Documentation Errors and Deficiencies in Medical Records: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Introduction

Identifying errors in documentation can improve the quality of medical records, healthcare services and health care systems, and thus provide a good framework for improvements in documentation policies. To this end, the current research systematically examined studies reporting documentation errors and deficiencies in medical records.

Method

The systematic review was conducted based on PRISMA. Original articles, published in English from January 2009 to April 2019, were retrieved using the Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed and Google Scholar.

Results

A total of 7,624 articles were found. After the exclusion of duplicates and irrelevant items from this total, just 48 articles met the requirements of the study, among which 47 had some sorts of incompleteness; inaccuracy, 14 articles; inconsistency, 8 articles; illegibility, 7 articles; unsigned document, 4 articles and irrelevancy, 2 articles. Factors contributing to the incidence of documentation errors included occupational stressors, manual documentation and absence of or a defect in local, national and international standards or guidelines, with 12, 9 and 11 articles, respectively.

Discussion

Incompleteness, inaccuracy and inconsistency are common errors in medical records documentation. Adopting necessary policies for enhancing the quality of documentation, making strides towards electronic documentation equipped with automatic error detection systems, and standardising the documentation process can be of great assistance in minimising documentation errors and deficiencies.

Keywords

Medical records documentation data quality review documentation errors systematic review

Introduction

Medical records are the main repository of data in healthcare services provided to the patient (Gartee, 2011; Homan, 2007; World Health Organization, 2006). They evolve over time and serve as a valuable reference for legal risk protection, emergency care, research and quality assurance (Gutheil, 2004). It is necessary to pay special attention to the quality of medical record data because of their important roles in healthcare management, providing patient care services, supporting administrative-financial processes and insurance payments, quality assurance and measuring the quality of healthcare services, self-management, education, research, monitoring community health and promoting public health and supporting micro- and macro-policies in the health systems (Department of Health (DH) et al., 2011; Green & Bowie, 2011; Haux et al., 2004; Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety, 2003; Moghaddasi, 2005; Oppenheim, 2012; Wager et al., 2017; World Health Organization, 2003).

The World Health Organization (WHO) has emphasised the importance of the quality of medical record data, which could not only improve the quality of healthcare services but also decrease healthcare costs (World Health Organization, 2006). As also emphasised in the literature, it is important to conduct quality control of medical records in order to enhance the quality of their data (Abdelhak et al., 2007; Huffman, 1994; Moghaddasi, 2005; Skurka, 1998). The quality control process helps healthcare systems to consider and evaluate the documentation patterns of physicians and other healthcare providers and assists administrators in making sure of the presence of data quality (Skurka, 1998). Quality control can also lead to the identification of documentation errors and defects and provide a framework for learning from the errors and deficiencies, thereby improving patient safety (Mitchell, 2008; World Health Organization, 2016).

Improved documentation can lead to the identification of the causes of medical errors and initiation of new ways to prevent them (Chowdhury & Habib, 2015). According to Gurley et al. (2018), after clinical judgment and communication, documentation is one of the most common factors affecting malpractice. According to Gutheil (2004), lack of documentation is a significant breach of and deviation from the standard of care. Jeff (2015) implicitly stated that poor documentation may cause malpractice. Proper documentation can reduce medical errors (Achar & Wu, 2012; Edwards & Moczygemba, 2004; Scott, 2013). Chang et al. (2005), in the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organisations (JCAHO) Patient Safety Event Taxonomy, considered three levels for medical errors, known as communication, patient management and clinical performance. They also implicitly referred to documenting errors and deficiencies under the communication level. Because of the importance of communication in promoting patient safety, communication improvement has always been highlighted in the patient safety goals of the Joint Commission (Rodziewicz & Hipskind, 2019). Therefore, proper documentation of medical records, as the most important communication tool of healthcare teams, can lead to better communication and, consequently, improved patient safety.

Given the importance of documentation errors, the identification of these errors is crucial because error detection can lead to improved quality of medical records, healthcare services and health care systems, and it also provides a good framework for learning and modifying documentation policies. According to WHO, learning from errors, especially if considered at the organisational level, can be very productive (World Health Organization, 2016). To this end, this study attempted to systematically review studies that reported documentation errors by performing quantitative and qualitative analyses of medical record data.

Method and Design

In this study, documentation errors were defined as any error or deficiency in recording data in medical record, which could affect the main aspects of information quality and result in poor documentation.

The Prisma guideline (Page et al., 2021) was utilized for reporting this systematic review.

Data Sources and Searches

This study used the most popular data sources, that is, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed and Google Scholar, to retrieve peer-reviewed articles indexed from 2009 to 14/4/2019. In order to formulate a comprehensive search strategy, first, the equivalent terms for the main concepts were identified by referring to the literature and using MeSH and EMTREE thesauri, and consulting with experts. Truncation and wild cards were employed for searching different forms of the words. In order to construct the search strategies, truncation and wild cards, field tags for title, abstract, keyword, MeSH term, EMTREE term, as well as Boolean logical operators, were used according to databases’ instructions. The search strategies for the data sources can be found in Table A1.

Study Selection

The retrieved articles were imported into Mendeley software to identify and remove duplications. Duplicate articles that were not identified by the software in this step were identified and eliminated in the first phase of screening. In the first phase, the articles were screened by title and abstract, and in the second phase, by full text. In the first phase, only original research articles published from 2009 till the time of search time, in the form of journal articles, were included. In the second phase of screening, the full text of articles published in English was selected. In terms of study design, all studies that retrospectively or prospectively reviewed the data of medical records and reported documentation errors with regard to the information quality dimensions of medical records were included. In both phases, two researchers independently screened the documents to identify eligible articles based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved through the involvement of a third researcher or consensus-based discussion. The quality of the articles was assessed by three researchers on the basis of the STROBE checklist (STROBE Statement, 2007).

Data Extraction

In this stage, the characteristics of the eligible articles and data with regard to the research question were extracted. For each article, the following data elements were extracted and recorded in the two tables designed for this purpose, as follows:

[F]irst author; publication year; the country where the research was conducted; type of study; sample; setting; documentation errors and deficiencies; factors affecting the documentation errors and deficiencies; suggested solutions.

The extracted data were analysed by content and then categorised. In terms of research method, the studies were categorised into classes such as prospective review, retrospective review, goal-based evaluative study and criterion-based evaluative study. In order to categorise the documentation errors and deficiencies, the most common quality dimensions mentioned in the literature were used (Chen, Hailey, et al., 2014; Chen, Yu, et al., 2014; Davoudi et al., 2015; Kahn et al., 2016; Moghaddasi & Rahimi, 2016; Wager et al., 2017; Weiskopf & Weng, 2013). Additional categories were defined and then classified in order to categorise factors contributing to the emergence of errors and to present the suggested solutions for minimising document problems.

Results

As shown in Figure 1, 7,590 articles were found based on the search strategy. Added to these were 34 additional articles found by conducting a manual search into the articles suggested in the databases and references of the eligible articles. The articles left for analysis, after removing the duplicates, were 4,657 in total. After screening this total (i.e., 4,657 articles) by title and abstract, 117 articles entered the full-text screening phase. By eliminating the unrelated articles and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, just 48 eligible articles were left to be analysed.

Figure 1.

Source: Page et al. (2021).

According to Table 1, showing the characteristics of the studies, 10 (out of 48) articles were conducted in the United States, six in Australia, with one in collaboration with New Zealand; three in Norway and Sweden; two in the Netherlands, Switzerland, Ireland, Iran, Canada and Jamaica; and one article in the United Kingdom, Vietnam, Iceland, Germany, Nigeria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Finland, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, India, Malawi and Ghana.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Included Studies.

Authors	Publication year	Country	Type of Study	Number of medical records	Setting
A. P. Abernethy et al.	2009	USA	Goal- based evaluative study (goal: the adequacy of information for calculating the quality metrics) Retrospective review	499 medical records	13 community and academic Oncology sites
P. Frei et al.	2009	Switzerland	Comparative study (comparing the drug lists) Prospective review	103 drug lists of patients who were electively admitted for coronary angiography	University hospital
T. T. Hong et al.	2009	Vietnam	Goal- based evaluative study (goal: the adequacy of information for coding with icd-10) Retrospective review	205 medical records	General hospital
A. K. Mishra et al.	2009	Nepal	Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: the discharge summary format of the hospital) Retrospective review	130 discharge summaries	Tertiary hospital
J. G. Samuels et al.	2009	USA	Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: the Samuels’ pain management documentation Rating scale (SPMDRS); joint commission standards) [Prospective review]	340 medical records	2 university hospitals
J. Callen et al.	2009	Australia	Comparative study (comparing manual and electronic documentation)	966 handwritten and 842 electronically generated Discharge summaries	University hospital
J. Gartlan et al.	2010	Australia	Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: the Australian Wound Management Association Standard (AWMA)) Retrospective Review	49 progress notes of acute inpatients	Regional public hospital
E. R. Gjevjon et al.	2010	Norway	Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: the nursing process; The VIPS model (an acronym for the nursing key concept comprising Wellbeing, Integrity, Prevention and Security) Retrospective review	91 patient records	Nursing home
W. Paans et al.	2010	Netherlands	Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: D-CATCH instrument) Retrospective Review	341 medical records	10 general hospitals and university hospitals
J. Simons et al.	2010	UK	Comparative study (comparing the documents of 2 hospitals) Retrospective Review	175 children’s prescription charts in medical records	General and special hospitals
S. Bergrath et al.	2011	Germany	Goal-based evaluative study *(Goal: adequacy of data for calculating MEES and RTS (emergency scores)) Retrospective review	4815 paper-based protocols were documented by 43 different emergency medical service physicians	University hospital
C. E. Deremer et al.	2011	USA	Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) recommended guidelines) Retrospective review	19 medical records of active patients in the CCC with a current opioid contract and opioid prescriptions	Academic continuity of care medicine clinic
M. A. Gershater et al.	2011	Sweden	Goal- based evaluative study (Goal: the adequacy of information to provide health care (metabolic control, treatment and prevention of complications) [prospective review]	172 patient records	Nursing home
M. J. Hartel et al.	2011	Switzerland	Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: the standardised medication documentation process of the institute) Retrospective review	167 patient histories	University hospital
M. Iqbal et al.	2011	Ireland	Goal- based evaluative study (Goal: the adequacy of information to provide health care) Retrospective review	The hospital notes and letters of 100 patients	University hospital
T. Jonson et al.	2011	Iceland	Goal- based evaluative study (Goal: adequacy of information for calculating Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS)) Retrospective review	65 medical records	University hospital
J. A. Jordan O’Brien, et al.	2011	Ireland	Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP)) Retrospective review	85 nursing records	University hospital
L. Salazar et al.	2011	Canada	Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: the elements of the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR)) Retrospective study	700 chart	Emergency department of a trauma centre
IT. Adeleke et al.	2012	Nigeria	Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: WHO guideline: improving data quality: a guide for developing countries) Retrospective review	780 paper-based health records	Tertiary hospital
L. Barton et al.	2012	Australia and New Zealand	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the Australian National Inpatient Medication Chart (ANIMC)) Prospective review	715 medication charts (first 24 hours of a general medical patient’s hospital admission)	4 public or private acute care hospitals
R. Duszak et al.	2012	USA	Goal- based evaluative study (Goal: the adequacy of information for coding with CPT) Retrospective review	336,062 abdominal ultrasound reports	Multi-institutional coding and billing database
K. Legault et al.	2012	Canada	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the Joint Commission for hospital accreditation) Retrospective review	90 discharge summaries	University hospitals
Ziauddin	2012	Pakistan	Comparative study (Comparing results of re-audit with first audit) [Retrospective review]	200 medical records	University hospital
EI. Broughton et al.	2013	Afghanistan	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: guidelines for vaginal delivery by the Afghanistan Ministry of Public Health) [prospective review]	600 medical records	3 hospitals (one maternity hospital and maternity departments of 2 hospitals)
E. Lovestam et al.	2013	Sweden	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the instrument “Diet-NCP-Audit”) Retrospective review	147 dietetic notes	4 hospitals and six primary care centers
E.W . Tan et al.	2013	USA	Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: the data elements of the Trauma Centre’s database)— Retrospective review	114 handwritten admission and daily progress notes	University hospital
J. Asamani et al.	2014	Ghana	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the best practice guidelines from NMC (2010), CRNBC (2007)) Retrospective review	100 medical records	2 district hospitals
J. Cunningham et al.	2014	Australia	Goal- based evaluative study (Goal: the adequacy information for coding with ICD-10-AM) [Retrospective review]	100 medical records	University hospital
K. Häyrinen et al.	2014	Finland	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the framework of the reference standard based on earlier studies) Retrospective review	1,364 physiotherapists’ notes	Central hospital
J. Morphet et al.	2014	Australia	Goal- based evaluative study (Goal: adequacy of information for providing health care in the emergency department)	408 records of residents transferred from Residential Aged Care Facilities (RACF) to Emergency Department Retrospective review	Emergency department
G. P. Quinn	2015	USA	Descriptive study [prospective review]	231 medical records of adolescent and young adult oncology patients (All documents were reviewed before the initiation of treatment)	4 cancer centre institutions
O. A. Salem et al.	2015	Kingdom of Saudi Arabia	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: standards of Patient Medical Record Content (PMRC)) [prospective review]	28 medical records	Tertiary hospital
Z. Asghari et al.	2016	Iran	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the hospital’s forms) [Retrospective review]	281 medical records	5 university hospitals
S. Chaturvedi et al.	2016	India	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the tool based on the EngenderHealth guide for assessment of facility records) Retrospective study	1239 obstetric records	73 primary, secondary, and tertiary level facilities implementing JSY cash transfer program
R-L. Hansen et al.	2016	Norway	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Form and The Braden Scale) Retrospective review	155 patients ‘records	5 nursing homes
J. Lindo et al.	2016	Jamaica	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: audit tool for nurses’ documentation of the ministry of health Jamaica) [Retrospective review]	245 medical records	3 public hospitals
B. M. Saravi et al.	2016	Iran	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the hospital’s forms) [Retrospective review]	381 medical records	University hospitals
R. Walley et al.	2016	USA	Interventional study /Comparative study (comparing before and after implementing her) Retrospective review	A total of 720 medical records were reviewed with 10,176 orders before intervention and 11,455 orders after.	A community hospital system including 2 hospitals
E. D. Cook et al.	2017	USA	Descriptive study [Prospective review]	800 patient medical records of breast cancer survivors	The breast cancer survivorship clinic
B. H. Garcia et al.	2017	Norway	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: Norwegian quality criteria) [Retrospective review]	60 discharge summaries	A rural hospital
N. Skyttberg et al.	2017	Sweden	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: a specified dataset) [Retrospective review]	335027 emergency care visits in different types of documentation (paper-based; mixed and electronic)	5 emergency hospitals
A. Tuinman et al.	2017	Netherlands	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: D-CATCH instrument) Retrospective review	197 care plans	5 long-term institutional care facilities
N. Nyamulani et al.	2018	Malawi	Interventional study (Intervention: dissemination of results of the first audit and educating adherence of standard guideline) Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) Good Surgical Practice guidelines) Prospective review	563 handwritten operative notes	Central hospital
Y. B. Woldegerima et al.	2018	Ethiopia	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the indicators in the modified Global Quality Index (GQI)) [Retrospective review]	122 pre-anaesthetic evaluation tools	University hospital
K. Abdul-Kareem et al.	2019	Jamaica	Criteria based evaluative study (Criteria: the audit instrument was developed based on the Ministry of Health, Jamaica guidelines) [Retrospective review]	131 medical records of patients with chronic diseases	University hospital
M. Rose et al.	2019	USA	Goal- based evaluative study (Goal: the adequacy information for providing health care) Criteria- based evaluative study (Criteria: Emergency Medical Treatment And Active Labor Act (EMTALA)) Retrospective review	287 medical records of inter-hospital transferred patients with acute aortic dissection	University hospital
A. K. Sowan et al.	2019	USA	Criteria-based evaluative study (Criteria: the best practices/ the unit policies and procedures/ the glucometer’s user manual study) Retrospective review	5049 blood glucose tests	University hospital
J. Steel et al.	2019	Australia	Descriptive study Qualitative content analysis Retrospective review	906 progress note entries patient with communication disability	2 regional hospitals

In terms of the study type, the majority of the articles derived from evaluative studies: 30 were criterion-based, nine were goal-based and one used both approaches. Five articles were comparative studies, with two of them comparing sample populations and the third comparing manual and electronic documentation. One of the comparative studies compared the current study’s audit with the audit carried out five years ago, and another conducted a before–after study and compared the results prior to and after the implementation of electronic health record (EHR). Also, 41 articles were retrospective reviews, and seven articles were prospective reviews. University hospitals, general hospitals and special hospitals were the settings where 35 articles came from; long-term facilities were the setting of four articles; and clinics, emergency centres and other ambulatory care centres were the setting of six articles. The setting of two articles was both hospitals and ambulatory centres. In one case, the patients’ medical records that were sent from the long-term care centre to the emergency department were reviewed.

The data extracted are presented in Table 2, showing documentation errors and deficiencies, factors contributing to such errors and the recommendations made.

Table 2.

Documentation Errors and Deficiencies, Contributing Factors and Suggested Solutions.

Documentation Errors and Deficiencies	Studies	Factors Affecting Documentation Errors and Deficiencies	Suggested Solutions
Incompleteness	(Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Abernethy et al., 2009; Adeleke et al., 2012; Asamani et al., 2014; Asghari et al., 2016; Barton et al., 2012; Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Chaturvedi et al., 2016; Cook et al., 2017; Cunningham et al., 2014; Deremer et al., 2011; Duszak et al., 2012; Frei et al., 2009; Garcia et al., 2017; Gartlan et al., 2010; Gershater et al., 2011; Gjevjon & Hellesø, 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Hartel et al., 2011; Häyrinen, 2014; Hong et al., 2009; Iqbal et al., 2011; Jonsson et al., 2011; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Lindo et al., 2016; Lövestam et al., 2013; Mishra et al., 2009; Morphet et al., 2014; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Paans et al., 2010; Quinn et al., 2015; Rose et al., 2019; Salazar et al., 2011; Salem et al., 2015; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Saravi et al., 2016; Simons, 2009; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Sowan et al., 2019; Steel et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2013; Tuinman et al., 2017; Walley et al., 2016; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019; Ziauddin et al., 2012)	Healthcare practitioners: nurses (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Asamani et al., 2014; Asghari et al., 2016; Frei et al., 2009; Gartlan et al., 2010; Gershater et al., 2011; Gjevjon & Hellesø, 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Hong et al., 2009; Jonsson et al., 2011; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Lindo et al., 2016; Paans et al., 2010; Salazar et al., 2011; Salem et al., 2015; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Simons, 2009) Physicians (Asghari et al., 2016; Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Deremer et al., 2011; Frei et al., 2009; Gartlan et al., 2010; Hong et al., 2009; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Salazar et al., 2011; Salem et al., 2015; Simons, 2009) Medical students (Callen et al., 2010; Legault et al., 2012; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Tan et al., 2013; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019) Other (Cunningham et al., 2014; Duszak et al., 2012; Häyrinen, 2014; Rose et al., 2019) Not specified (Abernethy et al., 2009; Adeleke et al., 2012; Barton et al., 2012; Chaturvedi et al., 2016; Cook et al., 2017; Hartel et al., 2011; Iqbal et al., 2011; Morphet et al., 2014; Quinn et al., 2015; Saravi et al., 2016; Steel et al., 2019; Ziauddin et al., 2012)	Adopting policies to improve documentation process (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Abernethy et al., 2009; Adeleke et al., 2012; Asamani et al., 2014; Asghari et al., 2016; Barton et al., 2012; Broughton et al., 2013; Chaturvedi et al., 2016; Cook et al., 2017; Deremer et al., 2011; Frei et al., 2009; Gartlan et al., 2010; Gershater et al., 2011; Gjevjon & Hellesø, 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Hartel et al., 2011; Iqbal et al., 2011; Jonsson et al., 2011; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Lindo et al., 2016; Morphet et al., 2014; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Quinn et al., 2015; Salem et al., 2015; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Saravi et al., 2016; Simons, 2009; Sowan et al., 2019; Tuinman et al., 2017; Ziauddin et al., 2012) Using or improving electronic documentation systems (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Frei et al., 2009; Garcia et al., 2017; Hartel et al., 2011; Iqbal et al., 2011; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Steel et al., 2019; Walley et al., 2016; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019) Modifying or developing or using local, national, or international standards or guidelines (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Asamani et al., 2014; Cunningham et al., 2014; Deremer et al., 2011; Duszak et al., 2012; Frei et al., 2009; Gartlan et al., 2010; Gjevjon & Hellesø, 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Häyrinen, 2014; Hong et al., 2009; Jonsson et al., 2011; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Lövestam et al., 2013; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Rose et al., 2019; Salem et al., 2015; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Steel et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2013; Tuinman et al., 2017; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019)
Inaccuracy	(Adeleke et al., 2012; Barton et al., 2012; Broughton et al., 2013; Callen et al., 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Hartel et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Lövestam et al., 2013; Paans et al., 2010; Simons, 2009; Sowan et al., 2019; Steel et al., 2019; Tuinman et al., 2017; Walley et al., 2016)
Inconsistency	(Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Deremer et al., 2011; Frei et al., 2009; Häyrinen, 2014; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Simons, 2009; Steel et al., 2019)
Illegibility	(Asamani et al., 2014; Barton et al., 2012; Hartel et al., 2011; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Simons, 2009; Walley et al., 2016)
Unsigned	(Adeleke et al., 2012; Asamani et al., 2014; Barton et al., 2012; Walley et al., 2016)	Occupational stressors (Asamani et al., 2014; Barton et al., 2012; Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Gartlan et al., 2010; Hong et al., 2009; Iqbal et al., 2011; Jonsson et al., 2011; Rose et al., 2019; Salazar et al., 2011; Sowan et al., 2019; Tuinman et al., 2017) Manual documentation or lack of electronic documentation (Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Garcia et al., 2017; Hartel et al., 2011; Mishra et al., 2009; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Sowan et al., 2019; Walley et al., 2016; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019) Deficiency or lack of local, national, or international standards or guidelines (Asamani et al., 2014; Deremer et al., 2011; Häyrinen, 2014; Hong et al., 2009; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Lövestam et al., 2013; Rose et al., 2019; Salazar et al., 2011; Steel et al., 2019; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019)	Establishing educational and training programs (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Adeleke et al., 2012; Asamani et al., 2014; Barton et al., 2012; Chaturvedi et al., 2016; Cook et al., 2017; Deremer et al., 2011; Duszak et al., 2012; Gershater et al., 2011; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Häyrinen, 2014; Hong et al., 2009; Jonsson et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Lindo et al., 2016; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Quinn et al., 2015; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Saravi et al., 2016; Simons, 2009; Steel et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2013; Tuinman et al., 2017; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019; Ziauddin et al., 2012)
Untimeliness	(Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Skyttberg et al., 2017)
Irrelevancy	(Legault et al., 2012; Skyttberg et al., 2017)

Incompleteness was present in all of the examined articles except for one (Broughton et al., 2013). A closer review of studies evaluating data adequacy and sufficiency revealed recurring issues with incomplete data. Four studies (Gershater et al., 2011; Iqbal et al., 2011; Morphet et al., 2014; Rose et al., 2019) identified gaps in healthcare service data provided to patients. Two studies (Bergrath et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 2015) found problems in calculating indices necessary for patient care, while one study (Abernethy et al., 2009) highlighted issues in computing care quality indices. Additionally, three studies (Cunningham et al., 2014; Duszak et al., 2012; Hong et al., 2009) reported coding-related challenges. In all criterion-based evaluations, data incompleteness was the most common documentation error and the main cause of the incompatibility of medical records with the intended criteria (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Adeleke et al., 2012; Asamani et al., 2014; Asghari et al., 2016; Barton et al., 2012; Broughton et al., 2013; Chaturvedi et al., 2016; Deremer et al., 2011; Garcia et al., 2017; Gartlan et al., 2010; Gjevjon & Hellesø, 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Hartel et al., 2011; Häyrinen, 2014; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Lindo et al., 2016; Lövestam et al., 2013; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Paans et al., 2010; Salazar et al., 2011; Salem et al., 2015; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Saravi et al., 2016; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Sowan et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2013; Tuinman et al., 2017; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019). Inaccuracy was also reported in 14 studies (Adeleke et al., 2012; Barton et al., 2012; Broughton et al., 2013; Callen et al., 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Hartel et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Lövestam et al., 2013; Paans et al., 2010; Simons, 2009; Sowan et al., 2019; Steel et al., 2019; Tuinman et al., 2017; Walley et al., 2016), inconsistency in eight (Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Deremer et al., 2011; Frei et al., 2009; Häyrinen, 2014; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Simons, 2009; Steel et al., 2019), illegibility in seven (Asamani et al., 2014; Barton et al., 2012; Hartel et al., 2011; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Simons, 2009; Walley et al., 2016), unsigned document in four (Adeleke et al., 2012; Asamani et al., 2014; Barton et al., 2012; Walley et al., 2016) and irrelevancy in two studies (Legault et al., 2012; Skyttberg et al., 2017).

In 17 studies, documentation errors and deficiencies were related to nurses (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Asamani et al., 2014; Asghari et al., 2016; Frei et al., 2009; Gartlan et al., 2010; Gershater et al., 2011; Gjevjon & Hellesø, 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Hong et al., 2009; Jonsson et al., 2011; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Lindo et al., 2016; Paans et al., 2010; Salazar et al., 2011; Salem et al., 2015; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Simons, 2009; Sowan et al., 2019; Tuinman et al., 2017), in 12 studies to physicians (Asghari et al., 2016; Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Deremer et al., 2011; Frei et al., 2009; Gartlan et al., 2010; Hong et al., 2009; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Salazar et al., 2011; Salem et al., 2015; Simons, 2009), in five studies to medical students (Callen et al., 2010; Legault et al., 2012; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Tan et al., 2013; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019), and in four studies to other members of the healthcare team (Cunningham et al., 2014; Duszak et al., 2012; Häyrinen, 2014; Rose et al., 2019), while some other studies did not mention any specific healthcare practitioner (Abernethy et al., 2009; Adeleke et al., 2012; Barton et al., 2012; Chaturvedi et al., 2016; Cook et al., 2017; Hartel et al., 2011; Iqbal et al., 2011; Morphet et al., 2014; Quinn et al., 2015; Saravi et al., 2016; Steel et al., 2019; Ziauddin et al., 2012). One study also noted the documentation errors of the patient’s previous healthcare team (nursing home).

Occupational stressors, including workload, shortage/absence of specialised human force, time limitations, shift rotations and communication problems between different units, contributed to the incidence of documentation errors and deficiencies (Asamani et al., 2014; Barton et al., 2012; Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Gartlan et al., 2010; Hong et al., 2009; Iqbal et al., 2011; Jonsson et al., 2011; Rose et al., 2019; Salazar et al., 2011; Sowan et al., 2019; Tuinman et al., 2017). Manual documentation or lack of electronic documentation were factors mentioned in these studies as influencing the incidence of documentation errors (Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Garcia et al., 2017; Hartel et al., 2011; Mishra et al., 2009; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Sowan et al., 2019; Walley et al., 2016; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019). Absence of or a defect in local, national and international standards or guidelines was another factor predisposing those in charge of documentation to documentation errors (Asamani et al., 2014; Deremer et al., 2011; Häyrinen, 2014; Hong et al., 2009; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Lövestam et al., 2013; Rose et al., 2019; Salazar et al., 2011; Steel et al., 2019; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019).

The examined studies recommended adopting new policies to improve the documentation process (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Abernethy et al., 2009; Adeleke et al., 2012; Asamani et al., 2014; Asghari et al., 2016; Barton et al., 2012; Broughton et al., 2013; Chaturvedi et al., 2016; Cook et al., 2017; Deremer et al., 2011; Frei et al., 2009; Gartlan et al., 2010; Gershater et al., 2011; Gjevjon & Hellesø, 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Hartel et al., 2011; Iqbal et al., 2011; Jonsson et al., 2011; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Lindo et al., 2016; Morphet et al., 2014; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Quinn et al., 2015; Salem et al., 2015; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Saravi et al., 2016; Simons, 2009; Sowan et al., 2019; Tuinman et al., 2017; Ziauddin et al., 2012), using electronic documentation systems or improving the existing systems (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Frei et al., 2009; Garcia et al., 2017; Hartel et al., 2011; Iqbal et al., 2011; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Steel et al., 2019; Walley et al., 2016; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019), modifying, creating, or using local, national, and international standards and guidelines (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Asamani et al., 2014; Cunningham et al., 2014; Deremer et al., 2011; Duszak et al., 2012; Frei et al., 2009; Gartlan et al., 2010; Gjevjon & Hellesø, 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Häyrinen, 2014; Hong et al., 2009; Jonsson et al., 2011; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Lövestam et al., 2013; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Rose et al., 2019; Salem et al., 2015; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Steel et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2013; Tuinman et al., 2017; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019) and offering educational courses (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Adeleke et al., 2012; Asamani et al., 2014; Barton et al., 2012; Chaturvedi et al., 2016; Cook et al., 2017; Deremer et al., 2011; Duszak et al., 2012; Gershater et al., 2011; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Häyrinen, 2014; Hong et al., 2009; Jonsson et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Lindo et al., 2016; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Quinn et al., 2015; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Saravi et al., 2016; Simons, 2009; Steel et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2013; Tuinman et al., 2017; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019; Ziauddin et al., 2012).

Discussion

Incompleteness in medical records was detected in the majority of the articles examined in this study. Many studies have cast doubt on the generalisability of their results due to, among others, limitations in the studied population (Abernethy et al., 2009; Adeleke et al., 2012; Callen et al., 2010; Cook et al., 2017; Garcia et al., 2017; Gjevjon & Hellesø, 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Hartel et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Lindo et al., 2016; Mishra et al., 2009; Quinn et al., 2015; Rose et al., 2019; Salazar et al., 2011; Salem et al., 2015; Simons, 2009; Tan et al., 2013), the retrospective review nature of the studies (Abernethy et al., 2009; Bergrath et al., 2011; Deremer et al., 2011; Duszak et al., 2012; Hartel et al., 2011; Jonsson et al., 2011; Mishra et al., 2009; Morphet et al., 2014; Salazar et al., 2011; Simons, 2009; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Sowan et al., 2019), and shortcomings in methods, data collection procedures and research instruments (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Duszak et al., 2012; Frei et al., 2009; Garcia et al., 2017; Gershater et al., 2011; Hartel et al., 2011; Häyrinen, 2014; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Mishra et al., 2009; Tuinman et al., 2017). Yet, incomplete documentation is doubtless a major problem in the patient medical record documentation process (Asakura et al., 2014). Lack/absence of documentation, insufficient documentation in justifying the need for the delivered healthcare services, incorrect coding and other errors are the main error categories of the CERT program cited by The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2016). According to Karp et al. (2008), many lawsuits related to medical errors were lost due to the low quality of medical records, insufficiency of data and indefensibility of the records, even when appropriate healthcare services have been offered to the patient. Edwards believes that ‘better documentation can reduce medical errors’ (Edwards & Moczygemba, 2004).

Unsigned document and unspecified identification of the healthcare provider, observed in four studies, may be due to the healthcare providers’ reluctance to take full responsibility for care (Adeleke et al., 2012). Still, they pose major problems for healthcare service organisations and teams. In an examination developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, unreliable medical records, due to lack of necessary signatures or illegible signatures and incomplete medical records, were the most important documentation errors leading to loss of payment lawsuits (The Medicare Learning Network, 2017). Illegibility of the contents of the medical records, especially the illegibility of doctors’ handwriting, could also contribute to the incidence of medical errors (Edwards & Moczygemba, 2004). Edwards believes that diagnosing and ordering errors can be caused by unavailable patient healthcare data and illegible handwriting (Edwards & Moczygemba, 2004).

Identification of incompleteness, illegibility and unsigned documentation requires quantitative analyses. Since some errors related to incompleteness, illegibility and unsigned documentation can be resolved, it seems that simultaneous quantitative analyses may help in the timely identification of these errors, thereby improving the patient’s medical records and preventing unfavourable outcomes (Abdelhak et al., 2007; Huffman, 1994; Moghaddasi, 2005; Skurka, 1998; World Health Organization, 2003).

Clarity and accuracy have the highest degree of importance for effective communication between healthcare team members and patients (Abdelrahman & Abdelmageed, 2014). Therefore, the accuracy of medical record data in any healthcare centre is a necessity for the provision of care to patients (Lindh et al., 2013). As a result, the inaccuracy reported in 14 studies disrupted effective communication between healthcare teams, thereby threatening the process of patient care. The inconsistency reported in eight articles demonstrates heterogeneity in data. Documentation errors such as inaccuracy, inconsistency and irrelevancy can be identified in the process of medical record qualitative analysis but cannot always be resolved, especially because qualitative analysis is often performed after quantitative analysis and in a retrospective manner (Abdelhak et al., 2007; Huffman, 1994; Moghaddasi, 2005; Skurka, 1998).

According to Ross Koppel, 70% of medical records contain errors (Farr, 2018). Errors in medical records may lead to medical errors (Adane et al., 2019). Lack of recording or erroneous recording of necessary data in medical records can have adverse consequences, especially if this leads to an inaccurate diagnosis or inappropriate treatment plan (Lippincott Nursing Education, 2018). Many common medical documentation errors may be disastrous, sometimes leading to patient mortality. Poor documentation may affect budget distribution, epidemiological variables, research and research investment, communication among the healthcare team members, care quality evaluation, ranking of hospitals, services, and individuals, and even hospital bills (Asakura et al., 2014). Therefore, it is essential to identify factors contributing to documentation errors.

Human factors are important factors in the incidence of medical errors (Rodziewicz & Hipskind, 2019). In some of the examined studies, documentation errors were the result of a lack of knowledge and awareness (Barton et al., 2012; Deremer et al., 2011; Hong et al., 2009), low priority in the documentation (Bergrath et al., 2011; Gartlan et al., 2010), evasion of responsibility (Adeleke et al., 2012) and lack of physical well-being of the person in charge of documentation (Callen et al., 2010). However, one must not overlook the share of difficulties related to systems and processes in providing the conditions for documentation errors.

Manual documentation and absence of electronic documentation systems (Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Garcia et al., 2017; Hartel et al., 2011; Mishra et al., 2009; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Sowan et al., 2019; Walley et al., 2016; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019), absence, deficiency or non-use of standards and guidelines (Asamani et al., 2014; Deremer et al., 2011; Häyrinen, 2014; Hong et al., 2009; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Lövestam et al., 2013; Rose et al., 2019; Salazar et al., 2011; Steel et al., 2019; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019), and factors such as workload, shortage of or absence of specialised human force, with time limitations (Asamani et al., 2014; Barton et al., 2012; Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Hong et al., 2009; Jonsson et al., 2011; Rose et al., 2019; Salazar et al., 2011; Sowan et al., 2019; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019), shift rotations (Tuinman et al., 2017) and lack of effective communication between different units (Gartlan et al., 2010) are referred to in some of the reviewed articles as factors influencing the incidence of documentation errors. These factors could lead not only to documentation errors but also medical errors if they are not identified and controlled. Therefore, given the effectiveness of Root Causes Analysis tool in the prevention of medical errors (Charles et al., 2016, 2017), this tool can also be used in the case of documentation errors in order to identify the causes of errors and find solutions to resolve these problems.

Calculated policy-making and modification of processes for improving medical record documentation at both small and large scale are solutions recommended by many studied articles (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Abernethy et al., 2009; Adeleke et al., 2012; Asamani et al., 2014; Asghari et al., 2016; Barton et al., 2012; Broughton et al., 2013; Chaturvedi et al., 2016; Cook et al., 2017; Deremer et al., 2011; Frei et al., 2009; Gartlan et al., 2010; Gershater et al., 2011; Gjevjon & Hellesø, 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Hartel et al., 2011; Iqbal et al., 2011; Jonsson et al., 2011; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Lindo et al., 2016; Morphet et al., 2014; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Quinn et al., 2015; Salem et al., 2015; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Saravi et al., 2016; Simons, 2009; Sowan et al., 2019; Tuinman et al., 2017; Ziauddin et al., 2012). Using electronic documentation systems (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Frei et al., 2009; Garcia et al., 2017; Hartel et al., 2011; Iqbal et al., 2011; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Steel et al., 2019; Walley et al., 2016; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019) or upgrading the existing systems (Bergrath et al., 2011; Callen et al., 2010; Deremer et al., 2011; Häyrinen, 2014; Paans et al., 2010; Salazar et al., 2011; Simons, 2009; Sowan et al., 2019; Tuinman et al., 2017) are some other solutions proposed in these studies. In a review study, Adane concluded that poor medical data processing systems are the main cause of medical errors (Adane et al., 2019). Edwards believes using integrated computer-based medical records can lead to better documentation and, consequently, reduce medical errors (Edwards & Moczygemba, 2004).

However, as also noted by Frie and Mishra, the use of electronic documentation systems alone is not sufficient for preventing documentation errors (Frei et al., 2009; Mishra et al., 2009). Human force empowerment through education and enhancement of the knowledge and awareness of those in charge of medical documentation can greatly reduce documentation errors (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Adeleke et al., 2012; Asamani et al., 2014; Barton et al., 2012; Chaturvedi et al., 2016; Cook et al., 2017; Deremer et al., 2011; Duszak et al., 2012; Gershater et al., 2011; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Häyrinen, 2014; Hong et al., 2009; Jonsson et al., 2011; Legault et al., 2012; Lindo et al., 2016; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Quinn et al., 2015; Samuels & Fetzer, 2009; Saravi et al., 2016; Simons, 2009; Steel et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2013; Tuinman et al., 2017; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019; Ziauddin et al., 2012). Moreover, development, modification or use of standards or guidelines at a local, national or international scale is another solution that may help prevent documentation errors (Abdul-Kareem et al., 2019; Asamani et al., 2014; Cunningham et al., 2014; Deremer et al., 2011; Duszak et al., 2012; Frei et al., 2009; Gartlan et al., 2010; Gjevjon & Hellesø, 2010; Hansen & Fossum, 2016; Häyrinen, 2014; Hong et al., 2009; Jonsson et al., 2011; Jordan O’Brien et al., 2011; Lövestam et al., 2013; Mishra et al., 2009; Nyamulani & Mulwafu, 2018; Paans et al., 2010; Rose et al., 2019; Salem et al., 2015; Skyttberg et al., 2017; Steel et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2013; Tuinman et al., 2017; Woldegerima & Kemal, 2019).

Conclusion

Documentation errors and deficiencies, especially those that have not been resolved or modified, always threaten the process of healthcare service provision to patients and, consequently, the health of individuals and society. Thus, it is necessary to identify and resolve underlying factors contributing to these errors and empower the human force. To this end, measures such as the adoption of policies for improving documentation at a small and large scale, movement towards electronic documentation equipped with automatic error detection systems and standardisation of the documentation process can be of great assistance.

Appendix

Table A1.

Search Strategies

	Search Strategy	Record Count
PubMed	((“Quality Control”[Mesh]) AND (“MedicalRecords”[Mesh])) OR ((document[ti] OR “medicalrecord”[ti] OR “health record”[ti] OR “care record”[ti] OR “clinical record”[ti] OR chart[ti]) AND (lapse[tiab] OR error[tiab] OR fault[tiab] OR mistake[tiab] OR mishap[tiab] OR slip[tiab] OR wrong[tiab] OR blunder[tiab] OR insufficien[tiab] OR deficien[tiab] OR delinquen[tiab] OR sloppy[tiab] OR irrelevan[tiab] OR inconsisten[tiab] OR inconstan[tiab] OR inaccura[tiab] OR illegibl[tiab] OR untime[tiab] OR poor[tiab] OR audit[tiab] OR quality[tiab] OR qualification[tiab]))	3334
EMBASE	From2009/01/01to 2019/04/14,English	1759
EMBASE	(‘error’/exp OR ‘monitoring’/exp OR ‘quality control’/exp)AND’medicalrecord’/exp/mjAND(‘documentation’/exp/mj OR ‘medical record review’/exp OR chart$:ti OR “medicalrecord$”:ti OR “healthcare record$”:ti OR “clinicalrecord$”:ti OR “health record$”:ti) AND (2009:py OR 2010:py OR 2011:py OR 2012:py OR 2013:py OR 2014:py OR 2015:py OR 2016:py OR 2017:py OR 2018:py OR 2019:py)AND[english]/limAND[embase]/lim	1759
Scopus	(TITLE ((document* OR ”medical record?”[ti] OR ”health record?” OR ”clinical record” OR chart?))) OR (KEY ((document* OR ”medical record?”[ti] OR ”health record?” OR ”clinical record” OR chart?))) AND (TITLE-ABS-KEY (laps* OR error? OR fault?	1423
Scopus	OR mistake? OR miss* OR mishap? OR slip? OR wrong OR blunder? OR insufficien* OR deficien* OR delinquen* OR sloppy OR peril? OR irrelevan* OR inconsisten* OR inconstan* OR inaccura* OR illegibl* OR untime* OR poor OR audit* OR quality OR qualification)) AND (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2019) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2018) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2017) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2016) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2015) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2014) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2013) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2012) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2011) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2010) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2009)) AND (LIMIT-TO(LANGUAGE,”English”))	1423
Web OfScience	SU=(Life Sciences & Biomedicine) AND (TS= (document* OR “medical record?” OR “health record?” OR “clinicalrecord” OR “care record” OR chart?)) AND (TS=(laps OR error? OR fault? OR mistake? OR miss* OR mishap?	306
Web OfScience	OR slip? OR wrong OR blunder? OR insufficien* OR deficien* OR delinquen* OR sloppy OR peril? OR irrelevan* OR inconsisten* OR inconstan* OR inaccura* OR illegibl* OR untime* OR poor OR audit* OR quality OR qualification))) ANDLANGUAGE: (English)	306
GoogleScholar	CustomRange: 2009:2019	768
	allintitle:~medical record (audit OR quality OR error OR errors OR poor OR wrong OR illegible OR illegibility OR illegibly OR insufficient OR insufficiency OR deficiency OR deficient OR delinquent OR delinquency OR irrelevant OR irrelevancy)	341
	allintitle:~medical record(inconsistent OR inconsistency OR inaccuracy OR inaccurate OR untimed OR untimely OR lap OR laps OR slip OR slips OR mistake OR mistakes OR mishap OR mishaps OR blunder OR blunders OR sloppy)	4
	allintitle:~clinical record (audit OR quality OR error OR errors OR poor OR wrong OR illegible OR illegibility OR illegibly OR insufficient OR insufficiency OR deficiency OR deficient OR delinquent OR delinquency OR irrelevant OR irrelevancy)	69
	allintitle:~clinicalrecord (inconsistent OR inconsistency OR inaccuracy OR inaccurate OR untimed OR untimely OR lap OR laps OR slip OR slips OR mistake OR mistakes OR mishap OR mishaps OR blunder OR blunders OR sloppy)	1
	allintitle:~health record (audit OR quality OR error OR errors OR poor OR wrong OR illegible OR illegibility OR illegibly OR insufficient OR insufficiency OR deficiency OR deficient OR delinquent OR delinquency OR irrelevant OR irrelevancy)	312
	allintitle:~health record (inconsistent OR inconsistency OR inaccuracy OR inaccurate OR untimed OR untimely OR lap OR laps OR slip OR slips OR mistake OR mistakes OR mishap OR mishaps OR blunder OR blunders OR sloppy)	2
	allintitle:~healthcare record (audit OR quality OR error OR errors OR poor OR wrong OR illegible OR illegibility OR illegibly OR insufficient OR insufficiency OR deficiency OR deficient OR delinquent OR delinquency OR irrelevant OR irrelevancy)	26
	allintitle:~healthcare record (inconsistent OR inconsistency OR inaccuracy OR inaccurate OR untimed OR untimely OR lap OR laps OR slip OR slips OR mistake OR mistakes OR mishap OR mishaps OR blunder OR blunders OR sloppy)	1
	allintitle:~clinical chart? (audit OR quality OR error OR errors OR poor OR wrong OR illegible OR illegibility OR illegibly OR insufficient OR insufficiency OR deficiency OR deficient OR delinquent OR delinquency OR irrelevant OR irrelevancy)	6
	allintitle:~clinical charts (audit OR quality OR error OR errors OR poor OR wrong OR illegible OR illegibility OR illegibly OR insufficient OR insufficiency OR deficiency OR deficient OR delinquent OR delinquency OR irrelevant OR irrelevancy)	6
	allintitle:~clinical chart (inconsistent OR inconsistency OR inaccuracy OR inaccurate OR untimed OR untimely OR lap OR laps OR slip OR slips OR mistake OR mistakes OR mishap OR mishaps OR blunder OR blunders OR sloppy)	0
	allintitle:~clinical charts (inconsistent OR inconsistency OR inaccuracy OR inaccurate OR untimed OR untimely OR lap OR laps OR slip OR slips OR mistake OR mistakes OR mishap OR mishaps OR blunder OR blunders OR sloppy)	0

Author Contributions

A. SH. was responsible for the study design, literature search, data extraction, quality assessment of the selected articles and manuscript preparation.

H. M. and F. A. were responsible for the study design, critically reviewing the manuscript, participating in screening the articles and assessing the quality of the selected articles.

A. H. contributed to assessing the quality of the selected articles and critically reviewing the manuscript.

F. A. was responsible for whole correspondence during the paper submission, handling the revisions and resubmission.

Footnotes

Acknowledgement

The current research has been approved by the ethics committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (ethics code: IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1397.708).

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

Abdelhak

, Grostick

, & Hanken

M. A.

(2007). Health information: Management of a strategic resource (3rd ed.). Saunders/Elsevier.

Abdelrahman

, & Abdelmageed

(2014). Medical record keeping: Clarity, accuracy, and timeliness are essential. BMJ: British Medical Journal , 348, f7716.

Abdul-Kareem

, Lindo

J. L. M.

, & Stennett

(2019). Medical-surgical nurses’ documentation of client teaching and discharge planning at a Jamaican hospital. International Nursing Review , 66(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12487

Abernethy

B. A. P.

, Ii

J. E. H.

, Wheeler

J. L.

, Rowe

, Marcello

, & Patwardhan

(2009). Poor documentation prevents adequate assessment of quality metrics in colorectal cancer. Journal of Oncology Practice , 5(4), 167–174.

Achar

, & Wu

(2012). How to reduce your malpractice risk. Family Practice Management , 19(4), 21–26.

Adane

, Gizachew

, & Kendie

(2019). The role of medical data in efficient patient care delivery: a review. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy , 12, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S179259

Adeleke

I. T.

, Adekanye

A. O.

, Onawola

K. A.

, Okuku

A. G.

, Adefemi

S. A.

, Erinle

S. A.

, Shehu

A. A.

, Yahaya

O. E.

, Adebisi

A. A.

, James

J. A.

, Abdulghaney

O. O.

, Ogundiran

L. M.

, Jibril

A. D.

, Atakere

M. E.

, Achinbee

, Abodunrin

O. A.

, & Hassan

M. W.

(2012). Data quality assessment in healthcare: a 365-day chart review of inpatients’ health records at a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , 19(6), 1039–1042. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000823

Asakura

, Alto

, Ordal

, & Whitcomb

W. F.

(2014). The role of hospital medicine in inpatient clinical documentation. Hospital Medicine Clinics , 3(4), 604–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehmc.2014.07.001

Asamani

J. A.

, Amenorpe

F. D.

, Babanawo

, Maria

, & Ofei

(2014). Nursing documentation of inpatient care in eastern Ghana. British Journal of Nursing , 23(1), 48–53.

10.

Asghari

, Mardanshahi

, Farahabadi

E. B.

, & Siamian

(2016). The quantitative study of the faculty members performance in documentation of the medical records in teaching hospitals of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Materia Socio-Medica , 28(4), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2016.28.292297

11.

Barton

, Futtermenger

, Gaddi

, Kang

, Rivers

, Spriggs

, Jenkins

P. F.

, Thompson

C. H.

, & Thomas

J. S.

(2012). Simple prescribing errors and allergy documentation in medical hospital admissions in Australia and New Zealand. Clinical Medicine , 12(2), 119–123.

12.

Bergrath

, Skorning

, Ro

, Beckers

S. K.

, Brokmann

, Mutscher

, & Rossaint

(2011). Is paper-based documentation in an emergency medical service adequate for retrospective scientific analysis? An evaluation of a physician-run service. Emergency Medicine Journal , 28, 320–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2009.086538

13.

Broughton

E. I.

, Ikram

A. N.

, & Sahak

(2013). How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan’s maternal health facilities? An observational validity study. BMJ Open , 3(4), e002554. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002554

14.

Callen

, McIntosh

, & Li

(2010). Accuracy of medication documentation in hospital discharge summaries: A retrospective analysis of medication transcription errors in manual and electronic discharge summaries. International Journal of Medical Informatics , 79(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.09.002

15.

Chang

, Schyve

P. M.

, Croteau

R. J.

, O’Leary

D. S.

, & Loeb

J. M.

(2005). The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: A standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care , 17(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi021

16.

Charles

, Hood

, DeRosier

J. M.

, Gosbee

J. W.

, Bagian

J. P.

, Li

, Caird

M. S.

, Biermann

J. S.

, & Hake

M. E.

(2017). Root cause analysis and actions for the prevention of medical errors: Quality improvement and resident education. Orthopedics , 40(4), e628–e635. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20170418-04

17.

Charles

, Hood

, Derosier

J. M.

, Gosbee

J. W.

, Li

, Caird

M. S.

, Biermann

J. S.

, & Hake

M. E.

(2016). How to perform a root cause analysis for workup and future prevention of medical errors: A review. Patient Safety in Surgery , 10, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-016-0107-8

18.

Chaturvedi

, Randive

, Raven

, Diwan

, & De Costa

(2016). Assessment of the quality of clinical documentation in India’s JSY cash transfer program for facility births in Madhya Pradesh. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics , 132(2), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.016

19.

Chen

, Hailey

, Wang

, & Yu

(2014). A review of data quality assessment methods for public health information systems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 11(5), 5170–5207.

20.

Chen

, Yu

, Hailey

, & Wang

(2014). Methods for assessing the quality of data in public health information systems: A critical review. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics , 204, 13–18.

21.

Chowdhury

S. A.

, & Habib

(2015). Improved documentation and record management: a necessity to prevent medical errors in health care system. SSRG International Journal of Medical Science (SSRG-IJMS) , 2(11), 1–3.

22.

Cook

E. D.

, Iglehart

E. I.

, Baum

, Schover

L. L.

, & Newman

L. L.

(2017). Missing documentation in breast cancer survivors: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Menopause , 24(12), 1360–1364. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000926

23.

Cunningham

, Williamson

, Robinson

K. M.

, Carroll

, Buchanan

, & Paul

(2014). The quality of medical record documentation and External cause of fall injury coding in a tertiary teaching hospital. Health Information Management , 43(1), 6–15.

24.

Davoudi

, Dooling

J. A.

, Glondys

, Jones

T. D.

, Kadlec

, Overgaard

S. M.

, Ruben

, & Wendicke

(2015). Data quality management model (updated). Journal of AHIMA , 86(10), 62–65.

25.

Department of Health (DH), Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP), & British Medical Association (BMA). British Medical Association (2011). The Good Practice Guidelines for GP electronic patient records v4 . Department of Health and Social Care. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-good-practice-guidelines-for-gp-electronic-patient-records-version-4-2011

26.

Deremer

C. E.

, Fleming

V. H.

, & May

J. R.

(2011). Evaluation of pain management documentation. Southern Medical Journal , 104(9), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3182296f20

27.

Duszak

R. J.

, Nossal

, Schofield

, & Picus

(2012). Physician documentation deficiencies in abdominal ultrasound reports: Frequency, characteristics, and financial impact. Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR , 9(6), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2012.01.006

28.

Edwards

, & Moczygemba

(2004). Reducing medical errors through better documentation. The Health Care Manager , 23(4), 329–333.

29.

Farr

(2018). This patient’s medical record said she’d given birth twice—in fact, she’d never been pregnant . CNBC LLC. A Division of NBC Universal. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/09/medical-record-errors-common-hard-to-fix.html

30.

Frei

, Huber

L. C.

, Simon

R. W.

, Bonani

, & Thomas

(2009). Insufficient medication documentation at hospital admission of cardiac patients: A challenge for medication reconciliation. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology , 54(6), 497–501.

31.

Garcia

B. H.

, Svendsen

, & Frode

(2017). Quality of medication information in discharge summaries from hospitals: An audit of electronic patient records. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy , 39(6), 1331–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-017-0556-x

32.

Gartee

(2011). Health information technology and management . Pearson Education.

33.

Gartlan

, Smith

, Clennett

, Walshe

, Tomlinson-Smith

, & Boas

(2010). An audit of the adequacy of acute wound care documentation of surgical inpatients. Journal of Clinical Nursing , 19(15-16), 2207–2214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03265.x

34.

Gershater

M. A.

, Pilhammar

, Roijer

C. A.

(2011). Documentation of diabetes care in home nursing service in a Swedish municipality: A cross-sectional study on nurses’ documentation. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences , 25(2), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00812.x

35.

Gjevjon

E. R.

, & Hellesø

(2010). The quality of home care nurses’ documentation in new electronic patient records. Journal of Clinical Nursing , 100, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02953.x

36.

Green

, & Bowie

M. J.

(2011). Essentials of health information management: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.

37.

Gurley

K. L.

, Grossman

S. A.

, Janes

, Yu-Moe

C. W.

, Song

, Tibbles

C. D.

, Shapiro

N. I.

, & Rosen

C. L.

(2018). Comparison of emergency medicine malpractice cases involving residents to nonresident cases. Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine , 25(9), 980–986. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13430

38.

Gutheil

T. G.

(2004). Fundamentals of medical record documentation. Psychiatry (Edgmont) , 1(3), 26.

39.

Hansen

, & Fossum

(2016). Nursing documentation of pressure ulcers in nursing homes: Comparison of record content and patient examinations. Nursing Open , 3(3), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.47

40.

Hartel

M. J.

, Staub

L. P.

, Röder

, & Eggli

(2011). High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process. BMC Health Services Research , 11(1), 199. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-199

41.

Haux

, Ammenwerth

, Winter

, & Brigl

(2004). Strategic information management in hospitals: An introduction to hospital information systems . Springer Science & Business Media.

42.

Häyrinen

(2014). Evaluation of physiotherapists’ documentation: A retrospective record analysis before the implementation of national recommendations in the EHR system. Electronic Journal of Health Informatics , 8(1), 1–10.

43.

Homan

(2007). Chapter 2: Functions of the health record . American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA). https://pdf4pro.com/download/chapter-2-functions-of-the-health-record-6ed0e.html

44.

Hong

T. T.

, Walker

S. M.

, & Mckenzie

(2009). The quality of injury data from hospital records in Vietnam. Health Information Management , 38(1), 15–21.

45.

Huffman

E. K.

(1994). Health information management (formerly medical records management) . Physician Record Company.

46.

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Data Standards for Patient Safety. (2003). Key Capabilities of an electronic health record system . National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221802/

47.

Iqbal

, Bilal

, Sarwar

, & Murphy

R. P.

(2011). Epilepsy audit: Do we document everything? Irish Journal of Medical Science , 180(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0542-y

48.

Jeff

(2015). Reduce your malpractice RISK. Top 10 documenting mistakes to avoid. The Journal of the Michigan Dental Association , 97(12), 24–29.

49.

Johnson

S. G.

, Speedie

, Simon

, Kumar

, & Westra

B. L.

(2015). A data quality ontology for the secondary use of EHR data. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings , 2015, 1937–1946.

50.

Jonsson

, Jonsdottir

, Moller

A. D.

, Baldursdottir

, Jonsson

, Jonsdottir

, & Alma

D. M.

(2011). Nursing documentation prior to emergency admissions to the intensive care unit. Nursing in Critical Care , 16(4), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-5153.2011.00427.x

51.

Jordan O’Brien

, Cowman

, O Brien

J. A. J.

, & Cowman

(2011). An exploration of nursing documentation of pressure ulcer care in an acute setting in Ireland. Journal of Wound Care , 20(5), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2011.20.5.197

52.

Kahn

M. G.

, Callahan

T. J.

, Barnard

, Bauck

A. E.

, Brown

, Davidson

B. N.

, Estiri

, Goerg

, Holve

, & Johnson

S. G.

(2016). A harmonized data quality assessment terminology and framework for the secondary use of electronic health record data. eGEMs: The Journal of Electronic Health Data and Methods , 4(1), 1244.

53.

Karp

, Huerta

J. M.

, Dobbs

C. A.

, Dukes

D. L.

, & Kenady

(2008). Medical record documentation for patient safety and physician defensibility . Medical Insurance Exchange of California.

54.

Legault

, Ostro

, Khalid

, Wasi

, & You

J. J.

(2012). Quality of discharge summaries prepared by first year internal medicine residents. BMC Medical Education , 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-77

55.

Lindh

W. Q.

, Pooler

, Tamparo

C. D.

, Dahl

B. M.

, & Morris

(2013). Comprehensive medical assisting: Administrative and clinical competencies . Delmar Cengage Learning.

56.

Lindo

, Stennett

, Stephenson-Wilson

, Barrett

K. A.

, Bunnaman

, Anderson-Johnson

, Waugh-Brown

, & Wint

(2016). An audit of nursing documentation at three public hospitals in Jamaica. Journal of Nursing Scholarship , 48(5), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12234

57.

Lippincott Nursing Education. (2018). Nursing documentation: How to avoid the most common medical documentation errors . Wolters Kluwer. http://nursingeducation.lww.com/blog.entry.html/2018/02/22/nursing_documentatio-S5hF.html

58.

Lövestam

, Orrevall

, Koochek

, Karlström

, & Andersson

(2013). Evaluating documentation of dietetic care in Swedish medical records. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics , 108(7), 2013. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-289-9-1078

59.

Mishra

A. K.

, Bhattarai

, Bhurtel

, Bista

N. R.

, Shrestha

, Thakali

, Banthia

, & Pathak

S. R.

(2009). Need for improvement of medical records. JNMA: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association , 48(174), 103–106.

60.

Mitchell

P. H.

(2008). Defining patient safety and quality care. In Hughes

R. G.

(Ed.), Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses . Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2681/

61.

Moghaddasi

(2005). Information quality in health care (pp. 112–114). Vajepardaz.

62.

Moghaddasi

, & Rahimi

(2016). A systemic biologic model for healthcare data quality. HIM Interchange , 6(1), 28–32.

63.

Morphet

, Griffiths

D. L.

, Innes

, Crawford

, Crow

, & Williams

(2014). Shortfalls in residents’ transfer documentation: Challenges for emergency department staff. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal , 17(3), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.2014.03.004

64.

Nyamulani

, & Mulwafu

(2018). The quality of hand-written operative notes in a surgical unit at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Malawi: A prospective completed audit loop study. Malawi Medical Journal , 30(2), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/782720

65.

Oppenheim

(2012). The medical record as evidence . Atom Press.

66.

Paans

, Sermeus

, Nieweg

R. M. B.

, & van der Schans

C. P.

(2010). Prevalence of accurate nursing documentation in patient records. Journal of Advanced Nursing , 66(11), 2481–2489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05433.x

67.

Page

M. J.

, McKenzie

J. E.

, Bossuyt

P. M.

, Boutron

, Hoffmann

T. C.

, Mulrow

C. D.

, Shamseer

, Tetzlaff

J. M.

, Akl

E. A.

, Brennan

S. E.

, Chou

, Glanville

, Grimshaw

J. M.

, Hróbjartsson

, Lalu

M. M.

, Li

, Loder

E. W.

, Mayo-Wilson

, McDonald

, Moher

(2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ , 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

68.

Quinn

B. G. P.

, Block

R. G.

, Clayman

M. L.

, Kelvin

, Arvey

S. R.

, Lee

, Reinecke

, Sehovic

, Jacobsen

P. B.

, Reed

, Gonzalez

, Vadaparampil

S. T.

, Laronga

, Lee

M. C.

, Pow-Sang

, Eggly

, Franklin

, Shah

, Fulp

W. J.

, & Hayes-Lattin

(2015). If you did not document it, it did not happen: Rates of documentation of discussion of infertility risk in adolescent and young adult oncology patients’ medical records. Journal of Oncology Practice , 11(2), 137–144.

69.

Rodziewicz

T. L.

, & Hipskind

J. E. H.

(2019). Medical error prevention . U.S. National Library of Medicine.

70.

Rose

, Newton

, Boualam

, Bogne

, Ketchum

, Shah

, Mitchell

, Tanveer

, Lurie

, Robinson

, Duncan

, Thom

, & Tran

Q. K.

(2019). Assessing adequacy of emergency provider documentation among interhospital transferred patients with acute aortic dissection. World Journal of Emergency Medicine , 10(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920

71.

Salazar

, Best

T. M.

, & Hiestand

(2011). Incomplete documentation of elements of Ottawa Ankle Rules despite an electronic medical record. American Journal of Emergency Medicine , 29(9), 999–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2010.05.012

72.

Salem

O. A.

, Villagracia

H. N.

, & Dignah

M. A.

(2015). Medical record audit in clinical nursing units in tertiary hospital. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science , 4(6), 27–33.

73.

Samuels

J. G.

, & Fetzer

(2009). Pain management documentation quality as a reflection of nurses’ clinical judgment. Journal of Nursing Care Quality , 24(3), 223–231.

74.

Saravi

B. M.

, Asgari

, Bagherian

, & Heidari

(2016). Documentation of medical records in hospitals of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in 2014: A quantitative study. Acta Informatica Medica , 24(4), 202–205. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2016.24.202–206

75.

Scott

R. W.

(2013). Legal, ethical, and practical aspects of patient care documentation: A guide for rehabilitation professionals . Jones & Bartlett Learning.

76.

Simons

(2009). Identifying medication errors in surgical prescription charts. Pediatric Nursing . 22(5), 20–24.

77.

Skurka

M. A.

(1998). Health information management: Principles and organization for health record services . John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

78.

Skyttberg

, Chen

, Blomqvist

, & Koch

(2017). Exploring vital sign data quality in electronic health records with focus on Emergency Care Warning Scores. Applied Clinical Informatics , 8(3), 880–892.

79.

Sowan

A. K.

, Vera

, Malshe

, Reed

(2019). Transcription errors of blood glucose values and insulin errors in an intensive care unit: Secondary data analysis toward electronic medical record-glucometer interoperability. 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2196/11873

80.

Steel

, Georgiou

, Balandin

, Hill

, Worrall

, & Hemsley

(2019). A content analysis of documentation on communication disability in hospital progress notes: Diagnosis, function, and patient safety. Clinical Rehabilitation , 33(5), 943–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215518819717

81.

STROBE Statement. (2007). STROBE statement—Checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies . https://www.strobe-statement.org/fileadmin/Strobe/uploads/checklists/STROBE_checklist_v4_cross-sectional.pdf

82.

Tan

E. W.

, Ting

B. L.

, Jia

, Skolasky

R. L.

, McFarland

E. G.

, Eric

, Ting

B. L.

, Jia

, Skolasky

R. L.

, & McFarland

E. G.

(2013). Diagnostic errors in orthopaedic surgery: Evaluation of resident documentation of neurovascular examinations for orthopaedic trauma patients. American Journal of Medical Quality: The Official Journal of the American College of Medical Quality , 28(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860612447856

83.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). (2016). Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) assignment of error categories . https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Monitoring-Programs/Medicare-FFS-Compliance-Programs/CERT/Downloads/CERTAssignmentofErrorCategories_January2016.pdf

84.

The Medicare Learning Network. (2017). Complying with medical record documentation requirements . https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/CERTMedRecDoc-FactSheet-ICN909160.pdf

85.

Tuinman

, De Greef

M. H. G.

, Krijnen

W. P.

, Paans

, & Roodbol

P. F.

(2017). Accuracy of documentation in the nursing care plan in long-term institutional care. Geriatric Nursing , 38(6), 578–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.04.007

86.

Wager

K. A.

, Lee

F. W.

, & Glaser

J. P.

(2017). Managing health care information systems: A practical approach for health care executives . John Wiley & Sons.

87.

Walley

, Peden

A. N. N. H.

, & May

(2016). Laboratory order errors before and after implementation of electronic health record. Clinical Laboratory Science , 29(3), 158–162.

88.

Weiskopf

N. G.

, & Weng

(2013). Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: Enabling reuse for clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association , 20(1), 144–151.

89.

Woldegerima

, & Kemal

(2019). Clinical audit on the practice of documentation at preanesthetic evaluation in a specialized university hospital. International Journal of Surgery Open , 16, 1–5.

90.

World Health Organization. (2003). Improving data quality: A guide for developing countries . http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/206974

91.

World Health Organization. (2006). Medical records manual: A guide for developing countries . http://iris.wpro.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665.1/10515/9290610050_rev_eng.pdf

92.

World Health Organization. (2016). Patient Safety Curriculum Guide: Topic 5: Learning from errors to prevent harm . http://www.who.int/patientsafety/activities/technical/medical_curriculum/en/index.html

93.

Ziauddin Saeedi

, Muhammad

, & Mahmood

(2012). Medical record documentation of patients admitted to a medical unit in a teaching hospital. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute (Peshawar-Pakistan) , 26(4), 386–389.