The objective of this study was to analyze how management practices of human resources (HR) in health can be associated with efficiency in fulfilling the work process of family health teams in primary health care (PHC) strategy adopted in a Brazilian municipality. To do so, were analyzed indicators of HR vis-à-vis an efficiency score obtained from data envelopment analysis (DEA). The analysis model used was based on the dimensions of structure, process as sources of information about the quality of care delivery actions, considering Donabedian’s model of evaluation of health services. The results indicate that investment in training of professionals and fixation of doctors can contribute significantly to improve the efficiency indices obtained by the teams of the city. Despite the advances made in terms of human resource management (HRM) in health, still weigh several challenges for this strategy to be consolidated as a tool to make the Family Health Strategy (FHS) more effectively.
AmadoCarla Alexandra FilipeDysonRobert G. (2008). On comparing the performance of primary care providers. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(3), 915–932.
2.
BuchanJames (2000). Health sector reform and human resources: Lessons from the United Kingdom. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 319–25.
3.
BuchanJames (2004). What difference does (‘good’) HRM make?Human Resources for Health, 7(2), 1–6.
4.
ChenLincolnEvansTimothyAnandSudhirBouffordJo Ivey HilaryChowdhuryMushtaqueCuetoMarcos. (2004). Human resources for health: Overcoming the crisis. Lancet, 364(9449), 1984–1990 (November).
5.
ContandriopoulosA.P.ChampagneE.F.DenisJ.L.PineaultT.R.A, (1997). Avaliação na área da saúde: Conceitos e métodos [An Evaluation in the Field of Health: Concepts and Methods]. In HartzZ.M.A. (org.) (Ed) Avaliação em saúde: Dos modelos conceituais à prática na análise da implantação de programas [Health Evaluation: from conceptual models to practice in the analysis of the program’s implementation], pp. 29–47. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz.
6.
DaviesH.T.O.CrombieI.K. (1997). Interpreting health outcomes. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 3(3), 187–99.
7.
DonabedianAvedis. (1980). The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Volume I. The University of Michigan Health Administration Press Ann Arbor, Michigan.
8.
DonabedianAvedis. (1987). Some basic issues in evaluating the quality of health care. National League for Nursing Publications, G-124(3), 3–28.
9.
FritzenScott A. (2007). Strategic management of the health workforce in developing countries: what have we learned?Human Resources for Health, 5(4), doi:10.1186/1478-4491-5-4.
10.
GarciaF.MarcuelloC.SerranoD.UrbinaO., (1999). Evaluation of efficiency in primary health care centres: An application of data envelopment analysis. Financial Accountability and Management, 15(1), 67–83.
11.
GuestDavid E. (2011). Human resource management and performance: Still searching for some answers. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(1), 3–13.
12.
HuangY.-G.L.MclaughlinC.P., (1989). Relative efficiency in rural primary health care: An application of data envelopment analysis. Health Services Research, 24(2), 143–158.
13.
HurstJ. (2002). Performance measurement and improvement in OECD health systems: overview of issues and challenges. In OECD. Measuring up—improving health system performance in OECD countries. Paris: Editora da OCDE.
KabeneStefane M.OrchardCaroleHowardJohn M.SorianoMark A.LeducRaymond (2006). The importance of human resources management in health care: A global context. Human Resources for Health, 4(20). Available at http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/4/1/20
16.
LerbergheWim VanAdamsOrvill E FerrinhoPaulo. (2002). Human resources impact assessment. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80(7), 525.
17.
MacinkoJamesAlmeidaCélia. (2006). Validação de uma metodologia de avaliação rápida das características organizacionais e do desempenho dos serviços de atenção básica do sistema único de saúde (SUS) em nível local [Validation of a methodology for rapid assessment of organizational characteristics and performance of primary health care services in Brazilian National Health Service (SUS)]. Brasília: Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde [Brasília: Pan American Health Organization].
18.
MendesEugênio Vilaça. (2002). A atenção primária à saúde no SUS. Fortaleza: Escola de Saúde Pública do Ceará [The primary health care in Brazilian National Health Service (SUS)].
19.
NaylorC.DIronK.HandaK. (2002). Measuring Health System performance: Problems and opportunities in the era of assessment and accountability. In OECD. Measuring up—improving health system performance in OECD countries (pp. 13–34). Editora da OCDE, Paris, 2002.
20.
Prefeitura Belo Horizonte. (2008). Avanços e desafios na organização da atenção à saúde em Belo Horizonte.[Advances and challenges in the organization of health care in Belo Horizonte] Secretaria Municipal de Saúde: Organizadora, Maria Aparecida Turci—Belo Horizonte [Organizing, Maria Aparecida Turci — Belo Horizonte: Municipal Health].
21.
Salinas-JimenezJ.SmithP.C. (1996). Data envelopment analysis applied to quality in primary health care. Annals of Operations Research, 67(1), 141–161.
22.
StarfieldBarbara (1992). Primary care: Concept, evaluation, and policy. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
StarfieldBarbara (2002). Atenção primária: equilíbrio entre necessidades de saúde, serviços e tecnologia [Primary care: balancing health needs, services and technology]. Brasília: UNESCO, Ministério da Saúde.
24.
ViacavaFranciscoAlmeidaCéliaCaetanoRosângelaFaustoMárciaMacinkoJamesMartinsMônicaNoronhaJosé Carvalho deNovaesHeligonda Maria DutilhOliveiraEliane dos SantosPortoSilvia MartaSilvaLigia M Vieira daSzwarcwaldCélia Landmann. (2004). Uma metodologia de avaliação do desempenho do sistema de saúde brasileiro[A methodology for assessing the performance of the Brazilian health system]. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, 9(3), 711–724. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232004000300021.
25.
World Health Organization. (2000). World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: World Health Organization.
