Although women with disabilities constitute a significant proportion of India’s population, their experiences remain marginalised. Notions of women with disabilities are riddled with gendered, ableist stereotypes. As Hindi films are an important reflection of popular perceptions of disability, we analysed six successful films that revolve around women with varied disabilities, which are relatively poorly understood in the country, to assess their portrayals of womanhood and disability. Our main interest was in the points in the films where the women are able to act as agentic selves. We wanted to know the ways in which women express agency as well as the enabling factors and opportunities that they utilise to pursue their objectives. A critical-feminist thematic analysis was used on portrayals to assess their potential to undermine or reinforce prevalent social notions. A comparison of the films showed diverse depictions of the women’s agentic selves, ranging from being fairly self-determined to having little control or choice.
AddlakhaR. (2007). How young people with disabilities conceptualize the body, sex and marriage in urban India: Four case studies. Sexuality and Disability, 25, 111–123.
2.
AddlakhaR. (2022). Slow progress for women with disabilities in India. Current History, 121(834), 129–134.
3.
AhujaA., & OstermannS. L. (2016). Crossing caste boundaries in the modern Indian marriage market. Studies in Comparative International Development, 51, 365–387.
4.
BakerJ. P. (2008). Mercury, vaccines, and autism: One controversy, three histories. American Journal of Public Health, 98(2), 244–253.
5.
BarnesC., & MercerG. (2001). Disability culture: Assimilation or inclusion? In AlbrechtG. L., SeelmanK. D., & BuryM. (Eds), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 515–534). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976251.n22
BattyR., McGrathL., & ReaveyP. (2014). Embodying limb absence in the negotiation of sexual intimacy. Sexualities, 17(5–6), 686–706.
8.
BhansaliS. L. (Director). (2005). Black. [Film]. Applause Entertainment and SLB Films.
9.
BlackR. S., & PretesL. (2007). Victims and victors: Representation of physical disability on the silver screen. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 32(1), 66–83.
10.
BordoS. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. University of California Press.
BoseS. (Director). (2014). Margarita with a straw. [Film]. Viacom 18 Motion Pictures and Ishan Talkies.
13.
BourdieuP. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
14.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
15.
CannellaG. S., & LincolnY. S. (2016). Critical qualitative research in global neoliberalism: Foucault, inquiry, and transformative possibilities. In DenzinN. K. & GiardinaM. D. (Eds), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of research (pp. 51–74). Routledge.
16.
CheuJ. (2009). Seeing blindness on screen: The cinematic gaze of blind female protagonists. The Journal of Popular Culture, 42(3), 480–496.
17.
ChowdhuryA.R. (Director). (2016). Pink. [Film]. Rising Sun Films and Rashmi Sharma Telefilms.
18.
ClogstonJ. S. (1994). Disability coverage in American newspapers. In NelsonJ. A. (Ed.), The disabled, the media, and the information age (pp. 45–57). Greenwood Press.
19.
DarkeP. (2004). The changing face of representations of disability in the media. In SwainJ., FrenchS., & BarnesC. (Eds), Disabling barriers: Enabling environments (2nd ed., pp. 100–105). Sage Publications.
20.
DaruwallaN., ChakravartyS., ChatterjiS., Shah MoreN., AlcockG., HawkesS., & OsrinD. (2013). Violence against women with disability in Mumbai, India: A qualitative study. Sage Open, 3(3), 2158244013499144.
21.
De BecoG. (2021). Disability in international human rights law. Oxford University Press.
22.
DeyD., & TripathiP. (2022). ‘Queen of Misery’ Nirupa Roy: Re-reading the filmic mother of 1980s through alternate care dynamics. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 1–17.
23.
DotsonL. A., StinsonJ., & ChristianL. (2003). People tell me I can’t have sex: Women with disabilities share their personal perspectives on health care, sexuality, and reproductive rights. Women & Therapy, 26(3–4), 195–209.
24.
GalvinR. D. (2005). Researching the disabled identity: Contextualising the identity transformations which accompany the onset of impairment. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(3), 393–413.
25.
Garland-ThomsonR. (2005). Feminist disability studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(2), 1557–1587.
26.
GentileJ. P., DillonK. S., & GilligP. M. (2013). Psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for patients with dissociative identity disorder. Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 10(2), 22.
27.
GhoshN. (2019). Fashioning selves: Femininity, sexuality and disabled women in India. In ChappellP. & de BeerM. (Eds), Diverse voices of disabled sexualities in the global south (pp. 55–73). Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
GiddensA. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. University of California Press.
HandD.D. (Supervising Director). (1937). Snow White and the seven dwarfs. [Film]. Walt Disney Productions.
33.
Human Rights Watch. (2018). World report. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Publications/OHCHRreport2018.pdf
34.
JaureguiB., & McGuinnessT. (2003). Inter-community marriage and social change in contemporary India: Hybridity, selectivity and transnational flows. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 26(1), 71–85.
LandmanM. (2006). Getting quality in qualitative research: A short introduction to feminist methodology and methods. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 65(4), 429–433.
37.
LawlessB., & ChenY. W. (2019). Developing a method of critical thematic analysis for qualitative communication inquiry. Howard Journal of Communications, 30(1), 92–106.
38.
LiC. M. N., & YauM. K. S. (2006). Sexual issues and concerns: Tales of Chinese women with spinal cord impairments. Sexuality and Disability, 24, 1–26.
39.
LjuslinderK. (2014). Empowering images or preserved stereotypes: Representations of disability in contemporary film comedies. Journal of Scandinavian Cinema, 4(3), 267–279.
40.
LloydM. (1992). Does she boil eggs? Towards a feminist model of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7(3), 207–221.
41.
MahendraB. (Director). (1983). Sadma [Film]. Raj Sippy and Romu Sippy.
MarchbankJ. (2004). Women, power and policy: Comparative studies of childcare. Routledge.
44.
McNayL. (2000). Gender and agency: Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Polity Press.
45.
MitchellD., & SnyderS. (2000). Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. University of Michigan Press.
46.
NatuS. A. (2024). Psychology and gender: An advanced reader. Routledge.
47.
O’DellE. J. (2023). Disability on Arab screens: Cripping class, religion, and gender in Syria, Egypt, and Lebanon. Disability & Society, 38(8), 1410–1434.
48.
OwenW. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(3), 274–287.
49.
PalJ. (2013). Physical disability and Indian cinema. In MogkM. E. (Ed.), Different bodies: Essays on disability in film and television (pp. 109–130). McFarland.
SchwartzK., LutfiyyaZ. M., & HansenN. (2013). Dopey’s legacy: Stereotypical portrayals of intellectual disability in classic animated film. In CheuJ. (Ed.), Diversity in Disney films: Critical essays on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality and disability (pp. 179–194). McFarland.
57.
SenA. (Director). (2005). 15 Park Avenue. [Film]. SPS Telefilms.
58.
ShakespeareT., & WatsonN. (1997). Defending the social model. Disability & Society, 12(2), 293–300.
59.
SinhaA. (Director). (2020). Thappad. [Film]. Benaras Mediaworks and T-series.
60.
SippyR.N. (Director). (1982). Satte pe satta. [Film]. Rupam Chitra.
61.
SrinivasanS. (2005). Daughters or dowries? The changing nature of dowry practices in South India. World Development, 33(4), 593–615.
62.
Vanashree. (2019). Freak show in black comedy: Moral and physical disability in Dharamveer Bharati’s ‘Gulki Banno’ (Gulki the Bride). Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 350–363.
63.
WebermannA. R., & BrandB. L. (2017). Mental illness and violent behaviour: The role of dissociation. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 4(1), 1–13.
