Open Innovation Over the Regional and National Boundaries in the Semiconductor Industry: The Effects of Digital Transformation and Decoupling of the Global Value Chain
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2025
Open Innovation Over the Regional and National Boundaries in the Semiconductor Industry: The Effects of Digital Transformation and Decoupling of the Global Value Chain
Decoupling of the global value chains in the semiconductor industry under digital transformation has not been adequately investigated, although it is a popular topic with the emerging technological rivalry globally. This study empirically examines the following research question to contribute to the limited research. How do firms’ collaborations across regional and national boundaries moderate the effects of open innovation on performance in the semiconductor industry after digital transformation under the decoupling of the global value chain? This study analyses patents which had been registered at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) in the semiconductor industry during 2004 and 2020 at the representative terms of before and after digital transformation. Findings are as follows: First, digital transformation motivates semiconductor enterprises’ collaboration effects over regional and national boundaries. Second, the decoupling of the semiconductor industry in the global value chain negatively moderates the effects of open innovation on firms’ performance across regional and national boundaries. Therefore, by reconstructing the global value chain of the semiconductor industry, the negative moderating effects of the semiconductor industry’s decoupling could be diminished. In addition, by constructing a national semiconductor cluster in South Korea, the benefits of digital transformation in the semiconductor industry could be increased.
AudretschB. D., & BelitskiM. (2023). The limits to open innovation and its impact on innovation performance. Technovation, 119, 102519.
2.
AudretschD. B., BelitskiM., & DesaiS. (2015). Entrepreneurship and economic development in cities. The Annals of Regional Science, 55, 33−60.
3.
BekkhusR. (2016). Do KPIs used by CIOs decelerate digital business transformation? The case of ITIL. DIGIT 2016 Proceedings, p. 16. https://aisel.aisnet.org/digit2016/16
4.
BerghausS., & BackA. (2016). Stages in digital business transformation: Results of an empirical maturity study. MCIS 2016 Proceedings, p. 22. https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2016/22.
5.
BogersM. (2011). The open innovation paradox: Knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European journal of innovation Management, 14(1), 93–117.
6.
BurchardtC., & MaischB. (2019). Digitalization needs a cultural change–examples of applying Agility and Open Innovation to drive the digital transformation. Procedia Cirp, 84, 112−117.
7.
CemernekD., GurschH., & KernR. (2017). Big data as a promoter of industry 4.0: Lessons of the semiconductor industry. 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN).
8.
ChenM.-C., HsiaoY.-H., & HuangH.-Y. (2016). Semiconductor supply chain planning with decisions of decoupling point and VMI scenario. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 47(5), 856–868.
9.
ChenZ., & GuanJ. (2010). The impact of small world on innovation: An empirical study of 16 countries. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1), 97–106.
10.
ChesbroughH. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
11.
CianiA., & NardoM. (2022). The position of the EU in the semiconductor value chain: Evidence on trade, foreign acquisitions, and ownership [JRC Working Papers in Economics and Finance No. 2022/3]. Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
12.
ClarkR., KrepsS., & RaoA. (2023). The political economy of reshoring: Evidence from the semiconductor industry. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/65d64df20aab017d8f9f03e6/t/673cf5516a4acf23d396419b/1732048210118/Reshoring__PLOSOne_Submission__Corrected___Cleaned.pdf.
13.
CloosJ., & MohrS. (2022). Acceptance of data sharing in smartphone apps from key industries of the digital transformation: A representative population survey for Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121459.
14.
CookeP. (2005a). Regional knowledge capabilities and open innovation: Regional innovation systems and clusters in the asymmetric knowledge economy. In BreschiS. & MalerbaF. (Eds.), Clusters, networks, and innovation (p. 499). Oxford University Press.
15.
CookeP. (2005b). Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: Exploring ‘Globalisation 2’—A new model of industry organisation. Research Policy, 34(8), 1128–1149.
16.
de OliveiraL. S., Soares EchevesteM. E., CortimigliaM. N., & GularteA. C. (2019). Open innovation in regional innovation systems: Assessment of critical success factors for implementation in SMEs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 10(4), 1597–1619.
17.
DechezleprêtreA., MénièreY., & MohnenM. (2017). International patent families: From application strategies to statistical indicators. Scientometrics, 111, 793−828.
18.
DosiG. (1984). Technical change and industrial transformation: The theory and an application to the semiconductor industry. Springer.
19.
GaoH., RenM., & ShihT.-Y. (2023). Co-evolutions in global decoupling: Learning from the global semiconductor industry. International Business Review, 32(6), 102118.
20.
GrecoM., GrimaldiM., & CricelliL. (2019). Benefits and costs of open innovation: The BeCO framework. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(1), 53–66.
21.
HsuJ. Y. (2017). State transformation and the evolution of economic nationalism in the East Asian developmental state: The Taiwanese semiconductor industry as case study. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(2), 166–178.
22.
JaffeA. (2002). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. MIT press.
23.
JeongH.-G. (2022). The US-China battle for semiconductor supremacy and reshaping of global supply chain. KIEP Research Paper, World Economy Brief, 22−44.
24.
KaboreF. P., & ParkW. G. (2019). Can patent family size and composition signal patent value?Applied Economics, 51(60), 6476–6496.
25.
KamakuraN. (2022). From globalising to regionalising to reshoring value chains? The case of Japan’s semiconductor industry. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(2), 261–277.
26.
KimY.-H. (2021). Interactions between Japan’s ‘weaponized interdependence’ and Korea’s responses: ‘Decoupling from Japan’ vs. ‘decoupling from Japanese firms’. International Trade, Politics and Development, 5(1), 19–31.
27.
KudryavtsevaS. S., ShinkevichA. I., ShvetsovM. Y., BordonskayaL. A., GorlachevV. P., PersidskayaA. E., & SchepkinaN. K. (2015). National open innovation systems: An evaluation methodology. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(6), 270.
28.
LaursenK., & SalterA. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
29.
LeeM., YunJ. J., PykaA., WonD., KodamaF., SchiumaG., ParkH., JeonJ., ParkK., & JungK. (2018). How to respond to the fourth industrial revolution, or the second information technology revolution? Dynamic new combinations between technology, market, and society through open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 21.
30.
LeeS., LeeH., & LeeC. (2020). Open innovation at the national level: Towards a global innovation system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119842.
31.
LiY. T., HuangM. H., & ChenD. Z. (2011). Semiconductor industry value chain: Characters’ technology evolution. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(3), 370–390.
32.
MalkinA., & HeT. (2024). The geoeconomics of global semiconductor value chains: Extraterritoriality and the US-China technology rivalry. Review of International Political Economy, 31(2), 674–699.
33.
PetersM. A. (2023). Semiconductors, geopolitics and technological rivalry: The US CHIPS & Science Act, 2022. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55, 1642−1646.
34.
Remneland-WikhamnB., & KnightsD. (2012). Transaction cost economics and open innovation: Implications for theory and practice. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(3), 277–289.
35.
RobaeystB., BaccarneB., DuthooW., & SchuurmanD. (2021). The city as an experimental environment: The identification, selection, and activation of distributed knowledge in regional open innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 13(12), 6954.
36.
RobertsoneG., & LapiņaI. (2023). Digital transformation as a catalyst for sustainability and open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100017.
37.
SchmochU. (2008). Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons [Final Report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO)]. WIPO.
38.
SchneiderG., KeilS., & LindnerF. (2021). Benefits of digitalization for business processes in semiconductor manufacturing. 22nd IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).
39.
TanC. L., TeiZ., YeoS. F., LaiK.-H., KumarA., & ChungL. (2023). Nexus among blockchain visibility, supply chain integration and supply chain performance in the digital transformation era. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(1), 229–252.
40.
VertinskyI., KuangY., ZhouD., & CuiV. (2023). The political economy and dynamics of bifurcated world governance and the decoupling of value chains: An alternative perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 54(7), 1351–1377.
41.
VialG. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing Digital Transformation, 28(2), 118–144.
42.
WangS., ShiX., WangT., & HongJ. (2022). Nonlinear spatial innovation spillovers and regional open innovation: Evidence from China. R&D Management, 52(5), 854–876.
43.
WestJ., & GallagherS. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management, 36(3), 319–331.
44.
YunJ. J., JeongE., KimS., AhnH., KimK., HahmS. D., & ParkK. (2021). Collective intelligence: The creative way from knowledge to open innovation. Science, Technology and Society, 26(2), 201–222.
45.
YunJ. J., ZhaoX., JeongE., KimS., KimK., & HahmS. D. (2023). The signal of post catch-up in open innovation dynamics. Science, Technology and Society, 28(2), 151–170.
46.
ZhengD., SongH., ZhaoC., LiuY., & ZhaoW. (2024). Is it possible for semiconductor companies to reduce carbon emissions through digital transformation? Evidence from China. International Journal of Production Economics, 272, 109246.
