The article explores the impact of a government-sponsored microcredit program in India on women’s decision-making powers across different socioreligious communities (SRCs). The article shows that women’s participation in the Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojona (SGSY) has resulted in varied patterns of decision-making across SRCs in four areas chosen for inquiry: (a) money management, (b) food items, (c) use of borrowed money, and (d) kinship and family matters. The likelihood of decisions being taken by “female-only” increased among households participating in SGSY, irrespective of caste and creed, compared to those not participating in it (the control group). However, men continue to take decisions in money management in both the participating and nonparticipating households. In the other three spheres, women of participating households have a greater say as compared to those in the control group.
AckerlyB.A. (1995). Testing the tools of development: Credit programmes, loan involvement and women’s empowerment. IDS Bulletin, 26(3), 56–58.
2.
de AghionA.MorduchJ. (2000). Micro finance beyond group lending. The Economics of Transition, 8(2), 401–420.
3.
AhamedI. (1973). Caste and social stratification among Muslims in India. New Delhi: Manohar Publications.
4.
AgarwalB. (1994). A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AgarwalB. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the house-hold (IFPRI FCND Discussion Paper No. 27). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
6.
AminS.PebleyA.R. (1994). Gender inequality within households: The impact of a women’s development program in 36 Bangladeshi villages. Bangladesh Development Studies, 22(2&3), 121–154.
BanerjeeNirmalaSenJoyanti. (2003). Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana: A budgetary policy in working. New Delhi: United Nation Development Fund for Women.
9.
BhattacharyaJ. (2008, December19). Self help group and capability enhancement: A study in two selected districts in West Bengal. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Jadavpur University, India.
10.
BoundJ.JaegerD.A.BakerR. (1993). The cure can be worse than the disease: A cautionary tale regarding instrumental variables (Technical Paper No. 137). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
11.
Deshmukh-RanadiveJ. (2003). Placing gender equity in the family centre stage: Use of “Kala Jatha” theatre. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(7), 1674–1679.
12.
FieldEricaJayachandranSeemaPandeRohini. (2010). Do traditional institutions constrain female entrepreneurship? A field experiment on business training in India (Working Paper Series No. 36). IFMR Research, Centre for Micro Finance.
13.
GoetzA.M.SenguptaR. (1996). Who takes the credit? Gender power and control over loan use in rural credit programmes in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(1), 45–63.
HolvoetN. (2005). The impact of microfinance on decision-making agency: Evidence from South India. Development and Change, 36(1), 75–102.
16.
KabeerN. (1995). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. London: Verso.
17.
KabeerN. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464.
18.
KabeerN. (2001). Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh. World Development, 29(1), 63–84.
19.
KaziSeema (1999). Muslim women in India. London: Minority Right Group.
20.
KunduA. (2008). Impact of SGSY scheme on self help group members in West Bengal. African Journal of Rural Development, 41(2), 83–104.
21.
LukesS. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
22.
McElroyM. (1992). The policy implications of family bargaining and marriage markets. In HadadL.HoddinotJ.AldermenH. (Eds), Intra house-hold resource allocation in developing countries: Method, model policy (pp. 53–74). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
23.
MencherJoan P. (1988). Women’s work and poverty: Women’s contribution to household maintenance in South India. In DwyerDaisyBruceJudith (Eds), A home divided: Women and income in the Third World. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
MohonV. (2009). Political participation of Muslim women in India. Mumbai: Institute of Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution.
25.
PathakD.C.PantS.K. (2010). Micro finance matters? Impact Evaluation of SGSY: A Case Study of Jaunpur District. Retrieved on April 19, 2011, from http://www.igidr.ac.in
26.
RahamanR.I. (1986). Impact of Grameen Bank on the situation of poor rural women (BIDS Working Paper No. 1). Dhaka, Bangladesh: BIDS.
SchulerR.S.HashemiS.M.BadalS.H. (1998). Men’s violence against women in rural Bangladesh: Undermined or exacerbated by microcredit programmes?Development in Practice, 8(2), 148–157.
29.
SteeleF.AminS.NavedR.T. (2001). Savings/credit group formation and change in empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(4), 635–653.
30.
StolzenbergR.M.RellesD.A. (1997). Tools for intuition about sample selection bias and its correction. American Sociological Review, 62(3): 494–507.
31.
SudNikita. (2003). Experience of SGSY in Gujarat: From process oriented theory to deterministic practice. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(39), 4085–4087.
32.
WaghaB.R.GaikwadJ.H. (2008). Impact of Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojona (SGSY) on the socioeconomic status of beneficiaries and their suggestions from Maharashtra. Agricultural Update, 3(4), 266–268.
