Global Development? Monitored Object(ive)s,Omitted Subject(ivitie)s

Abstract

In this article I critically reflect on the hegemonic modernist framework of development by focusing on its reflection and application in the United Nations’ (UN) Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and practices. Not only do I find it falling short of explaining, understanding or bringing about global development, but quite the opposite, since it feeds into and reproduces the status quo. While I plead for serious (re)definitions, and genuine global commitment towards the (re)solution, of the current micro/macro social problems, which are interdependent and need to be treated in connection and at once, I pick four urgent areas of transformation as sub-topics for the present discussion. They include the (meta)theoretical framework and discourse of development, historical and contextual analyses of diverse human socio-cultural conditions, political will and agency and psychology's contributions within a transdisciplinary participation paradigm. I also briefly hint at various issues from the ‘developing’ context of Turkish society in order to illustrate some of the arguments. It is hoped that the complexity of these issues and widespread inequity problems will no longer be ignored in favour of conventional policies and programmes that are based on the reductionist framework and that truly trans(/post)disciplinary and trans(/post)cultural dialogues will enable new connections, meanings and actions towards desired global transformations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akkoyunlu-Wigley, A. and S. Wigley (2008). Basic education and capability development in Turkey. In A. Nohl , A. Akkoyunlu-Wigley and S. Wigley (eds), Education in Turkey. Munster, pp. 34–47. New York: Waxmann .

Buǧra, A. and C. Keyder (2005). Poverty and social policy in contemporary Turkey. Ankara: UNPD .

Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge .

Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press .

Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

Gülerce, A. (1994). The transformational view of development and the African context . Journal of Psychology in Africa, 12 (2), 22–41 .

Gülerce, A. (1997). Change in the process of change: Coping with indeterminism. In A. Fogel , M.A. Lyra and J. Valsiner (eds), Process of Change and Indeterminism, pp. 39–64. Hillsdale, N.J.: Plenum .

Gülerce, A. (2000). PEACE (Participation in the Eastern Anatolian Cultural Experience). Available at http://www.dakep.boun.edu.tr. Accessed on 14 July 2008.

Gülerce, A. (2009). Transdisciplinarity and transnationalization [in (theoretical) psychology]: Blurring or redefining boundaries and identities (or else)? In T. Teo et al. (eds). Varieties of theoretical psychology: International philosophical and practical concerns, (pp. 113–24). Concord, ON: Captus .

10.

Gülerce, A. (2007a). An alternative narrative of national emancipation and the Turkish experience. In Shi-xu (ed.), Discourse as cultural struggle, pp. 29–46. Aberdeen: Hong Kong University Press .

11.

Gülerce, A. (2007b). Transformational family model and psychological patterns of families in Turkey. İstanbul: BoǧaziÇi University Press .

12.

GüvenÇ. G. (2008). Intra-family representations of Saraycik women in Turkey. Unpublished research report.

13.

Kandiyoti, D. (1995). Patriarchal patterns: notes on the analysis of male dominance in Turkey). In Ş. Tekeli (ed.), Women from the perspective of women in Turkey during 1980s, pp. 38–52. İ.stanbul: İ.letiŞim .

14.

Öztürk, I. (2002). Economic and social issues of east and southeast Turkey: policy implications. Available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1582/. Accessed on 14 July 2008.

15.

Rose, N. (1985). The psychological complex: Psychology, politics and society in England 1869–1939. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .

16.

Sayin, A. (2007). The debate on gender mainstreaming in Turkey. Istanbul: Heinrich BÖll Foundation .

17.

Sachs, J.D. (2006). The end of poverty. London: Penguin Books .

18.

Sen, A.K. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Mass: Harvard Press .

19.

Spivak, G. (1988). In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. London: Routledge .

20.

Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W. W.Norton .

21.

Tekeli, I. (2000). How sincere are we about poverty? Ilhan Tekeli Collected Works II, pp. 123–34. Istanbul: Tarih Vakfi .

22.

Tekeli, I. (2008). What is Turkish modernity like? Paper presented at the Frankfurt Book Fair.

23.

White, J.B. (1994). Money makes us relatives: Women's labor in urban Turkey. Austin: The University of Texas Press .

24.

ZabcÝ, F. (2006). A poverty alleviation programme in Turkey: The social risk mitigation project . South-East Europe Review for Labour and Social Affairs, 1 (1), 109–25 .