Policy have a counter-treatment effect?American Journal of Agricultural Economics89(1): 116–134.
36.
European Commission (1981) Study of the Regional Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy. Regional Policy Series No. 21. Brussels.
37.
European Commission (1994) The Agricultural Income Situation in Less Favoured Areas of the EC. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
38.
European Commission (2004) A New Partnership for Cohesion, Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation. Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
39.
European Commission (2007) Growing Regions Growing Europe. Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
40.
EvensonRE (2001) Economic impacts of agricultural research and extension. In: GardnerBLRausserGC (eds) Handbook of Agricultural Economics, vol. 1A. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 573–628.
41.
EzcurraRGilCPascualPRapúnM (2005) Inequality, polarization and regional mobility in the European Union. Urban Studies42(7): 1057–1076.
42.
EzcurraRIraizozBPascualPRapúnM (2008) Spatial disparities in the European agriculture: A regional analysis. Applied Economics40(13): 1669–1684.
43.
FedericoG (2005) Why are we alive? The growth of agricultural productivity and its causes, 1800–2000. Paper presented at the Sixth Conference of the European Historical Economics Society, Istanbul.
44.
FiaschiDLavezziA (2007) Productivity polarization and sectoral dynamics in European regions. Journal of Macroeconomics29(3): 612–637.
45.
FulginitiLEPerrinRK (1998) Agriculture productivity in developing countries. Agricultural Economics19(1–2): 45–51.
46.
GardinerBMartinRTylerP (2004) Competitiveness, productivity and economic growth across the European regions. Regional Studies38(9): 1045–1067.
47.
GloyBAAkridgeJT (2000) Computer and internet adoption on large U.S. farms. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review3(1): 323–338.
48.
GopinathMRoeTL (1997) Sources of sectoral growth in an economy wide context: The case of U.S. agriculture. Journal of Productivity Analysis8(3): 293–310.
49.
GutierrezL (2000) Convergence in US and EU agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economic27(2): 187–206.
50.
GutierrezL (2002) Why is agricultural labour productivity higher in some countries than others?Agricultural Economics Review3(1): 58–72.
51.
HelfandSMLevineES (2004) Farm size and the determinants of productive efficiency in the Brazilian Center-West. Agricultural Economics31(2–3): 241–249.
52.
HuffmanWEEvensonRE (1992) Contributions of public and private science and technology to U.S. agricultural productivity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics74(3): 751–756.
53.
HuffmanWEEvensonRE (2006) Do formula or competitive grant funds have greater impacts on state agricultural productivity?American Journal of Agricultural Economics88(4): 783–798.
54.
JohnsonDG (1997) Agriculture and the wealth of nations. American Economic Review87(2): 1–12.
55.
KaragiannisGSarrisA (2005) Measuring and explaining scale efficiency with the parametric approach: The case of Greek tobacco growers. Agricultural Economics33(s3): 441–451.
56.
KoesterU (2005) A revival of large farms in Eastern Europe – how important are institutions?Agricultural Economics32(s1): 102–113.
57.
KrugmanP (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy99(3): 483–499.
58.
KrugmanP (1998) What’s new about the new economic geography?Oxford Review of Economic Policy14(2): 7–17.
59.
LiuYShumwayCRRosenmanRBallVE (2009) Productivity growth and convergence in US agriculture: New cointegration panel data results. Applied Economics (iFirst).
60.
LlewelynRVWilliamsJR (1996) Nonparametric analysis of technical, pure technical and scale efficiencies for food and crop production in East Java, Indonesia. Agricultural Economics15(2): 113–126.
61.
López-BazoEDel BarrioTArtisM (2002) The regional distribution of Spanish unemployment. Papers in Regional Science81(3): 365–389.
62.
LucasRE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics22(1): 3–42.
63.
McCunnAHuffmanWE (2000) Convergence in U.S. productivity growth for agriculture: Implications of interstate research spillovers for funding agricultural research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics82(2): 370–388.
MonfortP (2008) Convergence of EU regions. Measures and evolutions. Working Paper 1/2008, Directorate General for Regional Policy, European Union.
66.
MykhnenkoVSwainA (2010) Ukraine’s diverging space-economy: The Orange Revolution, post-Soviet development models and regional trajectories. European Urban and Regional Studies17(2).
67.
OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] (2001) Productivity Manual. A Guide to the Measurement of Industry-level and Aggregate Productivity Growth. Paris: OECD.
QuahD (1993) Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. European Economic Review37(2–3): 426–434.
70.
QuahD (1996a) Empirics for economic growth and convergence. European Economic Review40(6): 1353–1375.
71.
QuahD (1996b) Twin peaks, growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics. The Economic Journal106: 1045–1055.
72.
QuahD (1996c) Regional convergence clusters across Europe. European Economic Review40(3–5): 951–958.
73.
RezitisAN (2005) Agricultural productivity across Europe and the United States of America. Applied Economics Letters12: 443–446.
74.
RezitisAN (2009) Agricultural productivity and convergence: Europe and the United States. Applied Economics (iFirst).
75.
RomerPM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy94(5): 1002–1037.
76.
RomerPM (1994) The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives8(1): 3–22.
77.
RuttanVW (2002) Productivity growth in world agriculture: Sources and constraints. Journal of Economic Perspectives16(4): 161–184.
78.
SargentTCRodríguezE (2001) Labour or total factor productivity: Do we need to choose?Working Paper 2001–04, Economic Studies and Policy Analysis Division, Economic and Fiscal Policy Branch, Department of Finance, Canada.
79.
SassiM (2006) Agricultural convergence and competitiveness in the EU-15 regions. Contributed paper prepared for presentation at the International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Gold Coast, Australia.
80.
SassiM (2009) OLS and GWR approaches in agricultural convergence in the EU-15. International Advances Economics Research (Online First).
ShucksmithMThomsonKJRobertsD (2005) The CAP and the Regions: The Territorial Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
83.
SchultzTW (1964) Transforming Traditional Agriculture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
84.
SchultzTW (1965) Economic Crises in World Agriculture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
85.
SilvermanB (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 26. London: Chapman & Hall.
86.
SolowR (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics70(1): 65–94.
87.
SouleMJTegeneAWiebeKD (2000) Land tenure and the adoption of conservation practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics82(4): 993–1005.
88.
SmithATimarJ (2010) Uneven transformations: Space, economy and society 20 years after the collapse of state socialism. European Urban and Regional Studies17(2).
89.
TheilH (1967) Economics and Information Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
90.
Van BieserbroeckJ (2009) Disaggregate productivity comparisons: Sectoral convergence in OECD countries. Journal of Productivity Analysis32(2): 63–79.
91.
WichernR (2004) Economics of the Common Agricultural Policy. Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Brussels: European Commission.
