Expectant Mother’s Preferences for Services in Public Hospitals of Tamil Nadu,India

Abstract

Substantial programmatic efforts have been undertaken to improve the access to maternal care services in the public health system of India, yet the service users are often regarded as passive recipients. Limited research is available on the preferences of service users on what they regard the greatest issues in service delivery. A hospital-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) has been conducted in the public health facilities of Tamil Nadu, a southern state of India. This study uses a sample of 261 women who came for antenatal check-ups across six different public hospitals in Tamil Nadu. The DCE technique, which is rooted in random utility theory (RUT), and conditional logit model have been used to analyze the relative importance of health service attributes. The result showed that regular ward visits by specialist doctors like obstetricians and gynaecologists (O&G) and paediatricians were the most preferred attribute of the maternal care service. Expectant mothers are willing to wait the maximum and are prepared to tolerate health service characteristics in public hospitals, such as poor patient amenities, poor staff attitude and lack of privacy maintained during physical examination, provided specialist doctors are available in the hospitals.

Keywords

Public hospitals discrete choice experiment Tamil Nadu Health Systems Project

References

Bijlenga

Bonsel

G. J.

Birnie

(2011). Eliciting willingness to pay in obstetrics: Comparing a direct and an indirect valuation method for complex health outcomes. Health Economics, 20(11), 1392–1406.

Cham

Sundby

Vangen

(2009). Availability and quality of emergency obstetric care in Gambia’s main referral hospital: Women-users’ testimonies. Reproductive Health, 6(1), 5.

Chowdhury

Hossain

S. A.

Halim

(2009). Assessment of quality of care in maternal and newborn health services available in public health care facilities in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Medical Research Council Bulletin, 35(2), 53–56.

Das

Agrawal

Agarwal

(2010). Consequences of delay in obstetric care for maternal and perinatal outcomes. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 109(1), 72–73.

Foster

Burgos

Tejada

Cáceres

Altamonte

Perez

Noboa

F.R.M.

Urbaez

M.F.

Heath

Hilliard

R.C.

Chiang

Hall

(2010). A community-based participatory research approach to explore community perceptions of the quality of maternal–newborn health services in the Dominican Republic. Midwifery, 26(5), 504–511.

Gage

A. J.

Calixte

M. G.

(2006). Effects of the physical accessibility of maternal health services on their use in rural Haiti. Population Studies, 60(3), 271–288.

Honda

Randaoharison

P. G.

Matsui

(2011). Affordability of emergency obstetric and neonatal care at public hospitals in Madagascar. Reproductive Health Matters, 19(37), 10–20.

Huber

Zwerina

(1996). The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(3), 307–317.

Hulton

L. A.

Matthews

Stones

R. W.

(2007). Applying a framework for assessing the quality of maternal health services in urban India. Social Science Medicine, 64(10), 2083–2095.

10.

Kabali

Gourbin

De Brouwere

(2011). Complications of childbirth and maternal deaths in Kinshasa hospitals: Testimonies from women and their families. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 11(1), 29.

11.

Kruk

M. E.

Paczkowski

Mbaruku

de Pinho

Galea

(2009). Women’s preferences for place of delivery in rural Tanzania: A population-based discrete choice experiment. American Journal of Public Health, 99(9), 1666–1672.

12.

Lancsar

Louviere

(2006). Deleting irrational ‘responses’ from discrete choice experiments: A case of investigating or imposing preferences? Health Economics, 15(8), 797–811.

13.

Leigh

Mwale

Lazaro

Lunguzi

(2008). Emergency obstetric care: How do we stand in Malawi? International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 101(1), 107–111.

14.

Mangham

L. J.

Hanson

McPake

(2009). How to do (or not to do) … Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy and Planning, 24(2), 151–158.

15.

Mavalankar

D. V.

Rosenfield

(2005). Maternal mortality in resource-poor settings: Policy barriers to care. American Journal of Public Health, 95(2), 200–203. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2003.036715, PMID: 15671450

16.

McFadden

(1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Zarembka

(Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). New York, NY: Academic Publisher.

17.

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW). (2010). Annual report to the people on health. New Delhi: Department of Family Welfare, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

18.

Muraleedharan

V. R.

Dash

Gilson

(2011). Tamil Nadu 1980s–2005: A success story in India. In Balabanova

McKee

A. Mills (Eds), Good health at low cost’ 25 years on: What makes a successful health system? (pp. 159–192). London: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

19.

Onah

H. E.

Ikeako

L. C.

Iloabachie

G. C.

(2006). Factors associated with the use of maternity services in Enugu, Southeastern Nigeria. Social Science and Medicine, 63(7), 1870–1878.

20.

Orme

B. K.

(2006). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison, WI: Research Publishers LLC.

21.

Padmanabhan

Raman

P. S.

Mavalankar

D. V.

(2009). Innovations and challenges in reducing maternal mortality in Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of Health Population and Nutrition, 27(2), 202–219.

22.

Pitchforth

Watson

Tucker

Ryan

van Teijlingen

Farmer

Ireland

Thomson

Kiger

Bryers

(2008). Models of intrapartum care and women’s trade-offs in remote and rural Scotland: A mixed-methods study, BJOG, 115(5), 560–569.

23.

Poornalingam

(1996). Drug management in government sector: The Tamil Nadu model. Essential Drugs Monitor (WHO), 21, 10–11.

24.

Ryan

Gerard

Amaya-Amaya

(2008). Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.

25.

Sample Registration System (SRS). (2011). Bulletin of June 2011. New Delhi: Registrar General India.

26.

Simões

P. P.

Almeida

R. M. V. R

. (2011). Geographic accessibility to obstetric care and maternal mortality in a large metropolitan area of Brazil. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 112(1), 25–29.

27.

StataCorp. (2007). Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station, TX: StataCorpLP.

28.

Street

D. J.

Burgess

(2007). The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: Theory and methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

29.

Tamil Nadu Government Order. (2004). (G.O.2D.No. 42 on August 2, 2004), Family Welfare-Provision of Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care Services (CEmONC)-Identification of Government Hospitals as CEmONC centres-Order Issued.

30.

UNICEF WHO UNFPA AMDD. (2009). Monitoring emergency obstetric care: A handbook. Geneva: WHO.

31.

World Health Organization (WHO). (2009). Safer pregnancy in Tamil Nadu: From vision to reality. New Delhi: WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia.