Asymmetrical power relations between ‘us’, or the in-group, and the ‘others’, or the out-group, are key to the construction and understanding of otherisation. Otherness in Meghalaya, Northeast India is made complex by historical, geopolitical, social, linguistic and cultural factors that are instrumental in creating boundaries between the tribal and non-tribal populace. The present article examines discourses of non-tribal people being ‘othered’ by their tribal counterparts, the majoritarian Khasis in Meghalaya. Employing Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), the article examines representations of the ‘othering’ of non-tribal ‘others’ in media texts drawn from English-medium newspapers, magazines and a blog. Evidently, issues of control, and dominance, are pivotal to the power struggles between the ethnic groups in the state, which are inherent in the process of othering. The othering of northeasterners in mainland India is evident in discourse that prods reverse otherisation of non-tribal Indians in the Northeast, including Meghalaya. Clearly, an analysis of such texts also reveals the role of identity politics and ethnonational groups as pivotal to othering. Finally, identity threat, race-based differentiation and loss of citizenship allude to outcomes of otherisation.
AbizadehA. (2001). Ethnicity, race, and a possible humanity. World Order, 33(1), 23–34.
2.
AkoijamB. A. (2012, August28). ‘The mainstream’ and the Northeast: The curious case of contrasting images. The Imphal Free Press. Retrieved from http://www.ifp.co.in
3.
Bar-TalD. (1997). Formation and change of ethnic and national stereotypes: An integrative model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21(4), 491–523.
4.
BaruahA. K. (2003). Tribal traditions and crises of governance in Northeast India, with special reference to Meghalaya (Crisis States Program Working Paper Series No. 1). London, UK: Development Research Centre, DESTIN.
5.
BaruahA. K. (2004). Ethnic conflicts and traditional self-governing institutions: A study of Laitumkhrah Dorbar (Crisis States Program Working Papers Series No. 39). London, UK: Development Research Centre, DESTIN.
6.
BhattacharjeeN. (2015, April17). The poignancy of engagement. Hardnews. Retrieved from http://hardnewsmedia.com
CinnirellaM. (1996). A social identity perspective on European integration. In BreakwellG. M.LyonsE. (Eds.), Changing European identities: Social psychological analyses of social change (pp. 253–273). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
9.
CouplandN. (1999). ‘Other’ representation. In VerschuerenJ.OstmanO.BlommaertJ.BulcaenC. (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam, Netherlands; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
10.
ElwinV. (Ed.). (1959). India’s north-east frontier in the nineteenth century. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
ElwinV. (Ed.). (1969). The Nagas in the nineteenth century. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
FaircloughN. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
13.
FaircloughN. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London and New York, NY: Longman.
14.
FaircloughN. (1999). Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. In JaworskiA.CouplandN. (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 183–211). London, UK: Routledge.
15.
FaircloughN. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London, UK: Longman.
16.
FaircloughN. (2002). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Routledge.
17.
FaircloughN. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Routledge.
18.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. F. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
19.
FowlerR. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London, UK: Routledge.
20.
GaltungJ. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.
21.
GillespieA. (2006). Becoming other: From social interaction to self-reflection. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
22.
HallidayM. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
23.
HaokipT. H. (2014). Inter-ethnic relations in Meghalaya. Asian Ethnicity, 15(3), 302–316. doi:10.1080/14631369.2013.853545.
24.
HendersonR. (2005). A Faircloughian approach to CDA: Principled eclecticism or a method searching for theory?Melbourne Studies in Education, 46(2), 9–24.
HowarthC. (2002). Identity in whose eyes: The role of representations in identity construction. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(2), 145–162.
27.
KharshiingK. D. (2016). Explicating ethnic identity of the Khasi in North-East India through the lens of the identity process theory. Psychological Studies, 61(3), 197–210.
28.
LangerA. (2012, July21). Northeast’s reverse racism. Tehelka. Retrieved from http://www.tehelka.com
29.
LaskarR. H. (2015, March09). ‘My father was dragged out of the bus and beaten’: Other face of NE racism. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from http://wwwhindustantimes.com
30.
LehtonenJ. (2005). Stereotypes and collective identification. In PetkovaD.LehtonenJ. (Eds.), Cultural identity in an intercultural context (pp. 61–85). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
31.
LeVineR. A.CampellC. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism. New York, NY: Wiley.
32.
MahalingamR. (2003). Essentialism, culture and power: Representations of social class. Journal of Social Issues, 59(4), 733–749.
33.
MalngiangP. (2002). Student and youth organisations in Meghalaya. In BaruahA. K. (Ed.), Student power in North East India (pp. 173–196). New Delhi, India: Regency Publications.
34.
MathurP. R. G. (1982). Khasi solidarity movement. In SinghK. S. (Ed.), Tribal movements in India (pp. 181–202). New Delhi, India: Manohar.
35.
McDuie-RaD. (2007). Anti-development or identity crisis? Misreading civil society in Meghalaya, India. Asian Ethnicity, 8(1), 43–45.
36.
MukhimP. (1996). Conflict and its resolution: A case/study of a modern tribal situation. In AgrawalM. M. (Ed.), Ethnicity, culture and nationalism in North-East India (pp. 29–37). New Delhi, India: Indus Publishing Company.
37.
MukhimP. (2013, March22). Non-tribals in Meghalaya - non citizens or half citizens?The Shillong Times. Retrieved from http://www.shillongtimes.com
38.
MukhimP. (2014, April26). Politics of identity and location. The Hindu. Retrieved from http://wwwthehindu.com
39.
MoscoviciS. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public [Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
40.
NongbriT. (2003). Development, ethnicity and gender. Jaipur and New Delhi, India: Rawat Publications.
41.
NongbriT.ShimreiwungA. S. (2017). Migration, identity and conflict: Lived experiences of Northeasteners in Delhi. New Delhi, India: Rawat Publications.
42.
NongkynrihA. K. (2002). Khasi society of Meghalaya: A sociological understanding. New Delhi, India: Indus Publishing Company.
43.
PhinneyJ. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 499–514.
44.
PhukonG. (2002). Introduction. In PhukonG. (Ed.), Ethnicity and polity in South Asia (pp. 1–20). New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications.
45.
PrasadA. (2003). Against ecological romanticism: Verrier Elwin and the making of the anti-modern tribal identity. New Delhi, India: Three Essays Collective.
46.
RajkhowaA. (2014, February15). Racism and the NE - Exclusion and prejudice. Kafila. Retrieved from https://kafila.online
47.
ReicherS. (2007). Rethinking the paradigm of prejudice. South African Journal of Psychology: Intergroup Contact: Special Issue, 37(4), 820–834.
48.
RoyS. K. (2005). Conflicting nations in North-East India. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(21), 2176–2182.
49.
SchwalbeM.HoldenD.SchrockD.GodwinS.ThompsonS.WolkomirM. (2000). Generic processes in the reproduction of inequality: An interactionist analysis. Social Forces, 79(2), 419–452.
50.
Sen GuptaS. (2005). Regionalism in Meghalaya. New Delhi, India: South Asian Publishers.
51.
SherifM. (1966). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
52.
SherifM.SherifC. W. (1953). Groups in harmony and tension: An integration of studies on inter-group relations. New York, NY: Octagon.
53.
StephanW. G.RenfroC. L. (2002). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 191–207). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
54.
TajfelH. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup relations. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
56.
TripathiR. C. (2016). Violence and the other: Contestations in multicultural societies. In TripathiR. C.SinghP. (Eds.), Perspectives on violence and othering in India (pp. 3–28). New Delhi, India: Springer.
57.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
58.
van DijkT. A. (1986). Racism in the press. London, UK: Arnold.
59.
van DijkT. A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In SchaffnerC.WendenA. L. (Eds.), Language and peace (pp. 17–33). Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
60.
van DijkT. A. (2001). Opinions and ideologies in the press. In BellA.GarrettP. (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse (pp. 21–63). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
61.
VerkuytenM. (2004). The social psychology of ethnic identity. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
62.
WodakR.LudwigC. (Ed.). (1999). Challenges in a changing world: Issues in critical discourse analysis. Vienna, Austria: Passagenverlag.
63.
XaxaV. (1999). Tribes as indigenous peoples of India. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(21), 3589–3595.
64.
XaxaV. (2005). Politics of language, religion and identity: Tribes in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(13), 1363–1370.
