Social enterprises struggle greatly to pursue the twofold goal of attaining financial viability while also meeting social objectives. Sometimes, the quest for financial returns leads to the mission drift of social enterprises. The bibliometric analysis reviews academic sources published between 2001 and 2025 on the financial landscape of social enterprises, with a final sample of 129 documents identified in the Scopus database. The results show that academic interest in the field of study has been growing steadily. The use of keywords reflects current research trends, including social investment, impact investment, crowdfunding and social innovation, indicating the emergence of innovative financial mechanisms that integrate social and financial goals. Recent literature shows growing interest in impact investing as an accelerator of social innovation, enabling social enterprises to expand their social impact. It also highlights the need to create new financial instruments to ensure long-term financial sustainability and to drive social impact in the fast-evolving financial ecosystem.
AdemolaA. H., OlajideO. P., AyodeleA. Y., & OlusolaA. J. (2019). An examination of financing practices of social entrepreneurs in Nigeria: A study of selected non-governmental organisations. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 25(2), 1–17.
2.
AgrawalA., & JespersenK. (2024). How do impact investors evaluate an investee social enterprise? A framework of impact investing process. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 16(4), 999–1022.
3.
AllenB., HannantA., JacksonB., MorrisseyL., & TiernanA. (2023). The promise and challenge of social innovation and social enterprise. The Oxford handbook of governance and public management for social policy. Oxford University Press.
4.
AndrikopoulosA. (2020). Delineating social finance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 70, 101519.
5.
AustinJ., StevensonH., & Wei-SkillernJ. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practise, 30(1), 1–22.
6.
BaasJ., SchottenM., PlumeA., CôtéG., & KarimiR. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386.
7.
BacqS., HartogC., & HoogendoornB. (2013). A quantitative comparison of social and commercial entrepreneurship: Toward a more nuanced understanding of social entrepreneurship organizations in context. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 40–68.
8.
Baraibar-DiezE., LunaM., OdriozolaM. D., & LlorenteI. (2020). Mapping social impact: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 12(22), 9389.
9.
BattilanaJ., & DoradoS. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.
10.
BattilanaJ., & LeeM. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.
11.
BennouriM., CozarencoA., & NyarkoS. A. (2024). Women on boards and performance trade-offs in social enterprises: Insights from microfinance. Journal of Business Ethics, 190(1), 165–198.
12.
BhattaraiC. R., KwongC. C., & TasavoriM. (2019). Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Research, 96, 47–60.
13.
BodiniR., & SalvatoriG. (2023). Finance sector. In YiI. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the social and solidarity economy (p. 216). Edward Elgar Publishing.
14.
BrandsenT., & KarréP. M. (2011). Hybrid organizations: No cause for concern?International Journal of Public Administration, 34(13), 827–836.
15.
CarèR., CarèS., & FatimaR. (2025). Driving positive social and environmental impacts through equity crowdfunding: Evidence from social enterprises. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets.
16.
CarèR., CarèS., LévyN., & FatimaR. (2023). Missing finance in social impact bond research? A bibliometric overview between past and future research. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(5), 2101–2120.
17.
CasasnovasG., & FerraroF. (2022). Speciation in nascent markets: Collective learning through cultural and material scaffolding. Organization Studies, 43(6), 829–860.
18.
ChanC. H., ChuiC. H. K., ChanK. S. T., & YipP. S. F. (2019). The role of the social innovation and entrepreneurship development fund in fostering social entrepreneurship in Hong Kong: A study on public policy innovation. Social Policy & Administration, 53(6), 903–919.
19.
ChangC. T., & ChengS. F. (2024). Policy drivers and tools influencing the development of social enterprises in Taiwan. Social Enterprise Journal, 20(4), 522–539.
20.
ChaudhuriR., VrontisD., ChavanG., & ShamsS. R. (2023). Social business enterprises as a research domain: A bibliometric analysis and research direction. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 186–200.
21.
ChellE. (2007). Social enterprise and entrepreneurship: Towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process. International Small Business Journal, 25(1), 5–26.
22.
ChenN., & ShabbirM. S. (2025). Social entrepreneurship education landscape mapping: A bibliometric analysis and analysis of empirical research. The International Journal of Management Education, 23(2), 101122.
23.
CooperL., EvnineJ., FinkelmanJ., HuntingtonK., & LynchD. (2016). Social finance and the postmodern portfolio: Theory and practice. The Journal of Wealth Management, 18(4), 9.
24.
DaviesI. A., HaughH., & ChambersL. (2019). Barriers to social enterprise growth. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(4), 1616–1636.
25.
DefournyJ., & NyssensM. (2010). Social enterprise in Europe: At the crossroads of market, public policies and third sector. Policy and Society, 29(3), 231–242.
26.
DefournyJ., NyssensM., & BrolisO. (2019). Mapping and testing social enterprise models across the world: Evidence from the “International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project”(ICSEM Working Papers No. 50). ICSEM.
27.
DionisioM. (2019). The evolution of social entrepreneurship research: A bibliometric analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 15(1), 22–45.
28.
DohertyB., HaughH., & LyonF. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436.
29.
DunggioT., UhaiS., EvlyF., LimpoL., & SampeF. (2024). Mapping social entrepreneurship concepts through bibliometric analysis. The Es Economics and Entrepreneurship, 2(3), 208–216.
30.
DuoJ., DuttaS., & LiC. (2025). Social finance: A strategic literature review and bibliometric analysis. The Palgrave handbook of social finance (pp. 69–98). Springer.
31.
EbrahimA., BattilanaJ., & MairJ. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 34, 81–100.
32.
EbrahimA., & RanganV. K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118–141.
33.
FaraudelloA., ManuelaB., DanielI., & FedericaL. (2021). The impact of social enterprises: A bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2020. International Journal of Financial Research, 12(3), 20214.
34.
FernandesE. D. S., GrochauI. H., & Ten CatenC. S. (2023). Impact investing: Determinants of external financing of social enterprises in Brazil. Sustainability, 15(15), 11935.
35.
GeobeyS., & WeberO. (2013). Lessons in operationalizing social finance: The case of Vancouver City Savings Credit Union. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 3(2), 124–137.
36.
GiderlerM. E., & VanclayF. (2024). Improving the good in good organizations: The potential value of social impact assessment for social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-02-2024-0026
37.
GlänzelG., & ScheuerleT. (2016). Social impact investing in Germany: Current impediments from investors’ and social entrepreneurs’ perspectives. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(4), 1638–1668.
38.
GranadosM. L., HlupicV., CoakesE., & MohamedS. (2011). Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship research and theory: A bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2010. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(3), 198–218.
39.
HaileyJ., & SalwayM. (2018). New routes to CSO sustainability: The strategic shift to social enterprise and social investment. In Civil society sustainability (pp. 54–65). Routledge.
40.
HazenbergR., & Paterson-YoungC. (2025). Hybrid coping: The impact of Covid-19 on social enterprise resilience. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 36, 93–107.
41.
HazenbergR., SeddonF., & DennyS. (2015). Intermediary perceptions of investment readiness in the UK social investment market. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(3), 846–871.
42.
HevenstoneD., FraserA., HobiL., PrzepiorkaW., & GeukeG. G. (2023). The impact of social impact bond financing. Public Administration Review, 83(4), 930–946.
43.
HirschmannM., & MoritzA. (2019). Social finance in Europe: The transition from grants to follow-up financing for social enterprises. In Contemporary developments in entrepreneurial finance: An academic and policy lens on the status-quo, challenges and trends (pp. 251–275). Springer.
44.
HöchstädterA. K., & ScheckB. (2015). What’s in a name: An analysis of impact investing understandings by academics and practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 449–475.
45.
HudsonR. (2009). Life on the edge: Navigating the competitive tensions between the ‘social’ and the ‘economic’ in the social economy and in its relations to the mainstream. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(4), 493–510.
46.
İrengunO. (2025). A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship research: Trends, patterns, and future directions. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 75(1), 222–245.
47.
IswoyoA., FauzuddinY., ErmawatiY., BasukiB., WasilM., & AfkarT. (2025). Business model for social enterprises: All years bibliometric analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-11-2024-0176
48.
JensonJ. (2017). Modernising the European social paradigm: Social investments and social entrepreneurs. Journal of Social Policy, 46(1), 31–47.
49.
JohnR. (2012). Venture philanthropy: Venturing into entrepreneurial philanthropy. The world that changes the world: How philanthropy, innovation, and entrepreneurship are transforming the social ecosystem (pp. 155–174). Wiley.
50.
KajiitaR. M., & Kang’etheS. M. (2020). The prospects of social entrepreneurship in South Africa: Lessons for social development practitioners. Journal of Human Ecology, 69(1–3), 95–106.
51.
KatoS. (2021). Social performance measurement adoption in nascent social enterprises: Refining the institutional model. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 15, e00244.
52.
KickulJ., & LyonsT. S. (2015). Financing social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(2), 83–85.
53.
KlarinA., & SusenoY. (2023). An integrative literature review of social entrepreneurship research: Mapping the literature and future research directions. Business & Society, 62(3), 565–611.
54.
KozarŁ. J. (2023). Sustainable development and social enterprises: A bibliometric analysis. Scientific papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization & Management/Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slaskiej. Seria Organizacji i Zarzadzanie (p. 187). Silesian University of Technology.
55.
KrlevG., SauerS., ScharpeK., MildenbergerG., ElsemannK., & SauerhammerM. (2021). Financing social innovation—International evidence. Centre for Social Investment (CSI), University of Heidelberg & Social Entrepreneurship NetworkDeutschlande.V. (SEND).
56.
KuruczE. C., ColbertB. A., & WheelerD. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In CraneA., McWilliamsA., MattenD., MoonJ., & SiegelD. S. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 83–112). Oxford University Press.
57.
LallS. A. (2019). From legitimacy to learning: How impact measurement perceptions and practices evolve in social enterprise–social finance organization relationships. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(3), 562–577.
58.
LallS. A., & ParkJ. (2022). How social ventures grow: Understanding the role of philanthropic grants in scaling social entrepreneurship. Business & Society, 61(1), 3–44.
59.
LeeP., & SeoY. W. (2017). Directions for social enterprise from an efficiency perspective. Sustainability, 9(10), 1914.
60.
LehnerO. M. (2013). Crowdfunding social ventures: A model and research agenda. Venture Capital, 15(4), 289–311.
61.
LehnerO. M., & NichollsA. (2014). Social finance and crowdfunding for social enterprises: A public–private case study providing legitimacy and leverage. Venture Capital, 16(3), 271–286.
62.
Liñares-ZegarraJ. M., & WilsonJ. O. (2024). Access to finance for UK social enterprises. The European Journal of Finance, 30(15), 1757–1784.
63.
MadichieN. O., & ReadM. (2008). An evaluation of the uneasy transition towards social enterprise UK. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 5(4), 393–409.
64.
MagomedovaN., & Bastida-VialcanetR. (2022). Unmasking the barriers to financing social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(3), 550–560.
65.
MaioliniR., CapoF., & VenturiP. (2025). Innovating for social good: Digital transformation and crisis-based entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 32(4), 981–1000.
66.
MairJ., & MartiI. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.
67.
MartinM. (2015). Building impact businesses through hybrid financing. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(2), 109–126.
68.
MassihiN., RatinhoT., & BruneelJ. (2025). Understanding impact investment: A literature review, bibliometric mapping, and research agenda. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1–28.
69.
MoodyM., LittlepageL., & PaydarN. (2015). Measuring social return on investment: Lessons from organizational implementation of SROI in the Netherlands and the United States. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(1), 19–37.
70.
MulyaningsihH. D., YudokoG., & RuditoB. (2016). Knowledge-based social innovation process in social enterprise: A conceptual framework. Advanced Science Letters, 22(5–6), 1393–1397.
71.
NgaJ. K. H., & ShamuganathanG. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 259–282.
72.
NichollsA. (2010). The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 70–100.
73.
NwankwoE., PhillipsN., & TraceyP. (2007). Social investment through community enterprise: The case of multinational corporations involvement in the development of Nigerian water resources. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(1), 91–101.
74.
O’LearyS., & BrennanA. (2017). Ireland’s social finance landscape. ACRN Oxford Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 6, 90–112.
75.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Job creation through the social economy and social entrepreneurship. OECD Publishing.
76.
OrmistonJ., CharltonK., DonaldM. S., & SeymourR. G. (2015). Overcoming the challenges of impact investing: Insights from leading investors. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(3), 352–378.
77.
PeredoA. M., & McLeanM. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65.
78.
PowellM., GillettA., & DohertyB. (2019). Sustainability in social enterprise: Hybrid organizing in public services. Public Management Review, 21(2), 159–186.
79.
QuacoeD., YushengK., & QuacoeD. (2022). Assessing social entrepreneurship in South Africa. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies, 9, 28–38.
80.
ReederN., ColantonioA., LoderJ., & Rocyn JonesG. (2015). Measuring impact in impact investing: An analysis of the predominant strength that is also its greatest weakness. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(3), 136–154.
81.
RevkoA., VerbytskaA., ZaharinaT., & Marks‑KrzyszkowskaM. (2023). The financial dimension of developing social entrepreneurship: Polish and Ukrainian experiences. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 26(4), 105–122.
82.
SalvadoJ. C. (2011). Social enterprise models and SPO financial sustainability: The case of BRAC. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 79–98.
83.
SantosF. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351.
84.
SatarM. S., AggarwalD., BansalR., & AlarifiG. (2023). Mapping the knowledge structure and unveiling the research trends in social entrepreneurship and inclusive development: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 15(7), 5626.
85.
ScarlataM., & AlemanyL. (2010). Deal structuring in philanthropic venture capital investments: Financing instrument, valuation and covenants. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(Suppl. 2), 121–145.
86.
SenguptaS., & SahayA. (2018). Social enterprises in the Indian context: Conceptualizing through qualitative lens. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 8(1), 1.
87.
ShamimT., & AhmadN. (2025). Mapping the intellectual landscape of digital financial inclusion, MSMEs and entrepreneurship in India. SEDME (Small Enterprises Development, Management & Extension Journal), 52(3), 314–330.
88.
SiegnerM., PinkseJ., & PanwarR. (2018). Managing tensions in a social enterprise: The complex balancing act to deliver a multi-faceted but coherent social mission. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1314–1324.
89.
SinderbrandM. (2023). Who should fund social innovation? In WalkerT., McGaugheyJ., GoubranS., & WagdyN. (Eds.), Innovations in social finance: Transitioning beyond economic value (p. 375). Edward Elgar Publishing.
90.
SinghaniaM., & SwamiD. (2024). Impact investing: Scientometric review and research agenda. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 33(3), 251–286.
91.
SvirinaA., SyurkovaS., MurtazinaG., LaisanisA. N., & AppalonovaN. (2016). Evaluation of financial instruments for social innovation development. In WMSCI-2016—20th world multi-conference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics, proceedings. International Institute of Informatics and Systemics (IIIS).
92.
TalukderS. C., & LaknerZ. (2023). Exploring the landscape of social entrepreneurship and crowdfunding: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 15(12), 9411.
93.
TekulaR., & AndersenK. (2019). The role of government, nonprofit, and private facilitation of the impact investing marketplace. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(1), 142–161.
94.
VigS. (2025). Delineating the novel aspects of the Indian social stock exchange: A new instrument for social finance. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 16(3), 869–890.
95.
Wei-SkillernJ. (2007). Entrepreneurship in the social sector (Vol. 13). Sage Publications.
96.
WilsonF., PostJ., GrzywinskiR., & HoughtonM. (2014). Social innovation and investment: The ShoreBank experience. In Socially responsible investment in the 21st century: Does it make a difference for society? (pp. 65–89). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
97.
WryT., & ZhaoE. Y. (2018). Taking trade-offs seriously: Examining the contextually contingent relationship between social outreach intensity and financial sustainability in global microfinance. Organization Science, 29(3), 507–528.
98.
YunusM. (2003). Halving poverty by 2015—We can actually make it happen. The Round Table, 92(370), 363–375.
99.
ZhengS. (2018). Investigation into funding strategies of social enterprises. The China Nonprofit Review, 10(1), 34–61.
100.
ZietlowJ. T. (2001). Social entrepreneurship: Managerial, finance and marketing aspects. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 9(1–2), 19–43.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
