Is Public Private Partnership an Effective Alternative to Government in the Provision of Primary Health Care? A Case Study in Odisha

Abstract

Existing public health services are inadequate to cater to the growing demands of quality health care. Public Private Partnership (PPP) has evolved over the last decade as a newer arrangement. This study aimed to understand the breadth and depth of services in primary health centres (PHC) under government (PHC-GOV), NGO (PHC-NGO) and corporate (PHC-COR) management in Kendrapara district of Odisha. One PHC from each model was selected at random. Compliance with Indian Public Health Standards (IPHS), programme performance of last one year and perception of end-users about quality of services were studied. The Government of India (GOI) prescribed IPHS checklist, a performance indicator matrix and a semi-structured interview schedule, respectively, were used for data collection. There were no significant differences in the breadth and depth of services across all three models of PHC management. Comprehensive primary health care including immunization services, health promotion, treatment of common ailments, malaria management and delivery services were almost non-existent in these facilities. PHC-GOV had better accessibility, infrastructure, behaviour of doctors and availability of medicines, whereas laboratory service was better in PHC-NGO and PHC-COR. Human resources and programme performance of last one year was grossly inadequate across all three models. There is no remarkable improvement in the quality of services provided by PPP models. It may not serve as a substitute to inadequate recruitment and retention of staff, erratic programme review and poor capacity building, for attainment of optimal outcomes.

Keywords

Primary health care public private partnership performance evaluation Odisha

References

Baily

M.A.

Bottrell

Lynn

Jennings

(2006). The ethics of using QI methods to improve health care quality and safety. Hastings Center Special Report. Garrison: The Hastings Center.

Bhat

(1999). Characteristics of private medical practice in India: a provider perspective. Health Policy and Planning, 14, 26–37.

Birla

Taneja

(2010). Public private partnerships for healthcare delivery in India. The Internet Journal of World Health and Societal Politics, 7(1). DOI: 10.5580/18c1. Available at http://www.ispub.com/journal/the-internet-journal-of-world-health-and-societal-politics/volume-7-number-1/public-private-partnerships-for-healthcare-delivery-in-india.html

Buse

Waxman

(2001). Public–private health partnerships: a strategy for WHO. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79, 748–54.

Government of India (GOI) (2002): 10th five year plan (2002-2007). Planning Commission of India.

Government of India (GOI) (2007). Report on recommendation of task force on public private partnership for the 11th plan (2007-2012). Planning Commission of India. Report of the PPP sub group on social sector. Government of India, Planning Commission, November, 2004.

Government of India (GOI) (2008). Report of the task force on medical education for the National Rural Health Mission, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

Government of India, Planning Commission (2004). Report of the PPP sub group on social sector. Public Private Partnership. Available at http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/genrep/rep_ppp.pdf Accessed on May 21, 2012.

India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF) (2009). The emerging role of PPP in India health care sector ‘Policy Paper prepared by CII in collaboration with KPMG’. Available at http://www.ibef.org/download/PolicyPaper.pdf Accessed on May 22, 2012.

10.

Indrayan

(2005). Forecasting vascular disease cases and associated mortality in India. Reports of the National Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, India. Available at http://www.whoindia.org/EN/Section102/Section201_888.htm Accessed November 2, 2006.

11.

Mainz

(2003). Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. International Journal for Quality Health Care, 15, 523–30. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg081.

12.

Malmborg

Mann

Thomson

Squire

B.S.

(2006). Can public-private collaboration promote tuberculosis case detection amongst the poor and vulnerable? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 84, 752–58.

13.

Michael A

Stoto

Leon E.

Cosler

(2005). Evaluation of public health interventions. Chapter 18. pp. 495–96. Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

14.

Mukhopadhyay

(2000). Public-Private Partnership in the Health Sector in India. In Wang

(ed.) Public private partnership in the social sector: Issues and country experiences in Asia and the Pacific (pp. 343–56). ADBI Policy Paper No.1, ADBI, Tokyo, Japan.

15.

National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) 60th Report (2004). Report No. 507: Morbidity, Health Care and the Condition of the Aged, January–June, 2004.

16.

Ontario Health Quality Council (OHQC) (2009). Quality improvement guide. Toronto: OHQC.

17.

Orissa Census (2011). Available at http://www.census2011.co.in/census/district/403-kendrapara.html

18.

Pencheon

(2008). The good indicators guide: Understanding how to use and choose indicators. Coventry: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement.

19.

Peters

D.H.

Yazbeck

A.S.

Sharma

R.R.

Ramana

G.N.V.

Pritchett

L.H.

Wagstaff

(2002). Better health systems for India’s poor: Findings, analysis and options. Human Development Network (Health, nutrition, and population series). Washington, DC: World Bank.

20.

United Nations Economic and Social Council (UNESC) (2005). Public-private partnerships (PPPs) for service delivery: Water supply and sanitation. Third meeting of the Committee on Human Development and Civil Society, 4–6 May, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

21.

Widdus

(2003). Public–private partnerships for health require thoughtful evaluation. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81(4), 235.