European Attitudes Towards Animal Research

Abstract

The goal of this article is to map out attitudes towards animal experimentation in Europe (EU15 plus Switzerland), more specifically, to document the current attitudes, perform cross-national comparison of the trends of attitudes towards animal experimentation and of the explanatory factors of these attitudes. We assume that the conception of nature and science influences the perception of animal research. This study analyses a series of surveys that measure European public attitudes towards science and technology, the Eurobarometer (EB) 2001 and 2005. The majority of European countries refused animal experimentation in 2005 and we observe downward trend in every country, except Belgium and Spain. If the trend is similar among the countries the patterns of explanation of these attitudes are quite heterogeneous. Attitudes towards animal testing are explained in every country by attitudes towards science and nature, and by sociodemographic variables (except in Spain and Austria), and in very few countries by scientific knowledge (Belgium) or by values (Sweden and Switzerland). These results may have consequences for science and contribute therefore to the public understanding of science (PUS) research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allum, Nick , Daniel Boy and Martin Bauer (2002), ‘European Regions and the Knowledge Deficit Model’, in Martin Bauer and Georges Gaskell (eds), Biotechnology: the Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , pp. 224–43.

Bauer, Martin , John Durant and Georges Evans (1994), ‘ European Public Perceptions of Science ’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(2), pp. 163–86 .

Baumans, Vera (2005), ‘ Science-based Assessment of Animal Welfare: Laboratory Animals ’, Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz., 24(2), pp. 503–14 .

Blanchard, Philippe , Fabienne Crettaz von Roten , Romain Felli, Olivier Fillieule and Jean-Philippe Leresche (2007), ‘Le Vote du 27 November 2005 sur l’Animalerie de Dorigny’, Final report, University of Lausanne, Lausanne .

Clark, Stephen R.L. (1984), The Moral Status of Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

Commission of the European Communities (2007), ‘Fifth Report on the Statistics on the Number of Animals used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes in the Member States of the European Union: Annex. Report’, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels .

Cothran, Helen (2002), Animal Experimentation: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego: Greenhaven Press .

Crettaz von Roten, Fabienne (2007), ‘Perceptions of Animals, Nature and Science: A Cross-cultural Perspective’, Proceedings of the International Indicators of Science and the Public Workshop, Royal Society, London , 5–6 November.

Crettaz von Roten, Fabienne (2008), ‘ Mapping Perceptions of Animal Experimentation: Trend and Explanatory Factors ’, Social Science Quarterly, 89(2), pp. 537–49 .

10.

Driscoll, Janis Wiley (1992), ‘ Attitudes towards Animal Use ’, Anthrozoos, 5(1), pp. 32–39 .

11.

Driscoll, Janis Wiley (1995), ‘ Attitudes towards Animals: Species Ratings ’, Society & Animals, 3(2), pp. 139–50 .

12.

Durant, John et al. (2000), ‘Two Cultures of Public Understanding of Science and Technology in Europe’, in Meinolf Dierkes and Claudia von Grote (eds), Between Understanding and Trust: the Public, Science and Technology. Amsterdam: Harwood , pp. 131–56.

13.

Frank, David John (1997), ‘ Science, Nature, and the Globalization of the Environment, 1870–1990 ’, Social Forces, 76(2), pp. 409–37 .

14.

Hagelin, Joakim , Hans-Erik Carlsson and Jann Hau (2003), ‘ An Overview of Surveys on How People View Animal Experimentation: Some Factors that May Influence the Outcome ’, Public Understanding of Science, 12(1), pp. 67–81 .

15.

Jasper, James M. and Dorothy Nelkin (1992), The Animal Rights Crusade: The Growth of a Moral Protest. New York: The Free Press .

16.

Johnston, Philip (2006), ‘Public Turns on Animal Terrorists’, available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk, accessed on 29 May 2007.

17.

Kruse, Corwin R. (1999), ‘ Gender, Views of Nature, and Support for Animal Rights ’, Society & Animals, 7(3), pp. 179–97 .

18.

Mori (2006), ‘Views on Animal Experimentation’, Research study conducted for the Department of Trade and Industry, London .

19.

Pifer, Linda , Kinya Shimizu and Ralph Pifer (1994), ‘ Public Attitudes towards Animal Research: Some International Comparisons ’, Society & Animals, 2(2), pp. 95–113 .

20.

Regan, Tom (1988), ‘Animal Rights’, in Mark Bekoff and Carron A. Meaney (eds), Encyclopedia of Animal Rights and Animal Welfare. Wesport: Greenwood Press , pp. 42–43.

21.

Rothwell, Nancy (2006), ‘Public Engagement on the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research’, in Jon Turney (ed.), Engaging Science: Thoughts, Deeds, Analysis and Action. London: Wellcome Trust Publication , pp. 38–43.

22.

Serpell, James A. (2004), ‘ Factors Influencing Human Attitudes to Animals and their Welfare ’, Animal Welfare, 13(1), pp. 145–51 .

23.

Singer, Peter (1975), Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. New York, NY: Random House .

24.

Taylor, Nicola (2005), ‘ Luddites or Limits? The Attitudes of Animal Rights Activists towards Science ’, Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal, II(4), pp. 1–16 .